similar to: robocopy from samba stalls

Ok, I've analyzed this and found that the cause is a call to getpwuid(uid) with the uid being that of the domain controller. "wbinfo --uid-info=3000074" works and returns information, but this library function fails. This is then propagated upwards as a memory error, because it is being called from getpwuid_alloc() which is a talloc variant. the api doesn't allow us to

Ok, but is there another upgrade path possible, e.g. via 4.8? I am upgrading via source build, btw. The reason I'm asking is because i've been asked me to check using samba git 'master" source to check that pesky bind restart bug ( https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214) Since this is in production, I need to get my environment up to "latest" in order to do

On 17 January 2018 at 16:00, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Well, I had a cursory glance dlz_bind9.c and also the bind9 source code I > could find ( > http://users.isc.org/~each/doxygen/bind9/dlz__dlopen__driver > _8c-source.html) > and didn´t see any provision for 'reload' in there. > bind is clearly calling the dlz_destroy()

Well, I had a cursory glance dlz_bind9.c and also the bind9 source code I could find ( http://users.isc.org/~each/doxygen/bind9/dlz__dlopen__driver_8c-source.html) and didn´t see any provision for 'reload' in there. bind is clearly calling the dlz_destroy() function and not dlz_create(), as one would expect, for a reload. So yes, it appears to be a shortcoming of bind. 1) I suggest that

so the DC with FSMO is not done first?     Van: Kristján Valur Jónsson [mailto:kristjan at rvx.is] Verzonden: vrijdag 28 december 2018 17:08 Aan: L.P.H. van Belle Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] replication failing for 4.9.4 dc01 is still running 4.7.7.  No need to restart it.  There is also still a DC03 running 4.7.7.  the only one I've upgraded is DC02.  resolv.conf on DC02 is configured with

On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:45:56 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at rvx.is> wrote: > Any thoughts? Have code, will debug. The error itself is > meaningless to me and I am deeply and utterly unfamiliar with samba > code, but if you have any thought or experiments in mind... > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 16:07, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:11:59 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at rvx.is> wrote: > Here are log files from my two DCs that are set up in redundant DHCP > mode. One of them is running with the -v flag in dhcp-dyndns, hence > is much more verbose. > dc02 is the primary, dc03 is secondary > log_dc02, log_dc03, show a failed dyndns session from Fridriks_iphone. > >

Hai, DC1, did you reboot it or just restarted services, i advice a reboot. Then on DC2. Samba internal DNS by accident? If so, stop samba, set log level = 10 Start it wait 30 sec, stop it. Now change the resolv.conf so DC1 is the first contacted. and start it again. Test again. Now im out the office in 15 min, but try this. Keep these logs, a samba dev may ask for it. Greetz,

Fyi, I've been trying to get the devs to take notice of this problem. People keep pointing fingers. Samba says its Named/bind, bind says its the OS vendors.... See: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230 Maybe I'll be forced to hack on the code myself to figure out what's really happening when a "reload" happens.

On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:54:24 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:45:56 +0000 > Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at rvx.is> wrote: > > > Any thoughts? Have code, will debug. The error itself is > > meaningless to me and I am deeply and utterly unfamiliar with samba > > code, but if you have any thought or

Hai, Check the content of : /etc/logrotate.d/named If you see postrotate /etc/init.d/smbd reload > /dev/null endscript Change that to postrotate if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then; systemctl -q is-active named && systemctl reload named; else; /etc/init.d/named reload ; fi'; endscript Its something like that, so who pointing.. That does not matter, because this is OS

No, I'm reading the dlz_bind9.c code. I've found and fixed the problem. It turns out that using a reference counted singleton is a bad idea. The singleton is defunct after reload. If we simply create a new state object and destroy the old one as bind is trying to let us do, things work out fine. This works, at least, for bind9.9. I cant test with the older (9.8), so it is possible that

On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 15:38:59 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there. > I'm trying to upgrad from 4.7.7 to 4.9.4. > I built from source, running on centos 7.6 on a Raspberry Pi. > When testing on a secondary DC, my "samba-tool drs showrepl" errors > out with: > > ERROR(<class

Hello there. I´ve been having problems with dynamic dns update by dhcp on my samba ADDC running on CentOS 7 on an RPI2. After a while, the dhccp_dyndns.sh stops stops being able to authenticate with named. for the longest time I was stumped with this, exploring all kinds of kerberos issues, but found out that *restartint* named did resolve the issue. I have finally traced this problem down to a

Well, I had a look at the python bindings and the error handling was in shambles. I fixed libgpo/pygpo.c and I now get: gpos = ads.get_gpo_list(creds.get_username()) SystemError: Failed to get machine token for 'DC01$' (CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=rvx,DC=is) (the failing call is status = gp_get_machine_token(self->ads_ptr, frame, dn,

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:55:10 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello there. > So, I have a Samba AD setup, with DHCP and samba_dlz setup as > described in the wiki. > > However, I find that after a while, dynamic DHCPD updates stop > working. The fix is for me to restart the named server. > > When in this state, I get log

Well, I created a bug report for this issue. Seems that none of the developers has picked up on it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Mark Nienberg <mnlists at tippingstructural.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> I have

On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:49:36 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson <kristjan at rvx.is> wrote: > Thanks for your comments. The settings are as they are since I used > the default Centos settings as much as possible, adopting the > functional difference from the wiki. I understand this, it is just that when I try out red-hat distros, I have to make the changes I suggested, or it doesn't

Hello there. I have a setup with Samba AD and a Named backend. Everything has been working fine, until a few days ago, I cannot start the DNS snap-in from windows. I get a dialog box saying "Access was denied. Would you like to add it anyway?" If I enable level 3 debugging in the samba.conf, I get the following: [2017/05/11 07:25:30.413481, 3]

Bingo! That's it. I think I owe you a beer, mate :) On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Just a wild guess, but I and others have been having problems with > samba_dlz, because of named "reload." > Try to see if > systemctl reload named > and > systemctl restart named > break and fix the