similar to: Fwd: Cannot connect to Samba share (4.1.11) from Windows 10

Dear all, Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet support > except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for now disabling > SMB2/3 on the Windows 10 client is your best, if not ideal, option. > > Instructions for doing.this can be found > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 "\(lists\) Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet > > support except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for > > now disabling SMB2/3 on the Windows 10

Given an existing NT4 Samba 4 DC, a recently upgraded Win10 machine can no longer access NETLOGON to authenticate to the network. This lead to the research revealing that my Samba4 PDC SMB.CONF must be changed to limit MAX PROTOCOL = NT1 to avoid negotiating a version of SMB2 from Win10 that Samba4 can't resolve. Doing this broke authentication via other resources that no longer support NT1,

I am migrating an old but functional Samba 3.3.4 smbpasswd-based PDC to a new Samba 4.0-based VM. I planned to build the 4.0 as a BDC and then simply dcpromo it to my PDC, and then retire the old server. But I've come across two problems for which I'm needing some guidance. I've built the 4.0 box, extracted the original domain SID, and joined the machine to the domain. I can log into

* sigh * this is becoming an exercise in frustration. * Performing a direct migration of my Samba 3.3.4 box by copying .tdb and related files to the new machine looks like a non-starter, as the group_mappings file went from an ldb to a .tdb format, and it appears the only conversion occurs during an in-place version upgrade. * The next step, it appears, looks to be some sort of upgrade to the

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers, how can I tell what the default protocols are? Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel? Chris On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote: >> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the >> main host

Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew

Hello, I've recently set up Samba (4.12.3) on Arch Linux as the target for Time Machine backups for a couple of Macs. Shortly thereafter I started seeing OOMs whenever a backup would start. I stumbled upon disabling encryption on the server (i.e. changing "smb encrypt" from "required" to "off") to prevent this issue. After further digging, I'm able to

01.04.2024 13:56, Jones Syue ???: >> I can't say for sure but I *think* each time the client is windows server 2012. > > Looks good :) If run this script[1] to test multiple dialects, found only > SMB3_00 and SMB3_02 has this "(sign_algo_id=1)", and per doc[2] it could > be happend with ws2012 and ws2012r2. This *is* 2012 r2. The protocol version it negotiates is

A couple of other issues to keep in mind... Aside from the fact that the errors suggest your W10 box is trying to join an AD domain, W10 also defaults to a protocol of SMB 3.3 which Samba 3.x does not support. If you resolve the issue wherein W10 thinks it is joining an AD domain, there's a strong possibility (if not certainty) you will then see errors in the log of the W10 box indicating

Hi, Currently, we have at my job a Samba 4 AD DC with 2 DC are running over Samba 4.1.11 version. I know both servers are out date. I want to update this version to the latest version (4.9.3), but I'm not confident about the process to do it. I've read on wiki.samba.org that is recommended read all release notes to version x.x.0 and all release notes the latest version you pretend update

I've built and made updated tags for my Samba 4.1.x RPM building tools at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/, especially the the https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.1.x-srpm with tags for the recent secuity patches in the 4.1.11 release. I'm not publishing RPM's because I'm not secure enough in my environments for building and maintaining production binaries. I'm making them

Opening folders containing 10K files totaling 20GB is slow (takes 1.5 - 2.0 minutes) in FreeBSD 9.2 with Samba 4.1.11 on a system with 32GB RAM and a newer Xeon processor. Server is a standalone server that I'm using for testing. I am using nfsv4 acls. I used the procsystime dtrace script from here: http://www.brendangregg.com/DTrace/procsystime with the following syntax: procsystime -n smbd

Join new DC (from virtual machine) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory (or 2. from 2 vm!) with bind/dhcp/.. Then demote old DC https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC and install (clean) 4.9.3, then join it again, demote vm,.. 01.12.2018 0:40, Igor Sousa via samba пишет: > I've tried use samba-tool domain backup, but the

We have been experiencing a debilitating 'bug' in samba where something is causing a flood of the messages seen below in smbstatus and the network drives ( in our case N: ) on all clients become unresponsive. In fact, the entire client becomes unresponsive, essentially making them unusable until samba is restarted. We first saw this and connected it to the following open bug in samba

Dear All, Anyone have any hints on bugs affecting samba 4.1.11 acting as a member server? I've some complain about Office 2013/365 They said that network share are not available and force to exit and documentation recovery are not possible. (But as I can see the network are still working fine...) The same configuration on samba 3.6.x are working without problem. Below are my configuration

Thanks for your help and replies. Yes, I meant "store dos attributes". It's pretty clear now that I need to keep the parameter 'store dos attributes=no' since 1) the server is an AD member server and 2) the map* parameters don't do the right thing under ZFS / NFSV4 ACLs. I've read that the steps Klaus Hartnegg listed resolves the issue on ZFS on Linux; however, I

Hello, Per the wiki "When the first DC with a newer version than 4.1.11 is started, these deleted objects are removed. Depending on the amount, this may result in a slow performance until all left objects of previous version are removed." When I upgrade my first DC should I give it several hours to delete these entries and sync before updating the others? Any harm in updating