similar to: problem with net sam set workstations

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "problem with net sam set workstations"

2020 Oct 24
4
samba ad errors in log
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:13 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > denied access to sysvol and a client is being denied updating its record. > > Does the DC use itself as the first nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf ? Same issue whether or not I point to itself first or to the local cache. > Who is user '5035' ? No clue, all users have a uidNumber
2016 Jul 12
6
Option configure
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:00 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Chris, can you check into your unit file what kind of type is used? Mine use Type=forking, I had some issues with Type=notify but it's been some time so I can't remember what they were. Although one is that a "systemctl start samba" command did not return a prompt, had to Ctrl-C out.
2007 May 17
1
"net sam set workstations ..." prevents users from using domain resources from non-domain member systems
Running into a serious problem here with 3.0.24 + patches. The shop has a mix of domain member computers and privately owned non-domain member computers. I'm trying to use "net sam set workstations" to limit the workstations domain users can log onto. This limitation works as expected. And domain member workstations all work properly. But once the workstation limit is put in
2017 Jan 30
4
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:07:39 -0500 > Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > > wrote: > > > > > When you built Samba, did you use the '--with-ntvfs-fileserver' > > > or > > >
2017 Jan 30
2
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 08:42 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:44:15 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:07:39 -0500 > > > Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29,
2016 Jul 12
2
Option configure
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > It appears that Samba does not check for > libsystemd (only libsystemd-daemon and libsystemd-journal) during the > config phase so unless one is running some ancient version of systemd > the "--with-systemd" configure option may be quite useless. Might be wrong on this, see the
2017 Feb 20
1
strange auth issue
Windows make any "Levenshtein distance" into domains and fix them??? ummm.... ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Ing. Luis Felipe Domínguez Vega" <luis.dominguez at mtz.desoft.cu> Para: "Sonic" <sonicsmith at gmail.com> CC: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Lunes, 20 de Febrero 2017 15:08:59 Asunto: Re: [Samba] strange auth
2024 Jan 05
2
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:32?PM Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > <snip> I would think the wikis would mention the GPO not being > needed. Did you see the section titles "Default Time Source" in the page you link to that I quoted previously? The wiki clearly spells it out that using a GPO is usually unnecessary. > How do you know you're
2016 Jul 12
3
Option configure
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:13 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you simply try to modify type=forking to type=notify and test again? > Perhaps your old has disappeared (they do sometimes, not often enough)... Seems to work for starting smbd and nmbd (although Type=forking has been running flawlessly for many months) on my Gentoo system. In my Debian LXC
2007 Dec 17
0
net sam setworkstations !logic
Hello, Is there any way to use NOT logic with "net sam set workstations"? Instead of explicitly declaring which workstations are allowed, I would like to explicitly declare which ones are not on a per user basis. The reason is that many users bring in their own systems (desktops/laptops) and in order to deny them logons to administrative systems I have to limit access via "net
2017 Nov 23
7
Compiling Samba 4.7 with systemd support on Fedora 26
The systemd unit file looks like as follows: [Unit] Description=Winbindd Service After=syslog.target network.target [Service] Environment=KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/run/samba/krb5cc_samba Type=notify NotifyAccess=all PIDFile=/var/run/samba/ ExecStart=/usr/local/samba/sbin/winbindd -D ExecReload=/usr/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID LimitCORE=infinity [Install] @Rowland I am not blaming samba at all, certainly is
2016 Sep 06
2
samba crashing on start up INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11
Also see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592502 On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> wrote: >> When you build, please have the correct header and -dev libs around >> that you will later use. > > In most cases there are no separate dev packages in Gentoo,
2017 Jan 29
3
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > When you built Samba, did you use the '--with-ntvfs-fileserver' or > '--enable-selftest' options with configure ? > I used '--without-ntvfs-fileserver'.
2017 Sep 13
2
Slow, Incorrect Group Resolution through Winbind
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:18:59 -0400 Sonic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Rich Otero via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > idmap config * : range = 16777216-33554431 > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > > Should be more like: > idmap config STUDENTS : range =
2017 Sep 13
4
Slow, Incorrect Group Resolution through Winbind
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:58:27 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:18:59 -0400 > > Sonic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Should be more like: > >> idmap config STUDENTS : range =
2016 Apr 02
2
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
Think I should actively STOP that service? On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Luke Barone <lukebarone at gmail.com> wrote: > > [ ok ] Restarting samba-ad-dc (via systemctl): samba-ad-dc.service. > > > > I may try rebooting as well, after trying @penny's fix. But that's what > >
2017 Nov 23
1
Compiling Samba 4.7 with systemd support on Fedora 26
Yes I have /var/run/samba/ , I spotted the error with not having an actual filename while I was posting this message. Does the pid file need to be in the same path as samba ? On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Arnab Roy <arniekol at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > PIDFile=/var/run/samba/ > > >
2023 Dec 27
1
bind crashes after samba upgrade
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 12:21?PM Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 2:31?PM Kris Lou via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > named.conf.local > > > ===================== > > > include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; > > > ===================== > > > > Is the correct
2019 Jun 19
2
error when trying to copy file from samba share to old Windows CE share
If I open the file with notepad++, make an edit and save it, then it will copy successfully. If I open it with regular Notepad, and edit/save the file, it still fails. Changing the filename/extension did nothing. Is there a way on windows to view extra attributes or something? On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 3:13 PM Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:41 AM
2017 Sep 13
2
Slow, Incorrect Group Resolution through Winbind
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:37:17 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > For the 'DOMAIN' domain you can use several different backends > > (rid, ad etc) but I wouldn't use the tdb backend, how are you going > > to be sure you will get the same IDs