similar to: updating TDB user/group entries to RID

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:17:56 +0200 Oleg Cherkasov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if there are any tools to simplify transition from TDB to > RID on existing system in production. Long story short, by mistake > one of our servers were configured with default idmap set to a range: > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * :

On 06. aug. 2018 16:37, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: >> >> This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 >> installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to >> shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server >> 2008R2.  Everything has

I used to put a line in rc.local to email root that my server rebooted. Does anyone have a nice systemd unit file to do the same? Also useful would be a shutdown email with the output of uptime. (I usually do that manually when rebooting for a kernel update.)

Background: FREEBSD 11.2 - SAMBA 4.10.15 Hello everyone, Good evening/afternoon/morning. I am trying to "reuse" the TDB database to my portal, where I want to store basically 3 information: IP address , Name, TimeStamp - where IP would be the KEY and "NAME,TIMESTAMP" would be the VALUE. I am using the tdbtool to insert/store data successfully (like the example below)

I think we're suffering from bug 8641 at the moment: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8641 where the netsamlogon_cache.tdb entries are not expiring. We use AD groups for our (redhat) server auth, and also use server-side group auth for NFS (with the --manage-gids flag). So if a user is not in a group on the server, they're denied access to files as per group permissions.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:36:23PM +0200, Peter Eriksson via samba wrote: > For what it’s worth you are not alone in seeing similar problems with Samba and gencache. > > Our site has some 110K users (university with staff & students (including former ones), and currently around 2000 active (SMB) clients connecting to 5 different Samba servers (around 400-500 clients per server).

On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 12:36 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 08:33:33PM -0300, Suporte - KONNTROL via > samba wrote: > > Background: FREEBSD 11.2 - SAMBA 4.10.15 > > > > Hello everyone, > > Good evening/afternoon/morning. > > > > I am trying to "reuse" the TDB database to my portal, where I want > > to

Is it normal that the gencache.tdb should grow and grow “forever” and fill up with “RA/<hex>” posts? I’ve been investigating why our Samba 4.7.3 servers (happened with older version 4 servers too) would use such insane amounts of memory on our FreeBSD 11.1 servers (we see smbd processes using hundreds of megabytes of RAM and up to 5GB virtual memory). Anyway, one part that seems to use

Hi, I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got listed twice with pdbedit. (http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg109110.html) Without much hope in fixing it, I am planning to re-generating passdb.tdb on my PDC by: (1)exporting tdbsam to smbpasswd backend (2)delete passdb.tdb (3)re-import smbpasswd to tdbsam backend With the command `

I had to remove reference to some printer drivers via tdbtool on ntdrivers.tdb. 1. Do I need to restart smbd and nmbd to make these changes take effect? 2. If I restart smbd and nmbd will connected users get disconnected?

Hi, This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server 2008R2.  Everything has been running ok for last few year.  I have been upgrading Samba and FreeBSD installations and on last Friday upgraded to the latest packages from

If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Cc: "Oleg Cherkasov"

Hi, we are using samba 3.0.24 as a printspooler for 80 network printers with a 500kB ntprinters.tdb for some years now. When we recently restarted samba we noticed that the ntprinters.tdb automatically shrinked to 24kB and printing was no longer possible. tdbdump of the original tdb-file is impossible too: "Failed to open ntprinters.tdb" The strange thing about this: we can solve

I may have a clue. I have two servers running Samba 3.2.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. On the Member Server when I access the [Projects] share everything works as expected. When I access the [Windows] share I get prompted for a user name and password but no combination

Hello All -- We are trying to consolidate our printer management from a series of NT print servers to a series of Samba ones, in a global network with ten offices and about 150 printers. All printing is PostScript and goes to HP and Canon printers over lpd through custom 'if' filters which do accounting. To help this we're trying to automate the printer and driver registration

Hi, I've set a share using samba, connected it to my Active Directory, and now I'm having problems when I copy files into this share. To setup the AD connection I've followed https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member, and installed it into my Debian 9 install using APT, after https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Distribution-specific_Package_Installation. With

Every now and then I get an alert like this one. I have no clue what this "rear" subsystem is, or why madam would be trying to write to its log file. Can anyone enlighten me? thanks in advance! ------------------------- SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/mdadm from write access on the file /var/log/rear/rear-fcshome.log.lockless. ***** Plugin restorecon (93.9 confidence) suggests

W dniu 13.09.2018 o?22:19, Oleg Cherkasov pisze: > On 13. sep. 2018 21:02, Marcin Trendota wrote: >> >> There is nginx on port 80. >> I've turned off SELinux for testing purposes. >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap chamber -p80 >> [...] >> PORT?? STATE SERVICE >> 80/tcp open? http >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap -p80

HiWe have two Windows servers (one active, one standby) that we keep in sync by using ROBOCOPY to do a differential copy every night. The options make sure that only new or altered files are transferred, and deleted ?master? files also is deleted on the standby server. Now I want to relocate a couple of shares from the active server to a Samba 4.20 server. The shares are up and working as they

Thank you so much for the prompt response and the valuable comments. We are using a pretty much unmodified Zentyal installation, which in its own turn sets everything up for a Samba DC. It might be a good idea for us to move away from that, if Zentyal uses an EOL-version of Samba.. You were absolutely right about the sign-in part! Almost all of us work from home in these special days, so