similar to: Samba shows error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND when copying 10GB file using robocopy when ecryptfs file system shared using samba

I shared raid 5 array which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01 -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba server,

Hi, I've been investigating the StructurizeCFG pass, and it looks like it has trouble handling CFG edges that break out of a loop and go directly to the function exit. Am I running up against a bug in the structurizer, or a general limitation of the algorithm used? As an aside, is there any documentation for the algorithm used? Is it based on a published paper? The input IR I have is the

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

Hi, I am new to RSpec and BDD. I was wondering if RSpec specifications are a good solution for testing REST webservices (not implemented in Rails). If so, what would be a good way to test something like the API described below? =========== GET http://localhost/workflow text/xml Result: 200 OK <?xml version="1.0"?> <workflows>

Hi, I am new to RSpec and BDD. I was wondering if RSpec specifications are a good solution for testing REST webservices (not implemented in Rails). If so, what would be a good way to test something like the API described below? =========== GET http://localhost/workflow text/xml Result: 200 OK <?xml version="1.0"?> <workflows>

On 10/31/2015 08:24 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r > 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs > ecryptfs 85424 0 > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]#

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 685ff985b7e4c55879b31822f4b81bd2 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 652450acf1c7922023e7da04bc86a590 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0cb2b6619882f6492b3c0190eace5bb4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 7a9e58b26bc1e9bb944ba131db28cad9 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm c0b39223824b2154eaefe4d9b0409672 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 880c55fb91b5da7be83571f90ed995c0 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 1dc8b59dfdfa7961103e3b91c780ea42 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: aa9dfe1c4fb367d7a43d76ed3c680ea4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm af16fc4c26f57cc3328bf7b5233cdba8 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm 381f3f7cedff81129f3a1e5d22130774 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.i386.rpm

I am now investigating encrypting our IMAP user spool files. Does anyone have experience with handling encrypted data stores using either or both of the subject methods and would care tio share their observations? Which is the preferred method (I know: it depends, but on what?)? What administrative pain does each cause? Our IMAP host is a KVM guest so spinning up a duplicate and simply

Scenario: Use the ssh-keygen utility in openssh-1.2pre17 to generate a host key Kill and restart sshd Remove the old host key from ~/.ssh/known_hosts Connect to the host using ssh. I get this: homer.ka9q.ampr.org$ ssh 199.106.106.3 who The authenticity of host '199.106.106.3' can't be established. Key fingerprint is 1024 a0:8d:17:f0:fa:a9:9f:6f:b5:d0:1c:d6:02:92:bd:5e. Are you sure

Conversion would fail if it was necessary to install a package, and multiple architectures of that package were already installed. This was happening specifically with device-mapper on RHEL 5 conversions. Unfortunately the flat dependency list in the config file didn't really allow this to be fixed. The best that could be done is to specify both i386 and x86_64 dependencies, but would mean

Hi folks, I'm playing with this version of OpenSSL: openssl-SNAP-20100804 On x86 using clang I can build it and run all tests successfully. On x86-64 using clang r110287 I get the error message below during "make test". Not sure if anyone has time to look into this but I'm probably not the right person to start debugging it... Thanks, John Regehr

I've noticed a problem with the ssh-agent for OpenSSH. When I list the identities found in the agent, I'm given a warning that the keysize doesn't match. $ ./ssh-add -L Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual 1023, announced 1024 1023 35 61...63 sam at host The problem only exhibits itself with the OpenSSH version of ssh-add, but using the SSH version of

I've got a problem that I'm hoping the list can help with, otherwise ... Heres the problem, I've got OpenSSH 1.2.2p1 running on my Intel Linux box as the secure server. I can connect from another Intel Linux box using scp and it all seems to work fine. Another box tries to connect and it gets a warning about the host keysize not matching. I'm thinking this could be some byte

hi guys I have a lxc guest on Dell's R815(AMD Opterons) which I just moved to an ecryptfs mounted folder(using centosplus' kernel C7.5) Copying data to that folder seems to work just fine, but I as soon as I start the quest, the host gets shot in the head almost immediately, hard reboot, no dump. I also have another, virtually identical guest but on Intel platform and that one does

hi guys I have a lxc guest on Dell's R815(AMD Opterons) which I just moved to an ecryptfs mounted folder(using centosplus' kernel) Copying data to that folder seems to work just fine, but I as soon as I start the quest the host gets shot in the head, hard reboot, no dump. I also have another, virtually identical guest but on Intel platform and that one does not do anything but runs