similar to: samba 4 ad member - idmap = ad for machine accounts

Hello, Thanks for quick reply. File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. [global]        netbios name = VS-FILES        security = ADS        workgroup = MYDOMAIN        realm = MYDOMAIN.COM        log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log

Hello, I think I'm not explaining the issue correctly and I'm being misunderstood. I'll give an example: windows 7 machine PC1$ is running AD GPO startup script that forces it to read some files from network share hosted on the centos server with samba 4. The script will be run as windows SYSTEM user (that's the default behaviour of autostart scripts). But since SYSTEM is a

Thank everyone for input, It seems that using RID is the way to go. I just tried a few things: 1) - made group, assigned unix GID - added test PC to this group and set this group as "primary group" - added manually to test PC account "uidnumber" on server with samba getent passwd MYDOMAIN\\testpc$ returns nicely testpc$ with UID and GID numbers as set in

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:14:45 +0200 Kacper Wirski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I have samba 4.5.10 file server as AD member (AD is also samba > 4.5.10). > > I'm using unix extension for windows rsat to set UIDs for all users > and on samba AD member i'd prefer to use idmap = ad to have > consistent file permissions across multiple

Hi Rowland, >> File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all >> with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't >> necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. ... > 'SYSTEM' is a Windows group and is meaningless to Unix, it should be > mapped to a Unix ID only on a Samba AD DC and there it is an >

Basically that was my initial question, should adding GID and UID to domain computers group (gid) and machine accounts (uid) be enough, and if it should, and it doesnt work - what else should be done to make it work, or what am I missong? I'm not sure what You mean about invalidating cache? Wysłano z mojego smartfona w PLAY <div>-------- Oryginalna wiadomość

Hello, Since I updated recently my samba DC's, I've noticed some werid behaviour on windows stations (seems random?) with some GPO's not being applied from time to time (reboot or even logoff-login usually does the trick). When policy is not applied and I run "gpupdate" on windows client  I'm getting output, that policy xxx (Default domain policy) could not be

I posted already, but here it is again (it's everythign except it has not 1 but ~10 SOMESHARE, all with exact same config) Full entry from smb.conf: [global]        netbios name = VS-FILES        security = ADS        workgroup = MYDOMAIN        realm = MYDOMAIN.COM        log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log        log level = 1        idmap config *:backend = tdb        idmap

Hi, I have a problem with GPO editing. I have some GPO first created with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 7 x64. I have modified recently this object with RSAT and GPO editor on Win 10 x64 . If I try to edit the GPO back to Win7 I got the following error (in french): La ressource ? $(string.SiteDiscoveryEnableWMI) ? r?f?renc?e dans l?attribut displayName est introuvable. Fichier

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:55 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > It is not the SYSTEM user (that is a local user to the > > > workstation, so clearly does not exist on the domain). > > Yes it does. Look at "Builtin\system" which is also "NT

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:37:37 +0200 Kacper Wirski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for quick reply. > > File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all > with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't > necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. > > [global] >       

Hello, I have couple of samba 4.5.10 AD DC running that I've been planning to upgrade to 4.7.latest I"ve done upgrades previously (from 4.3), so I know the procedure, but I've been checking on samba list regularly, and I see some people having issues after update, mainly with replication. So how safe is it now? Are there still known issues? Should i upgrade 4.5 -> 4.6 -> 4.7 or

Trying to use the idmap config ad on a domain member. The AD is an actual Windows server and when logged in the AD server running ADUC the NIS domain field on the UNIX attributes tab only shows a dash and is cannot be changed. Domain member is RHEL 7.6 running Samba 4.8.3. Pertinent part of smb.conf: ===================================== [global] security = ADS workgroup =

Hi LPH, > Drawbacks for RID, yes, multiple, but maybe it does not apply for you. > > Read the Advantages and Disadvantages > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid > > My reason for NOT using RID on FILESERVER setups. > Only one : File ownership of domain users and groups are lost, when the local ID mapping

On 28.01.2019 15:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:10:58 -0500 > Sonic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Trying to use the idmap config ad on a domain member. The AD is an >> actual Windows server and when logged in the AD server running ADUC >> the NIS domain field on the UNIX attributes tab only shows a dash and >>

> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:42:39 +0000 > Rob Mason <rob at acasta.co.uk<mailto:rob at acasta.co.uk>>> wrote: > >> Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ >> I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and >> undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with >>

Hello, Centos 7.5 samba 4.8.3 installation, compiled from source working as AD DC. It was an update from 4.7 (not an in place update, but added new DC's to existing domain and demoted 4.7.x DC's). After adding to my smb.conf: /apply group policies = yes/ I see errors on samba star: ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:327(samba_runcmd_io_handler)   /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_gpoupdate: SID

Hello, I've been setting up new file server using samba 4.8.3 (centos 7 RPM), as samba 4 AD member server using my earlier smb.conf when I realised that I was  previously somewhat circumventing the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege by using "admin users map" to SAMDOM\Domain admins" parameter in smb.conf. I decided to change my smb.conf and setup shares following samba wiki. All

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 19:49:32 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:28:05 +0100 > Kacper Wirski <kacper.wirski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm going to start with clean centos install, so I might as well use > > some additional guidelines, thank You. > > > > When You run kinit, does Your user have

Hello! After process, error continue...... ---------------------------------------------------------------- C: \ Users \ USER1XXX> gpupdate / force Updating Policy ... Unable to update user policy successfully. The following errors for found: Group Policy was not processed. Windows was unable to apply the settings registry-based policy for the LDAP Group Policy object LDAP://CN