similar to: High CPU While Loading RSAT Active Directory Users and Computers

Hi, My Samba AD-DC installation is using CPU all time on a process. I'm trying everything to fix it, but without success. It started when using it on Ubuntu 16.04, I upgraded o Ubuntu 18.04, and now Ubuntu 18.10, that is using Samba 4.8.4 and the problem persist. Using samba-tool process, I could see that the process using resources is CLDAP. I did samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs samba-tool

Jessie also has the problem, even before the meltdown patches. The kernel 3.16.x had ksoftirqd probems, eating up cpu cicles. Make sure you use kernel 4.9.0-6 And i suggest move up to samba 4.7.x or 4.7.4 from debian/buster, Or use my 4.6.12/4.7.6 packages for stretch, or ask if Tranquil.it can make them. The 4.6.14 is still in the make atm for stretch, 4.6.14 for jessie is done. And last,

Hi Louis, Move up to 4.7 is planned soon but I'm little scared to update bridgehead if it actually had performance problem. I would like to fix all problem before updating. My smb.conf is really simple: [global] workgroup = PR realm = pr.educationetformation.fr netbios name = DC000 server role = active directory domain controller bind interfaces only

Hi everybody ! I am encountering performance problem on my bridgehead DC. I have 19 DC (Debian Stretch / Samba 4.6.7 from Tranquil.it repo) and they all synchronized on a main bridgehead DC. This performance problem first appears when the bridgehead DC was on Debian Jessie and kernel was updated with meltdown/spectre patch from Debian (3.16.51-3+deb8u1) I added "nopti" option to grub

Dear All, We're running smbd "Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu", and it populates our log files with these two lines per every connect: === [2016/07/18 18:42:31.544726, 1] ../source3/printing/printer_list.c:234(printer_list_get_last_refresh) Failed to fetch record! [2016/07/18 18:42:31.544780, 1] ../source3/smbd/server_reload.c:69(delete_and_reload_printers) pcap cache not loaded

Hai, Can you tell the following that helps. OS ? Samba Version? ( pre-builded or source ) Kernel version? I think you need to wait for 4.9.4 if all patches ive seen on vfs_fruit are getting in. These might help. Go through bugzilla, you might find more about this here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

Listing directories with many files (10000+) from a Windows client is nociceably slower when vfs_fruit is enabled on the samba server compared to the same setup without vfs_fruit. On my setup it's roughly 2.5 times slower. To me it looks like this is caused by the getxattr call which is only present with vfs_fruit activated and introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s per listed

I got more information ,after enable log_level to 10: ``` push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3 push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3 Security token: (NULL) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Adding cache entry with key=[ACCT_POL/password history] and timeout=[Thu Jan 1 03:00:00 AM 1970 MSK]

Hi, I added these lines to smb.conf: kernel op locks = false op locks = false strict locking = true so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W

Sure. ``` [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE server string = dns proxy = no interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 # new options log level = 5 netbios name = FILES #panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d server role = STANDALONE SERVER local master = no security = user encrypt passwords =

Hello, I'm using samba 4.7.3 to run an AD and I'm currently having issues with the MIT kerberos because it stops some time after starting (and apparently working correctly) without logging nothing out of the ordinary. My setup has 2 DC: one in an ubuntu 12.04 with version 4.1.9 (which we're migrating from) and the one I mentioned in CentOS 7 (which will be the only DC in the future).

I've been trying to determine if a file is locked by samba from unix. Is there some magic incantation to find this? E.g. if someone is copying a file in from a windows system via samba. I'm using the default locking parameters on 3.0.10 with a 2.6 kernel. I've tried checking posix byte ranges, posix locking, and kernel op locks. Here is my test program: #include <sys/types.h>

Hi I look at list archives and at samba docs but I did not found ... please can some one help me? I have to write a unix program that need to check if it can write to a file and place the apropriate locks before write. Those files are in a Samba share. I intend to use fcntl() function to check and set the locks. I wrote a test program to see if the fcntl() function can see the samba locks

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 22:21 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:58:33PM +0000, Jon Gerdes wrote: > > winbind has a concept of offline and online but I don't know what > > that > > is, nor how nss works with it. I've tried using smbcontrol to tell > > winbind it is offline or online but that does not seem to work. > > Restarting

The parts of klibc specific to the mips architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 8dc79563c06020d8844b9e9b821741828039b59e tree b957c8fb1fddf486f5c26b1880726051d4f6aaad parent bc9b363b31d301ab94c115cccc2e079c0d318498 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:31 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Al, Could this be included in the vfs queue? This patch adds ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy XFS pre-allocation ioctls (XFS_IOC_*RESVP*). The implementation effectively invokes sys_fallocate for the new ioctls. Also handles the compat_ioctl case. Note: These legacy ioctls are also implemented by OCFS2. Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain <me at ankitjain.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph

Hi, I run a fresh debian 7 / samba 4.1 setup (using sernet's samba build). I have a share /daten with acls. When I do (locally) getfacl /daten/ -R > /dev/null the system hangs at 100% cpu wait with the samba process: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 3451 root 20 0 518m 38m 6796 S 59,8 1,9 136:46.90 samba When I do the same using the "-n"

Hi, Here is some output of "strace -ff -p" to the process using ~100% CPU writev(75, [{"\250\r\0\0\2\0\0\0S-1-5-21-2097307442-3435"..., 3496}], 1) = 3496 epoll_wait(9, {{EPOLLIN, {u32=2539833808, u64=140271876753872}}}, 1, 30000) = 1 readv(91, [{"\34\0\0\0\0\0\0\0rT\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 2092}], 1) = 2092 gettimeofday({1419854003, 222035},

On 29/12/14 12:02, Bruno Andrade wrote: > Hi again, > > Sorry, I forgot to include the fd used... > > 13 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=EXAMPLE,DC=COM.ldb > 16 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/metadata.tdb > > the others refers to /var/run/samba/winbindd/pipe > > Regards, > Bruno Andrade. > > On 12/29/2014 11:56 AM, Bruno Andrade wrote:

On 29/12/14 14:58, Bruno Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I already thought about it. > > I have the sernet repo installed.. Is possible to yum update and jump > from 4.1.6 to 4.1.14 directly, without problems or should I follow some > kind of procedure to avoid future problems? > > Regards, > Bruno Andrade. > > On 12/29/2014 01:46 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>