similar to: problems with Samba 4.7 in existing (Samba 4.2 based) domain

Pada Min, 18 Agu 2024 pukul 23.23 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:02 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > it at dc4:~$ sudo dpkg -l | grep -E > > 'samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient|acl|attr|bind9' > > ii acl

Pada Min, 18 Agu 2024 pukul 16.38 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:21:14 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for your response > > > > Is it ok to have 2 records on the > > >

On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:02 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > it at dc4:~$ sudo dpkg -l | grep -E > 'samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient|acl|attr|bind9' > ii acl 2.2.53-6 > > amd64 access control > list - utilities > ii attr

Pada Sen, 19 Agu 2024 pukul 16.36 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for your response ? > > > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > > 4.20, is there any

On 18/03/2024 15:44, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > > I would like to add BitLocker integration to the three DCs we have running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. > > The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 and Domain level 2008_R2. > > Can I confirm that the procedure to upgrade the three DCs is as follows:- > > 1) backup > 2) upgrade

who can tell me how to do TDM over enthernet ? pc a connect pc b only use TDM card? thank you John. -----????----- ???: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]?? asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com ????: 2004?12?23? 11:47 ???: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com ??: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 336 Send Asterisk-Users mailing list

Hello, I would like to add BitLocker integration to the three DCs we have running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 and Domain level 2008_R2. Can I confirm that the procedure to upgrade the three DCs is as follows:- 1) backup 2) upgrade domain and forest to latest 2012_R2 3) upgrade the schema to latest 2012_R2 Also, in what

Not sure what Bitlocker integration you are referring to. Saving bitlocker recovery keys does work for me with schema version 47. Regards, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Paul Littlefield via samba Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. M?rz 2024 18:14 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Raise Domain Level, Forest Level

On 20-03-2024 18:14, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > On 18/03/2024 15:44, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: >> >> I would like to add BitLocker integration to the three DCs we have >> running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. >> >> The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 >> and Domain level 2008_R2. >> >> Can I

Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version

Hai Mason,   I had a look at the debug output.   on 1) why around 15-16 second, that i really dont know. im trying to figure that out. on 2) if DNS is inconsistance, that everything is unrelayable. This is really the first the that needs fixing. then we look again at the replication.   The debug output still shows several messages about zones in flat files. I still do believe also that this

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:21:14 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > Thanks for your response > > Is it ok to have 2 records on the > CN=DC4,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=nicho,DC=com > ? Yes > > 20.04 comes with Samba 4.15.13, so where did you get the 4.19.5 > packages from ? > deb

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > Thanks for your response ? > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > 4.20, is there any posibilities that i can join the new samba machine > (DC6) to the DC4 ? Possibly, try it. > If I rebuild new machine, what data will be lost

Hello folks, I'm having trouble configuring Asterisk to play an "invalid extension" message to anyone dialing an undefined extension. First I tried using the 'i' pseudo-extension, but it didn't work at all; searching the wiki I found that page: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20i%20extension where it basically says that the 'i'

Great ! ???????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 15:30 -0200, Lucas Peruchi wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I have an environment with 4 servers samba 4 and yesterday one of > them died, I tried removing it and not found, then recreated the > server with the same name and joined him as a DC, however, he created > a new uuid and sync entres servers I stopped, I had to force a forced > sync: > > #

Until yesterday replication between my two DCs (boa and cobra) was running fine. Now I am observing one direction boa->cobra being stuck. I noticed this with a missing update of a DNS entry, but samba-tool drs showrepl confirms? Output of cobra shows plenty entries like the following (including just he first of each type): ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ====

Help please :-) I got the following error message after replacing one of my DCs -------------------------- Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for ncacn_ip_tcp:192.168.1.191[49153,seal,krb5,target_hostname=56bc02aa-5817-400a

Hello Louis, Am 24.04.2015 um 17:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > Hai.. > > Just tested an upgrade of 4.1.17 to 4.2.1 > result... Fail.. > > setup, > Debian wheezy, sernet samba packages. > 2 clean installed DC's and 1 windows 7 pc joined. > resolv.conf setup > DC1 : namserver DC2 then DC1. > DC2: namserver DC1 then DC2. > > stopped samba on both

Ah.. I had a "member break down" .. Out of the blue,.. Kerberos problem, but pretty simple to fix. kinit Administrator Check your spn of the ad server with : samba-tool spn list DC_HOSTNAME$ Check keytab klist -ke /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab Can you check this. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at