similar to: Fwd: Re: Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64

Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 10:03:03 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:51:14 +0100 > > "Peter Fodrek,ml. via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Dear Mr. Cardon! > > Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba > > > > napísali: > > > > IO would like to ask for help with

Dear Mr. Cardon! Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba napísali: > > > IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version > > 4.7.0-git. > > 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not > > authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain > > > > in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb

Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:07:13 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:39:10 +0100 > > wrote: > > > You should have said that in the first place, I thought it was a > > > CIFS problem ;-) > > > > > > Can you please post your smb.conf > > > > it is set by yast and its only content is as follows. It may be

On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:38:00 +0100 wrote: > Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 11:07:13 CET Rowland Penny via samba > napísali: > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:39:10 +0100 > > > > wrote: > > > > You should have said that in the first place, I thought it was a > > > > CIFS problem ;-) > > > > > > > > Can you please post your smb.conf

Dear Samba experts, IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version 4.7.0-git. 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb version only vorks if set to 1.0 //192.168.1.131/shares /home/fodrek/shares cifs credentials=/home/fodrek/

Dear Mr. Chisnall! thank you for you help V Nedeľa, 26. máj 2013 o 15:33 +0100, David Chisnall napísal(a): > On 26 May 2013, at 14:42, Peter Fodrek-CHELLO <peter.fodrek at chello.sk> wrote: > > > We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code > > into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. > If you want to get your

Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/Backend/compiler_backe nd/ But Beignet does not

Dear LLVM users and developers, We have been read that there is possible to translate from C++ to another language using Clang http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9900240/how-to-use-clang-to-translate-from-c-to-another-language We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. I would like to be informed

Hi all. I have an issue with T.38 and re-invites. Topology: provider -> A (asterisk 1.6) -> B (asterisk 1.6) -> extension -> -> (software fax, gateway whatever). When between A and B trunk is canreinvite=no everything is working smooth. When I switch canreinvite to yes, it stop working. Do you have any idea where the issue can be? Any help will be much appreciated. Marek Soha

Hi All, 2 of my summer interns (Aimee Dipietro and Greg Simpson) used their time over the summer to resurrect the LLVM C Backend: https://github.com/draperlaboratory/llvm-cbe Improvements include recovery of simple for/while loops (instead of goto), better variable naming, inline asm support, and making it work on a more recent version of llvm. I believe they used the repository here as a

People who have reported compilation failures with gcc 4.7.0 - what is the version of binutils that goes along with it? There has been a very serious bug uncovered in binutils 2.22.52.0.[12] which probably affects Syslinux... -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi developers, Could someone take a look at this bug report? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11916 It's affecting Fedora (we tend to bite the bullet and switch to the upcoming GCC release earlier than other distributions); currently LLVM cannot be rebuilt against our development branch, which is troublesome because a recent Ocaml upgrade

You can try the --fix option for the DB check, but it didn't work for me.  If not and you have a lot of groups then you probably need to improve my script to deal with the create, rename and delete group operations. Thanks, Arthur This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, including PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. If you are not the intended recipient, any use or

Can you provide a bit more logs? At first glance, it doesn't seem quite related to group memberships. Cheers, Garming On 29/09/17 22:07, gizmo via samba wrote: > Hallo, > we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7. > I updated 4 of them to sernet-samba 4.7.0, one after the other, checked replication, everything seemed to be ok. > One day later a colleague

Hello Community, after an upgrade from samba 4.6.7 to samba 4.7.0, now i have a replication issue on my second domain controller. When i type "samba-tool drs showrepl" all correctly synced, except the following: ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mydomain,DC=de Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via RPC DSA object GUID: 2abe9f52-9cd5-43c8-9fc2-a67eba27f551 Last attempt @ Wed

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:48:13 +0000 "Mogane, Ratanang Johannes, Vodacom South Africa (External)" <Ratanang.Mogane at vcontractor.co.za> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I have run : > ./configure > > And at the end the following messages were found which means it needs > the dependency. Correct? > > /opt/samba-4.7.0/source4/lib/tls/wscript:51: error: Building

Hi, We are in the process of migrating our samba AD (4.1.0pre1-GIT-6be458d) to the latest 4.7.0 release. In the process we want to switch from the BIND_DLZ to the internal dns server. I have done some experiments in our test environment and everything seems to work ok, but I'm not sure how to handle the dns backend change. Is it just the case of running samba_upgradedns

On 25/10/17 13:22, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 10/25/2017 6:22 AM, Lukasz Zalewski via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> We are in the process of migrating our samba AD >> (4.1.0pre1-GIT-6be458d) to the latest 4.7.0 release. In the process we >> want to switch from the BIND_DLZ to the internal dns server. >> >> I have done some experiments in our test environment and

On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 14:10 +0300, Evgeniy Semenov via samba wrote: > Hallo, > > I encountered a similar problem. > > I created a test environment with two domain controllers (copy from a > working environment). I tried to join a read-only domain controller. > Unsuccessfully. Samba-tool fell with a error: There are two issues, one masking the other. The cleanup on the

Hi Rowland Thanks for the link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage It should fix the Firewall authentication problem. I like to find out if I can rename the Domain name of the DC when I move it to the new DC like currently it is IUMNET.EDU.NA <http://iumnet.edu.na/> but my GApps domain name is IUM.EDU.NA <http://ium.edu.na/> and I like to use the same on my new