similar to: transfer hanging to older smb device

Dear All, Sorry to post it here as I don't see any better to post this question I've.... I've have a samba 4 files server (Member server of a AD DC) And also a synology diskstation. The AD DC is a Samba 4 AD DC and it have RFC2307 enable and configured. I would like to sync 2 folder so that they can have the same files contents and also controls. But the synology diskstation

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-06-15 01:04, Min Wai Chan wrote: > I agree, > If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it > would be easy... > However, it seem

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

Hi Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > Hi > > rsync -a should be able to perform chown using usernames rather than uids > so your files would still be owned by the right user. > > Regards > > Le 14/06/2015 16:48, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > >> Dear

I have a very peculiar issue. On my Synology NAS I have a bunch of LDAP users and SMB is configured by Synology to accept LDAP logins. So far so good. I log in through an LDAP user by specifying my "base dn" as the domain name, which is "ds" in my case, nice and short. I have 2 users. One user is present on my system with the same name, the other isn't. When I mount

Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid Why do you need bidir sync? Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > Hi Sebastien, > > Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? > > Thank you. > > S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > >> Hi >> >> rsync -a should be able to

Just a small question. ============== I was really just meaning to ask whether there are issues with running truecrypt inside a samba share. My system had never had any issues but now I was writing to a folder that is a truecrypt mount inside a samba share and the smbd process writing into it blocked or is still "D" waiting for IO and I cannot kill it. So the question was whether

Hi, I hope someone can help me with this. Problem Dovecot writes to _/var/lib/dovecot/instances_ 1 up to 3 times a day, causing the system to wake up and disks to spin up. Details content of /var/lib/dovecot/instances : 1549073010 dovecot /var/run/dovecot /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf --> only the timestamp is changed (to current time) when dovecot writes to this file --> during write the

I should describe the problem more in details, but I believe this is off topic for this list. The FolderA is named "Musica" (in Italian) because.. I like it that way.. and is in my home folder. PC # /home/gionata/Musica FolderB MUST be named "music", in my home folder on the NFS filesystem, NAS # /volume1/homes/gionata/music *because the synology media parse service only

Hi everyone, On a server running Debian 9, I have multiple KVM guests automatically started at boot by libvirtd.service and running in the background. When I shutdown this server, libvirtd.service automatically and gracefully shut them all down first. So, every thing is fine so far. Recently, I've added an additional KVM guest and this one does not respond to a shutdown command from virsh

Roger, I just ran a manual test, killing power and see what happens.  I set the Synology “Time before DiskStation goes into Safe mode” to 5 minutes so I didn’t have to wait like an hour until it powered down.  Here is the log: https://hastebin.com/ovuwilufeb.sql Everything appeared to be normal; the servers powered off and the Synology went into safe mode.  Power was then cut to the Synology

On 8/1/20 11:25 PM, Todd Benivegna wrote: > I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this… I have a Synology > NAS (DS416) that has a feature where you can enable a “Network UPS > Server” which is a NUT server.  I have been trying to get the Synology > to shut down three Ubuntu 20.04 servers that I have. While it does > work when I test it out manually, sometimes when

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

How would I capture with Wireshark when it seemingly happens at random?  Whenever I test, everything appears to work normally.  I wish I could somehow replicate it.  Maybe I need to test manually and see if it’ll happen in front of me; I’ve never actually seen it happen… always happens when I’m away. -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 2, 2020, 12:12 PM -0400, Manuel Wolfshant

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Robbie van der Walle wrote: > Out of curiosity, when you shut down the NAS, do you run the > command "upsdrvctl shutdown" ? ?Do you see or hear anything to > suggest that the delayed UPS shutdown has happened? > > I don?t know where to search to answer this. The delayed UPS shutdown > means that Synology NAS will turn off the UPS

[please use reply-all to include the list.] > On Oct 12, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Daniel Green <ddgreen at gmail.com> wrote: > > I recently connected my UPS to my NAS. The NAS detected the UPS, and I checked the "Enable network UPS server" option and added relevant IPs to the "Permitted DiskStation devices" option. The NAS is running DSM 5.2-5592 Update 4, with a NUT

Jeremy Allison schreef op 12-07-2016 0:58: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: >> I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent >> or received to the server. >> >> Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. >> >> Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified >> mount.cifs. >> >> When I send

Jeremy Allison schreef op 01-07-2016 19:53: >> So the transition from regular filespace to LUKS filespaces >> (different volume) is not getting this LUKS filespace to appear >> empty to Samba, but not to the linux system itself. Is this to be >> expected? >> >> Is that normal operation, this? > > Hard to tell without logs I'm afraid. We'd need

> Yes, See the User Manual http://networkupstools.org/docs/user-manual.pdf chapter 6.3 "Configuring automatic shutdowns for low battery events?. > The NUT documentation is not always clear, and it looks as if the Synology is even less clear. You must distinguish carefully between "system shutdown" and "(delayed) UPS shutdown". The UPS is turned off _after_ the