similar to: samba getting stuck, highwatermark replication issue?

On Mon, August 24, 2020 13:51 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > It isn't a PDC, that is something quite different ;-) > I know, but it is a lot shorter to write than the DC possessing the PDC FSMO role. > It is your first DC. Not really, I have been working with MS AD Domains since NT 3.51, or whatever it was called back then. This one just happens to be the one I am currently

On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:50, Rowland penny wrote: > Port 137 should only be used by Samba nmb, so has nmbd somehow > been started ? No. The error is not caused by anything else listening on 137. [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# netstat -an | grep -i listen tcp4 0 0 192.168.18.162.22 *.* LISTEN tcp4 0 0 192.168.216.162.22 *.*

We have set up a Samba-4.3 AD-DC on a FreeBSD-10.3 BHyve guest configured with UFS stoarge. The samba_server is provisioned and we can join the Domain and configure the server remotely using MMC snap-ins running on a MS Win-v7Pro workstation. We are at the point where we are implementing roaming profiles. We have followed the instructions found at:

This problem has several elements but it did not evidence itself until we moved from a MicroSoft AD-DC to a Samba AD-DC. The environment is is a FreeBSD-10.3 Bhyve VM hosted on a 16 core host also running FreeBSD-10.3. The version of Samba is 4.3.11 obtained through FreeBSD ports. The AD clients are all running MSWin7pro patched up-to-date. Roaming profiles are in use. We have an intermittent

On Wed, April 19, 2017 16:22, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Apple has had massively disruptive changes on OS X and iOS. Windows > has had a fairly disruptive set of changes in Windows 10. About the > only things that don't change are industrial OS's. > I have no idea how this reference applies to my earlier post. We do not use Apple or Windows servers and the desktop

On Tue, August 9, 2016 22:14, Mark Foley wrote: > Can Samba4 be used for AD/DC with virtual machines? For example, I > have a Ubuntu domain member > and it currently does AD authentication for users. I would like to > run this computer as a VM > also hosting Windows 7, which I would also like the Windows 7 user(s) > to AD authenticate. > > One problem I foresee is joining

On Thu, April 2, 2015 15:25, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> >> Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding >> release names would have been nice. > > We did. > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html > > You mean this? On: Sun Feb 22 23:19:42 UTC 2015

On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 12:52 +0200, mj wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for chiming in! > > On 10/14/2017 12:16 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > We are carefully following the reports here, but we do expect > > replication should be much more stable with Samba 4.7. > > OK, that's interesting, because I actually wanted to upgrade ASAP, but > (the

I am trying to replicate a samba-4.3 DC [192.168.8.65] to a newly joined samba-4.10 DC. I am using rsync as described in the samba wiki, excepting that I am using a remote shell (ssh) with the root user and password-less logins. When I run the command below from the 4.10 DC I get acl errors as shown below. rsync -XAavz --delete-after --rsh='ssh' [192.168.8.65]:/var/db/samba4/sysvol

On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:46, Rowland penny wrote: > One problem is that ZFS uses NFSv4ACLS and a Samba AD doesn't, it > expects POSIX ACLS, there also is a possibility that xattr may be > another problem. > > Try reading this: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12912 > I have worked with Timur on this very problem in the past. And he has produced in

Hi Andrew, Thanks for chiming in! On 10/14/2017 12:16 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > We are carefully following the reports here, but we do expect > replication should be much more stable with Samba 4.7. OK, that's interesting, because I actually wanted to upgrade ASAP, but (the few) 4.7-upgrade experiences that have been posted, are mostly about replication issues after

On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 09:17 +0200, mj via samba wrote: > Hi all, James, > > After following James' suggestions fixing the several dbcheck errors, > and having observed things for a few days, I'd like to update this > issue, and hope for some new input again. :-) > > Summary: three DCs, all three running Version > 4.5.10-SerNet-Debian-16.wheezy, samba-tool

On 10/10/2017 3:14 AM, mj via samba wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > On 10/09/2017 08:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > >> You should be able to fix the 'replPropertyMetaData' errors with; >> >> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes >> 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' > Yep, worked great! Fixed all of

On 10/12/2017 3:17 AM, mj wrote: > Hi all, James, > > After following James' suggestions fixing the several dbcheck errors, > and having observed things for a few days, I'd like to update this > issue, and hope for some new input again. :-) > > Summary: three DCs, all three running Version > 4.5.10-SerNet-Debian-16.wheezy, samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs reports

On 10/9/2017 1:28 PM, mj via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > We would appreciate some input here. Not sure where to look... > > We have three AD DCs, all running samba 4.5.10, and since a few days, > the samba DCs are getting stuck regularly, at ramdon times. Happens to > all three of them, randomly, and currently it is happening up to a few > times per day..! Must be some

On Thu, March 12, 2015 11:49, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > Ok, yeah I can understand that. I'll correct it. Still need a way to > get SSL enabled however. Any suggestions there? The method we use is to create an application specific directory under /etc/pki and place its certificates and keys in there. This is how several packages from RHEL/EPEL do things: drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Mar

On Sat, May 9, 2020 09:37, Rowland penny wrote: > >> > Are you using the same filesystem on both machines ? > No, DC1 uses UFS as that was the only file system which would support provisioning on FreeBSD in 2016, when it was set up. I am trying to get the domain moved to new DCs running Samba-4.10.15 on FreeBSD with zfs as the underlying store. I never thought to consider the

On Mon, May 11, 2020 15:27, Rowland penny wrote: > >> > If you want my advice (for what it is worth), try jumping OS, Use the > latest Debian (or Devuan) with ext4 for the filesystem, this is > guaranteed to work. Using FreeBSD as a Samba AD DC has always been a > problem because of the filesystem. Not an option here. > > You may be able to get it working on ZFS, but I

Following the wiki replication guide precisely I got to this step. [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# rsync -XAavz --delete-after smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca:/var/db/samba4/sysvol/ /var/db/samba4/sysvol/ receiving file list ... done ./ brockley.harte-lyne.ca/ . . . brockley.harte-lyne.ca/scripts/ sent 142 bytes received 1,683 bytes 3,650.00 bytes/sec total size is 182 speedup is 0.10 [root at

I changed the entries in smb4.conf (smb.conf) to this: [global] . . . dns update command = /usr/local/sbin/samba_dnsupdate nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -d -g And this is what results when I run: samba_dnsupdate --verbose -d8 --all-names . . . update(nsupdate): SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.ForestDnsZones.brockley.harte-lyne.ca