similar to: SMB data transfer performance on AD mode

Hi Rowland The 4.5.10 was the newest of 4.5x series on that time, but the 4.5x series is still supported isn't it ? What shares are configured unproperly or like old samba way ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 3:50:56 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] SMB

Hi Everyone ! I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go over 20 MB/s , transfering data using other protocols like FTP , rsync , rsync over ssh on any of these machines i can easily achieve 80 MB/s ,i also can get the same on

Hello everyone, Someone can explain me please how netlogon scripts work on Samba running on active directory mode ? Is the "logon script " parameter still working ? I'm trying setup some scripts but still have no success .

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

Hello Marc I already tried the first option the nt 4.0 way, but pointing the script to a network path (UNC path) instead of physical path , is it possible ? Best Regards Dante F.B. Col? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Muehlfeld" <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:10:35 PM Subject: Re:

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:17:56 -0300 (BRT) Dante Colo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > > Is there anyway to restrict a user to logon on domain or connect to a > Samba AD server only from some specific client machines ? > > Regards > Dante > > Read in 'man smb.conf' about 'hosts deny' and 'hosts allow' Rowland

Hello James I read this article, it's not working on Windows clients. ----- Original Message ----- From: lingpanda101 at gmail.com To: samba at lists.samba.org Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 2:05:09 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 ad client not syncing time On 8/1/2016 12:56 PM, Dante F. B. Colò wrote: > Hello folks > > I've deployed Samba 4.0.26 using Sernet binary packages

Hi people, I'm testing Samba 4.0.17 running as classic pdc mode under FreeBSD 10 and 9.2 , all shares are on ZFS volumes, i would like to use UFS instead of ZFS , but according the wiki page https://wiki.freebsd.org/NFSv4_ACLs nfsv4 inheritance flags works only with ZFS , i tried the parameters inherit acls and inherit permissions with module vfs_zfsacl on the UFS shares but got no success

Hi, I have an issue on a Samba 4.5 running as AD DC compiled from source installed on a CentOS 7.3 server upgraded from 4.3 which had the same problem ,file transfers of a single file between Samba and windows machines don't go over 13 MB/s while a transfer over ssh( scp or sftp) and rsync goes over 80 and 100 MB/s respectively, network hardware switches and machines ethernet cards are all

Hello everyone I trying find what it happens on my Samba AD servers especially with shared spreadsheets, my personal opinion this feature on Excel is crap and unreliable but many people use it, how does Samba currently behave with this ? Is someone experienced any problem with this ? Frequently happens changes made by other user are lost the spreadsheet opens as read only , the shares are all

Hi Rowland. The command (samba-tool user enable 'user') is used to enable a user account that has been disabled in AD, but it is not functional to unlock a user account that has been locked by wrong password. Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo MCP | MTA | MCDST | MCTS | MCSA | MS | MOS | ITIL-F | ISFS | CLOUDF | CI-SCS | VCA-DCV | 2016-08-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at

Hello Is there anyway to restrict IP or client machines that a specific user can connect to a share or restrict share access per IP/client ?

Your problem probably comes from using the AD DC as a file server. The file server should be separated, as recommended by the Samba Wiki. I get close to wire speed on dedicated member servers. With version 4.4.2, changes in behaviour for the "server signing" and "client signing" parameters were introduced to address the Badlock bug. Please read the following, specifically the

Hi all, A - I thought badlock mitigation was about encrypting SMB traffic, at least most part of it. And this encryption of most part of data transfer could (or should) lower performances. It seems I was wrong: smallest part (something like commands) are encrypted but not SMB traffic (ie file transfer). This for SMB protocol prior to SMB3 (which comes with windows 8). B - According to what I

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 09:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:52:29PM -0300, Dante Colo via samba wrote: > > Hi Everyone ! > > > > I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go

Greetings everyone !!! Maybe is a dumb question, but i couldn't find anything about it on samba wiki and no topics on mailing list since i was subscribed, is it possible audit files and folder user operation on active directory mode the same way is done with vfs_full_audit on old pdc style mode ? Regards Dante F. B. Colo

On 08. aug. 2018 22:30, Dante Colo wrote: > > If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . > I am already have 'vfs objects = zfsacl' set for my ZFS shares so acl_xattr does not help at all.

Hi Rowland Thank you for your reply, i removed them but nothing changed :(, i also tried to remove others thing like the full_audit module to keep the settings simplest as possible but had no effect, i'll try to build samba with profiling support and debug with some tools like gdb which i don't have much experience but i'll try it. The current Samba versions support the

>> A - I thought badlock mitigation was about encrypting SMB traffic, at least most part of it. >> And this encryption of most part of data transfer could (or should) lower performances. >> It seems I was wrong: smallest part (something like commands) are encrypted but not SMB traffic (ie file transfer). >> This for SMB protocol prior to SMB3 (which comes with windows 8).

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:52:29PM -0300, Dante Colo via samba wrote: > Hi Everyone ! > > I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go over 20 MB/s , transfering data using other protocols like FTP , rsync , rsync over ssh