similar to: Samba 4.7.1 - ldap multi process - excessive processes

Hi, It's a known issue, where the extent of memory accumulation for processes wasn't understood (large chunks of memory, which tend to fail to be shared) until just after the release froze. There are patches upstream to implement a prefork process model (with a fixed number of waiting processes) and should be available in 4.8. In saying that, some considerations could be made for

Yes it could be interesting. I want to use it to send the password has an API for other software. I currently use the "Store passwords using reversible encryption" to use my API. But I do not like this operation. I then use "http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/self-service-password" with the " post hook" Your patch it allows you also to retrieve the user

Hi, what are the following messages supposed to tell me and does this indicate a problem? # systemctl status cyrus-imapd [...] master[3766]: unable to setsocketopt(IP_TOS): Operation not supported master[3766]: unable to setsocketopt(IP_TOS): Operation not supported [...] Exim says it can not connect to the lmtp socket even when selinux doesn?t get in the way. The configuration looks like

Hello, Thanks for the feedback Garming!!! 👍 On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:35 AM Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > While I think we have most of the 2012 schema problems under control > now, there's still quite a bit of work to get the functional level > things working. In order to actually raise the level, we still need to > implement a number of

interesting ! Let me take a closer look at that. I must send passwords in Office 365 and Google Apps. Currently, My script works but it requires that Samba is configured with the "Plain text Password" option. I want to change that. "Check password script" could solve my problem. "http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/self-service-password" with " post

Thanks Rowland and Garming for your help!! How about "another DC", or 'a second DC' ? Ok. Got it! :D Alternatively, re-joining the domain controller (or joining a new DC and > demoting the old one) probably works because I believe there is code to > handle this case. I re-joined (remove secrets.tdb and .lbd, copy idmap from existing DC...) and now works properly!

Hi Yes, active directory Simon Le 10/06/2016 03:37, Garming Sam a écrit : > Hi, > > Are you running Samba active directory? > > > Cheers, > > Garming > > On 10/06/16 00:28, blog at lesfourmisduweb.org wrote: >> Hello >> >> I Can not run a "check password script" in smb.conf >> Somebody can you tell me if this is depecated?

Le 10/06/2016 13:12, garming at catalyst.net.nz a écrit : > That sounds somewhat out of scope of the original parameter. A further parameter can he do this function ? > I would be > happy to explain how the patches could be modified to send the username > (possibly as the first argument to the script). It shouldn't be a > particularly difficult change, but I'd have to look

This is almost certainly because of a build artifact. python/samba/netcmd/time.py was renamed to nettime.py but there is likely to be a time.pyc file floating around in your directories. The reason it was renamed was so that the samba tool time command wasn't confused with the python time module, but this necessarily causes issues with existing installs unfortunately. The fix is mostly

> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:14:29 +0100 > From: Dr J Austin <ja at maui.jaa.org.uk> > > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Dr J Austin wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> >>> Am 11.08.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Dr J Austin: >>>> >>>> Hi Alexander >>>> >>>> [root

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:07:29 +1300 Garming Sam via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/10/18 1:26 AM, Julien Ropé via samba wrote: > > > >  The deployment works, and computers seems to interact with the > > RODCs as they should, but sometimes computers leave the domain > > after a password change. > > > >  This seems to

Hi Denis, > could you please take a look at which process is taking so much RAM? > Is there a pile of smbd process around? If you are using Bind-dlz, how > much memory named is eating? Is is the increase in RAM consumption is > linear over time? > > If it is a "samba" process that is eating all the RAM, please check > the PID and the samba-tool processes

> I'm a bit confused by this concept. For the term byte, I use the "archaic" definition in the C (and C++) standard (section 3.6): addressable unit of data storage large enough to hold any member of the basic character set of the execution environment /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen [mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk] Sent: den 19 oktober

On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: >> non-8-bit byte I'm a bit confused by this concept. I'm aware of the archaic meaning of the word byte, but it has meant 8 bits for the last 30 years. There's even an ISO/IEC standard. I know of architectures like Texas' C55x DSPs that address 16 bits at a time, but even their

On 9/24/2016 7:32 AM, Denis Cardon wrote: > > the job of the samba_kcc script is to create the ntdsConnection > objects. Afterward the repsFrom/repsTo attribute are created in > accordance with the ntdsConnection objects (you can force the creation > using samba-tool drs replicate although). You can check that the > process is asynchronous when you join a new DC, the INBOUND

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:45:39 +1300 Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > > On 23/10/18 9:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:07:29 +1300 > > Garming Sam via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 20/10/18 1:26 AM, Julien Ropé via samba wrote: > >>>  The

Hi all, I am facing facing performance issues with our web servers which is working for concurrent 250 requests properly and then stops responding when the requests are more than 250 . The current configuration parameters are as follows : apachectl -version Server version: Apache/2.0.52 Server built: Jan 30 2007 09:56:16 Kernel : 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64

Basically, the way puppet installs things things with /usr/bin/apt-get -q -y -o DPkg::Options::=--force-confold install <package_name> fails due to authentication WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated But if I do it from an ssh console normally, using apt-get install <package_name> it works fine without issues. Is there a way to change how puppet uses the

Hello All, I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design. I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail processes, forking a new processes for each new client connection. Talking in the #dovecot channel I was gave a scenario of a system supporting ~40k users with 4 servers

On 01/03/16 21:35, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > This new segfault seems unrelated to the previous one. It's probably > something like a double free, which typically shouldn't be that hard to > fix. If you try running the tool under valgrind, it should provide > enough information to fix the issue. > > > Cheers, > > Garming > Who or what is