similar to: Group Policy Issues

Hello James, Thanks for your suggestion. When we had two servers in the pool, we were pushing GPO using rsync from PDC at every 30 minutes. However when we added the two more domain controllers, our rsync script turned to be a pull from PDC every 30 minutes. Would this have made those policy objects inconsistent? We have set up sysvol replication using rsync unidirectional that is a push

Hi, Let me just check this and revert back. -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to eXza Technology Consulting & Services, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have

Hi, We have been consistently having issues with GPO and they are not consistent. We are using version 4.6.3 with BIND DNS Backend. As suggested in some of our previous communications, when we run the samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it results in the error as detailed below. [root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters Initialising global parameters rlimit_max:

Hello Marc, > Hi Anantha, > > Am 06.07.2017 um 10:02 schrieb Anantha Raghava via samba: >> Is there any way we can rebuild corrupt Default Domain Policy and >> Default Domain Controller Policy. > What is broken? Entire Default Domain and Default Domain Controller Policies along with other Polices that we had built are broken. >> In windows AD we can use dcgpofix

Hi, We are using Samba AD 4.6.3 and built it from source on CentOS 7. The DNS back end is BIND 9.9.4 Initially all replications were working fine and all group policies were getting applied. All of a sudden, we are finding that GPO applying process is erratic. Sometime it applies and sometimes not. We have edited the Default Policy using Windows RAST tool. Thinking that ACLs on

Hello James, Thanks for your quick response. Find attached smb.conf file from DC1 and DC2. Also attached the screen shot of the event viewer from the workstation. At the moment, we have brought down the DC3 and DC4 in another location and observed that DC2 is unable to replicate get the information from DC1 or send the information to DC1. It appears replication is working in background but

Hi, Is there any way we can rebuild corrupt Default Domain Policy and Default Domain Controller Policy. In windows AD we can use dcgpofix utility to recreate the Default Domain and Domain Controller Policies. Something similar available in Samba AD DC? -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava Do not print this e-mail unless required. Save Paper & trees.

Hi! I have 3 Samba 4 , version 4.7.3 running in Ubuntu Server 16.04. All is ok, but GPO in DC3, with erro the permission, with dont load in windows(gpresult /force). My smb.conf all samba server DC. [global]         netbios name = SAMBA-DC103         realm = <DOMAIN>         server role = active directory domain controller         server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap,

HI Rsync DC1 to DC2 / DC3 root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt / samba / var / locks / sysvol root @ DCXX: / opt / samba / var / Run Windows "gpupdate / force", information error permission (show ID GPO, any gpos ...). Yes, the only gpo, with errors. Regards; On 10-01-2018 14:29, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > On 1/10/2018 8:59 AM, Carlos via samba wrote:

Hello, I have implemented Samba as Active Directory Domain Controller with Version 4.6.3 on CentOS 7.3, el-514. We have 4 domain controllers named as DC1, DC2, DC3 and DC4. DC1 & 2 are in one location and DC3 & 4 are in a different location. DNS is SAMBA INTERNAL. All 4 servers are properly synchronizing and even GPO updates are working properly with rsync process. However, off late

Hi, We just upgraded the Samba-AD from version 4.6.5 to 4.7.5. The upgrade threw many challenges and I will write a separate mail explaining the workaround that we adapted to get over them. One of the main challenges is GPO. While the user policy applies properly, the computer policies are not getting applied, rather they are erratic, On some PCs within the same LAN, it works, while on some,

On 1/11/2018 10:45 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: > Hi > > Any ? > > Regards; > > > On 10-01-2018 15:11, Carlos wrote: >> >> Every 5 minutes. >> >> This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid >> now ? >> >> *In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol. >> >> Regards; >> >> >>

Every 5 minutes. This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid now ? *In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol. Regards; On 10-01-2018 14:51, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > On 1/10/2018 11:42 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> HI >> >> Rsync >> >> DC1 to DC2 / DC3 >> >> root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt /

Hi, We have 4 Domain Controllers all on CentOS 7.5 and Samba Version 4.7.5. We are using iNotify to watch the folder and pushing any changes made to GPO from our first Domain Controller. Off late, we started observing that, unless the client is reading the Group Policies from the first Domain Controller, none of the Group Policies gets applied. On the Windows Clients, we have observed that

Hi Carlos, > > DC to DC2/DC3 -> > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ looking at your smb.conf file, you are using tdb idmap (default on DC). So the UID/SID mapping will be

Hi, String of peculiar behavior continues... Samba Version 4.7.5, Bind Version 9.8 No. of Samba-AD-DC Servers : 4 (dc1, dc2, dc3 & dc4). All FSMO roles are on dc1. All the while all things were perfect. Yesterday, due to some reason, the BIND Service on dc2 stopped. This resulted in none of the other domain controllers could resolve the names. On dc2, only named service was stopped but

On 10/7/2015 7:31 AM, mourik jan c heupink wrote: > On 7-10-2015 13:18, mourik jan c heupink wrote: >> So my dc3 seems unsynced or so. >> >> So I am now checking to make sure that my rsync replication script >> works as it should. (I'm guesssing it does NOT) > > The rsync seems to be working as it should, so now I'm > guessing that idmap.ldb differs

HI, We have done something similar using inotify. On the DC1. we watch the "/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol" folder and if there is any change, (add, modify or delete), we run "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" and we push those changes to other DCs using rsync. We have created a shell script that is put in rc.local so that this starts even if the server reboots. We chose

On 6/22/2017 9:41 AM, Anantha Raghava via samba wrote: > Hi, > > No solutions to get out of this? > Not sure exactly what your issue is but based on your error Samba is reporting the following on that particular Policy; * Lost Allow Object and Container inheritance on each ACE. * Create Owner missing ACE and you have Built in Administrators with an ACE * You have the

Hi, > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:52:06 +0530 > Anantha Raghava via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:37:21 +0530 >>> Anantha Raghava via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thanks for clarification. >>>> >>>>