similar to: add machine script not running

Thanks for your response Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > I suppose the obvious question is, is the script executable ? It is. It's a simple perl script with +x. I can exec it from the comande line like /usr/local/bin/addworkstation.pl foo$ which creates the machin account like it should. I've also

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:51 +0100 > "Daniel Berteaud" <daniel at firewall-services.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response > > > > Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > > > > > I

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:20:03 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Now, the "funny" thing is that, it did work, something like 3 times > in over 50 tries. It's not just the config because, once it worked, I > removed the same workstation from the domain, removed the LDAP entry, > made no configuration change, not service restart and

Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: > If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but everything > else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part of the > trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first and do > step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with the Same Hostname", > (the mkdir of non-existent dir,

On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but >> everything else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part >> of the trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first >> and do step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from > > which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? > Yes, there are afr xattrs that determine the heal direction for each > file. The good copy

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 09:35 CET, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> a écrit: > > This may have nothing to do with Samba, if you are running sssd, then > this will be doing the authentication. sssd was providing the NSS -> LDAP layer, just like nss-ldap would do (it also provides a pam module equivalent to pam-ldap for UNIX accounts) > If you are running sssd, try

Le 15/11/2017 à 19:23, Andrew Bartlett via samba a écrit : >> You have 'add machine script = /usr/local/bin/addworkstation.pl "%u"' >> Try removing the double quotes. >> >> There isn't doesn't see to be anything else really wrong with your >> smb.conf. >> > G'Day Rowland, > > While it is possible our parsing of the smb.conf

Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >> > > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick > with a wiped FS, and using > > gluster volume remove-brick vmstore

Hi everyone. I'm running a simple Gluster setup like this: ? * Replicate 2x1 ? * Only 2 nodes, with one brick each ? * Nodes are CentOS 7.0, uising GlusterFS 3.5.3 (yes, I know it's old, I just can't upgrade right now) No sharding or anything "fancy". This Gluster volume is used to host VM images, and are used by both nodes (which are gluster server and clients).

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:51 +0100 "Daniel Berteaud" <daniel at firewall-services.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response > > Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > > > I suppose the obvious question is, is the script executable ? > > It is. It's a simple perl script with

Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the .glusterfs > directory) and reconnect ? > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick with a wiped FS, and using gluster volume remove-brick vmstore replica 1 master1:/mnt/bricks/vmstore gluster volume add-brick myvol replica 2

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 09:53 +0100, Daniel Berteaud via samba wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 09:35 CET, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> a écrit: > > > > This may have nothing to do with Samba, if you are running sssd, then > > this will be doing the authentication. > > sssd was providing the NSS -> LDAP layer, just like nss-ldap would do > (it

On 11/15/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >>> >>> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >>> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >>> >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node,

I solved the mystery, but not the problem. The problem is that there's an unclosed quote somewhere in those 5 additional records I'm trying to access. So read.csv is reading million-character fields. It's slow at that. That mystery solved. However, the the problem persists: how to fix what is obvious to the naked eye - a quote not adjacent to a comma - but that read.csv can't

Hi Dave, That's rather frustrating. I've found vroom (from the package vroom) to be helpful with large files like this. Does the following give you any better luck? vroom(file_name, delim = ",", skip = 2459465, n_max = 5) Of course, when you know you've got errors & the files are big like that it can take a bit of work resolving things. The command line tools awk

data.table's fread is also fast. Not sure about error handling. But I can merge 300 csvs with a total of 0.5m lines and 50 columns in a couple of minutes versus a lifetime with read.csv or readr::read_csv On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, 16:19 Stevie Pederson, <stephen.pederson.au at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > That's rather frustrating. I've found vroom (from the package

On 11/17/2017 03:41 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > >> On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: >>> Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from >>> which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? >> Yes, there are afr

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:25:11 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm running samba 3.6.3 (on Ubuntu 12.04). This server is acting as > an old style NT4 domain using samba as backend. Machine accounts are > created using a script, called by samba (add machine script). > Everything is working great. > > Now, I want to keep

Am 23.09.13 16:00, schrieb Daniel Berteaud: > Le vendredi 20 septembre 2013 à 15:31 +0200, Thomas Stein a écrit : >> Hello. >> >> Is someone performing incremental backups via libvirt for qemu/kvm >> machines? I'm still having a hard time to >> find a nice procedure. I mean is it possible to make a full backup of an >> image on monday a do the next