Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "SOLVED: BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND"
2017 Sep 07
1
SOLVED: BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
> You may get away with using the 'rid' backend, but this will have to
be> your choice, but whatever you choose, I am sure we can help you get
to> a working domain.>
> RowlandSo I have an example. We have file and print server based on
CentOS 7 with Samba 4.4.4. As wiki said
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Automatic_Printer_Driver_Downloads_for_Windows_Clients)
2017 Sep 05
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Thank you very much for clarifying the ID mapping "magic";)
> You do not need 'posixgroup', it is an auxiliary objectclass of
group, you can add any of the rfc2307 attributes without it.
Well, is there any option to remove it? Because "posixgroup" is on
every group that was migrated from Samba 3.
And I cannot edit this attribute in ADUC (delete button is grayed).
2017 Sep 06
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
I do think its a classic upgrade from 3.x to 4.x that causes this.
And the samba 3 was a samba with smbldap-tools
or configured with something like : net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadm rid=512 type=d
( as shown here https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html )
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba
2017 Sep 06
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Ah, so you did find a bug in the classic upgrade :-) great, one less in the future samba ;-)
One extra to remember.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> Rowland Penny via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 6 september 2017 16:40
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]
2017 Sep 05
1
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Well, we are getting somewere...;)
>It is probably 'greyed' out because no Windows tools use it or will
add it. You will probably need to use Unix tools (ldb or ldap) to
remove>them, but you can if you so wish ignore them. What you should
never do is to rely on them being there, because they may or may not be
there.Ok, I'll let it be there> You need to remove the gidNumber
2017 Sep 06
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
>When you provision a new domain, it is set 3000000, but, seemingly,
when you run the classicupgrade it gets sets to a lower number (never
actually run a classicupgrade) based on what is in your old domain.
> Not sure what to suggest here, do you feel up to sending me (offlist)
a copy of your idmap.ldb ?
>
>Rowland
Thank you again, Rowland, for your time.
I think that different ID
2017 Sep 05
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Rowland,
Are (one) these not an option for him to correct this?
--allocate-uid Get a new UID out of idmap
--allocate-gid Get a new GID out of idmap
--set-uid-mapping=UID,SID Create or modify uid to sid mapping in idmap
--set-gid-mapping=GID,SID Create or modify gid
2017 Sep 05
1
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
To Rowland:
> This was perfectly common, nobody thought this would ever be a
problem,mainly because you had to have a user or group in /etc/passwd>
or /etc/group mapped to a Samba. Now with AD, you do not need a user or
group in /etc/passwd or /etc/group, so any user or group that uses the
RID as a Unix ID is> probably too low and is denying the use of any
local Unix users
Yes, but where
2017 Sep 04
2
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Hello everyone.
I'm trying to fix sysvol rights, because i see errors in output of
/usr/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception
- ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
/var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.svmetal.cz/Policies/{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2017 Sep 06
1
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
> I feel this all has something to do with the classicupgrade, the command works for me, does 'wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544"' work ?Yes. Take a look:wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544"
15538wbinfo --gid-info=15538
BUILTIN\administrators:x:15538:
> I haven't received it yet, but will examine and comment on it when I do.I sent it to <rpenny at
2017 Sep 06
1
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 11:24:17 +0200>Jiří Černý via samba <samba at
lists.samba.org
( https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba) > wrote:>>> I feel
this all has something to do with the classicupgrade, the>> command
works for me, does 'wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544"'>> work ?>> Yes.
Take a look:wbinfo
2017 Sep 07
0
SOLVED: BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Yes, that's exactly what I've done.Ok, my group has name "IT admins",
but logic is same;)Thank you.
However I have one more problem.
If I create new group or user and give it UID/GID, this is immediately
reachable on linux server. id user, or getent group/passwd and also
wbinfo -u/-g/-i can list info about it.
But if I assign group to user (or deassign), it spends a lot of time
2017 Sep 06
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:24:08 +0200
Jiří Černý via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Thank you again, Rowland, for your time.
> I think that different ID ranges in my domain is ok, at lest we will
> survive it, Is it desired behavior, as I assume, that getent group
> cannot list Domain Admins (and other groups) without setting UNIX GID.
> GPO processing is now ok, at
2017 Sep 05
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Thank you both, Rowland and Louis.
I'll try to answer you both and give you more info about our domain.
Generally:
In the past, we have Samba 3.5 NT4 domain on SLES server (designed ages
before, never upgraded). In 2015 I finally decided to migrate to Samba 4
AD. In those day it was 4.2. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck was ok, no
errors. AD worked (and working) as expected.
This summer, I
2017 Sep 05
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Hai,
I leave the advice about the uid/gid numbering to Rowland, i can not give a good advice on that.
The script was made in such a way that it should not matter what uid/gids are where used.
The script looks them up for you, but it must be error free so we are sure what is set is correct.
If you look in the script, you see the four SID.
DC_SERVER_OPERATORS="S-1-5-32-549"
2016 Oct 26
3
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a
freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a
standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the
client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server
unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC
itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are
2016 Oct 27
4
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400
Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve,
> except for 300000. Below is an example.
>
> root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/
> total 16
> drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies
> drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp
2016 Oct 26
0
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve,
except for 300000. Below is an example.
root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/
total 16
drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies
drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 scripts
root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/Policies
total 16
drwxrws---+ 5 MEDARTS\reachfp
2016 Oct 27
0
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
Wait, now I'm confused. Idmap lines do not need to be set up on the DCs? Then how does
windows figure's out the ids in the Unix Attributes tab? I thought you needed both
rfc2307 and idmap on the DC and the members.
Em 27/10/2016 05:39, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400
> Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
2016 Dec 09
2
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:56 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> From: "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:56 +0100
> Reply-To: "Stefan G. Weichinger"