similar to: Samba 4.6.2 member server errors

Hai, I'll explain a bit. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: me at tdiehl.org [mailto:me at tdiehl.org] > Verzonden: donderdag 12 oktober 2017 19:15 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.6.2 member server errors > > Hi Louis, > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > >

Hai, You googled with the wrong words i think. 1 search, 6 words. 4e link and 5e link, for explanation and solution. ;-) Based on your question, what i experianced and what i found with google. https://support.oneidentity.com/authentication-services/kb/92515 Dont look at the product here, but its an exact match on the error code. They say, source of the problem is AD out of sync. And

Hi Rowland, On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:38:13 -0400 (EDT) > me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Yes I understand, however, there are 2 things I am concerned about. >> >> When the errors are spewing, winbind never goes to sleep and the load >> on the server runs somewhere between 6-8 constantly (as shown by >>

Hi Tom, Small update. I'am also still looking into this but im not getting much futher.. I am just reading : https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2009/12/31/verifying-the-server-signature-in-kerberos-privilege-account-certificate/ Bit older but, im trying to understand more what happens here. And the only "guess" i can make here is . A kerberos ticket, with

On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 05:33:31 -0400 (EDT) > me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:45:43 +0200 >>> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hai, >>>>

On 12/04/2017 02:15 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Possibly, if, by using the old config, Samba is ignoring the 'idmap > config DOMAIN' lines and putting everything into the '*' domain, then > you may (probably would) have more than your original set up allowed. > If this fixes it, you have found another bug ;-) > It should work with the old lines. I now

Am 2017-12-04 um 18:07 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > On 12/04/2017 02:15 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> Possibly, if, by using the old config, Samba is ignoring the 'idmap >> config DOMAIN' lines and putting everything into the '*' domain, then >> you may (probably would) have more than your original set up allowed. >> If this

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:40:44 -0400 (EDT) me at tdiehl.org wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:38:13 -0400 (EDT) > > me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > > >> Yes I understand, however, there are 2 things I am concerned about. > >> > >> When the errors are spewing, winbind

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:40:44 -0400 (EDT) > me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Hi Rowland, >> >> >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:38:13 -0400 (EDT) >>> me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>> >>>> Yes I understand, however, there are

Hello List We run a Solaris9 Server running Samba 3.0.20, Local Users (no winbind) but authenticating against ADS. There are up to 800 concurrent users, mostly Windows XP SP3. When clients access MyDocuments, which is redirected to the Samba share, we observe several "Session Setup AndX Request"s followed by "Session Setup AndX Response, Error:

Hello, We are experiencing ADS lower performance on Samba-3.0.22 for HPUX. I did Google search, and find out one message posted at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-November/114231.html at the earlier time. >From my observation, it seems there was a spin on reply_spnego_negotiate()/ reply_spnego_kerberos() calls that invokes register_vuid() to register uvid with different vuid# for a

Hello everyone, Samba stopped authenticating AD users after minor upgrade. Environment: - OS: CentOS 7 - Samba Version: Upgraded from samba-4.10.16-15 to samba-4.10.16-25 Problem: Clients are unable to authenticate with Active Directory credentials, receiving a "password incorrect" error. Verification: sudo net ads testjoin shows a successful join. wbinfo --ping-dc confirms

Hello, First of all : Happy New Year to you all :-) I need your help for a problem. I've 2 servers on CentOS 7: a Samba DC+AD and a Samba Files Sharing. In the Samba file sharing server, all data is store in a RAID Disk partition wich is mounted in /data/ (fstab : UUID=a47ea879-7072-4e8f-a668-3f5a86e58ef2 /data ext4 defaults,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1?? ?1 2). Under Windows each user has

Hi everyone, A quick question: Is check password script option working for ad dc setup? I believe, ad on it's own cannot provide password protection against dictionaries.

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 03:34:08PM +0200, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote: > No need to be sorry - most likely I'll the whole setup from scratch. Did so (I am following a script by now, so it does not take too long), but I feel more and more lost - there must be always something different I do wrong: Now I configured DNS the other way round, pointing every host to the DC and using

So, we have Samba file sharing working on CentOS 7.6 with sssd: [root at cns-srv-lnode2 samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) [root at cns-srv-lnode2 samba]# smbd --version Version 4.8.3 Some smb.conf configuration details: - security = user - an idmap entry is unnecessary - disable netbios = yes works fine - pretty sure nmbd is unnecessary

Hello, We're having a problem with "Samba 4" joined to a "Server 2008 R2" domain (at "Server 2008" functional level across the forest). The interesting thing is that this only affects a single user - all other accounts work without problems. When accessing our main server using that account, "smbd" always reports "can't parse the PAC:

I would like to bump my question 2015-05-27 10:21 GMT+03:00 Krutskikh Ivan <stein.hak at gmail.com>: > Hmm, looks like it's not. I've just set the password for something that > cracklib-check would argue using both ad management tools and at windows > login. Should it work that way or I'm missing something? > > My dc's smb.conf: > > [global] >

Le 05/01/2020 ? 14:27, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 05/01/2020 11:36, Ni Co wrote: >> Hello Rowloand, >> >> ok, I just keep "default" for the mounting. >> >> I changed the path of my share : >> >> [homes] >> comment = User Home Folder >> path = /home/%U >> read only = no >> follow symlinks = yes >> wide

On 24/06/2019 10:00, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:52:07AM +0200, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote: >> <http://froehlich.priv.at/www/samba/> > Always try your own links before posting them... it must be > <http://froehlich.priv.at/samba/> of course, sorry. > No problem, I just refreshed the old page I had open ;-) You have this on the