similar to: Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails weirdly in SMBv2 mode

Le 13/10/2017 à 01:46, Jeremy Allison via samba a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to >> mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in >> principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough >> for

This might be a kernel thing. 4.13.5-1 .. ? Archlinux? There where recently e-mail about this on technical. So maybe its not implemented parts in samba or mount commands (yet) And i point to this : smb2_get_dfs_refer > > >> [13424.783242] CIFS VFS: ioctl error in smb2_get_dfs_refer rc=-2 > > >> [13424.789504] CIFS VFS: cifs_read_super: get root inode failed To give

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to > mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in > principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough > for the Windows clients. But it fails for me with some errors which > I do not

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Hadrien Grasland via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 15:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Share mounts in SMBv1 mode, but fails > weirdly in SMBv2 mode > > Hi Louis, > > Thanks for your reply! > > > This might be a

Thank you! Is this information available programmatically through some LLVM API, so that next time some hardware manufacturer does some crazy experiment, my code can be automatically compatible with it as soon as LLVM is? Le 11/03/2017 à 13:38, Bruce Hoult a écrit : > PowerPC G5 (970) and all recent IBM Power have 128 byte cache lines. I > believe Itanium is also 128. > > Intel

I guess that in this case, what I would like to know is a reasonable upper bound of the cache line size on the target architecture. Something that I can align my data structures on at compile time so as to minimize the odds of false sharing. Think std::hardware_destructive_interference_size in C++17. Le 11/03/2017 à 13:16, Bruce Hoult a écrit : > There's no way to know, until you run

Hi everyone, I'm hailing from the Rust community, where there is a discussion about adding facilities for aligning data on an L1 cache line boundary. One example of situation where this is useful is when building thread synchronization primitives, where avoiding false sharing can be a critical concern. Now, when it comes to implementation, I have this gut feeling that we probably do not

Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more (it doesn't have the last attribute set to true). This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac

Would wine permit me to run Google Earth? I note it's only available for Windows at present... I might try it anyway but if anyone already has and it doesn't work, it would save me the effort. -- Phil Reynolds o ____ mail: phil@tinsleyviaduct.com |L_ \ / Web: http://www.tinsleyviaduct.com/phil/ (_)- \/ Waltham 67, Emley Moor 69, Droitwich 79, Windows 95

Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more. This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac and libao doc. And here's what metaflac --list

Hi Sonic, > Was looking into how to disable SMBv1 and NetBIOS on a Samba AD. > > I suspect that if one just wants to support Win7 and "greater" this > should work. However to prevent some open NetBIOS ports the "nbt" > service must be removed from the "server services" entry. you can add the two lines to smb.conf to disable netbios support [global]

Hello. I'm using Archlinux Mate with its testing repositories activated. I am only the owner of an ISP "box" with an embedded HDD working only with SMBv1 protocol. After I updated my archlinux box to Samba 4.12.0, I noticed that my access was rejected. I tweaked my /etc/samba/smb.conf to add this in [global] section. "server min protocol = CORE client min protocol =

On 05/04/2020 12:08, fredbezies via samba wrote: [access blocked on old smbv1 only hardware] >> >> I tweaked my /etc/samba/smb.conf to add this in [global] section. >> >> "server min protocol = CORE >> client min protocol = CORE" >> >Try doing a similar thing, but replace 'min' with 'max' and 'CORE' with >'NT1',

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Arnab Roy via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 8 juni 2017 14:23 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] ntlm_auth and SMBv2/v3 > > Hi , > > I just need some clarification ; > > We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on > Freeradius, will

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 15:30 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > hai, >   > Please keep it mailing to the list, this way is shows up of others also. > A workaround for disabling SMBv1, you can make your server less secure but thats not what i would do. > > Setting these to enable NTLM v1 again. > > lanman auth = yes NEVER set this. > ntlm auth = yes This

Christian Garling via samba wrote: > Take care that smbclient, cifs-utils and keyutils is installed. Also > have these lines in /etc/request-key.conf: > > create cifs.spnego * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k > create dns_resolver * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k > > My setup satisfies these requirements. I have tried the connection

Hi Aurélien, is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working? Regards, Christian Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> a few days ago we

Hi , I just need some clarification ; We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on Freeradius, will disabling SMBv1 break authentication for ntlm_auth + Freeradius ? Many Thanks Arnab

Was looking into how to disable SMBv1 and NetBIOS on a Samba AD. I suspect that if one just wants to support Win7 and "greater" this should work. However to prevent some open NetBIOS ports the "nbt" service must be removed from the "server services" entry. Basically these two entries (note nbt missing in the services line): server services = s3fs, rpc, wrepl, ldap,

Hello Andrew, Do you plan to release the patch for "ntlm auth = mschapv2-only" option soon ? We need this on order to use freeradius in a "more safe" scenario than with "ntlm auth = yes" Best Regard, Lulzim KELMENI Direction des Systèmes d'Information Mairie de Saint-Ouen Le 08/06/2017 21:36, Andrew Bartlett via samba a écrit : > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at