similar to: Issues with mounting Samba shares after update

Actually it isn't part of AD at all. We are using FreeIPA and Samba. We just finally figured this out with the help of some folks at Red Hat. It turned out there was a bug in one of the libraries that came along with sssd (sssd-libwbclient I believe). Their suggestion to use winbind and the version of the same library that came with it seems to have solved our problem instantly. It

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:17:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Only change I made before installing Samba, was to comment the > '127.0.1.1' line in /etc/hosts Tried again with your smb.conf and minimal changes, and it gets worse: [2017/02/20 14:42:19.048133, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > OK, but getent and id return with error (id: no such user, getent: > return code 2). On the systems I've previously set up similarly > (Wheezy/Samba 3.6), id and getent work. > Is this before or after you tried my proposed smb.conf ? > > > > > > I've found

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:10:36 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > idmap config *:backend = tdb > idmap config *:range = 2000-9999 > idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid > idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999 > You mean TESTAD instead of SAMDOM, don't you? --

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:31:16 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:03:33 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 > > Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, but getent and id return with

Hi everyone, I have the exact same problem as this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772154 But the Samba version is different and much newer (Debian Wheezy 2:4.1.17+dfsg-1~bpo70+1). B asically many errors appear about non existing usershares. These fake usershares are just the user name, but truncated of the last character. process_usershare_file: stat of

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:51:42 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Thank you for reporting this back. Very welkom and good to heard you > fixed it. > > > It would be interesting to know which parameters absolutely > > kill performance this way! > > Yes, that would be great to know which parameters

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >

Hi everyone, we plan on setting up a Samba 4.x based AD. We have a couple of ancient to old systems running samba 3.0.24 to 3.5.7 and 3.6.24. Is there any problem to integrate those old systems as member of a Samba 4-driven AD? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique

I've got a Debian/Jessie Samba 4.2.14 running as an AD member. ADC is a Windows2008R2 server. Join worked without problem. # net ads testjoin Join is OK wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work perfectly and provides a list of users and groups from the AD as expected. wbinfo -i <user> works too: # wbinfo -i TESTAD\\testuser

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:50:52 +0100 Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:20:52 +0100 > Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > I've added > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * : range = 10000-30000 > > to smb.conf, and now 'wbinfo -i

Le Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:46:12 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > 4.2.x is EOL as far as Samba is concerned, there have been a lot of > changes since 4.2.* came out. > > Can I suggest you go here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > > You can get a much more recent version there, 4.6.7 OK I'll try it, but that doesn't really explain why

Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > These are your non-default lines: > > > > server signing = mandatory > > and i bet that one has the major performance impact > __________________________ > > quote from microsoft: >

Hai, Ok, so you have 3 the same machines and only one is slow. Thats important info. Did anything special happen with this server. For example 2 servers got a new install and this one had an upgrade (or sort of upgrade) from the "old" server? Or you configured the new server in an other (ad site) and moved it to the new location. In tring to figure out, where what happend, so we

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:28:08 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I HATE these auto send keys.. Did i tell that already.. > ( see below ) > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: L.P.H. van Belle [mailto:belle at bazuin.nl] > > Verzonden: woensdag 16 augustus 2017 23:22 > > Aan: 'samba at

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 09:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:52:29PM -0300, Dante Colo via samba wrote: > > Hi Everyone ! > > > > I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:23:34 +0200 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:12:27 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:51:42 +0200 > > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hai, > > > >

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:13:39 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > Both, alas. I'll retry by entering everything as you proposed instead > of editing the existing file. Please do, it should work > Here: >

Le Fri, 25 May 2018 16:55:04 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > > I don't understand either (or find in the documentation) how to > > disable these usershares. Any help and explanation appreciated. > > > > If you must use such an old EOL version of Samba, try what it says in > that Debian bugreport. A better

Hi, we have network performance issues with Samba (Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6) on one of our servers. The maximum throughput from client to server is 110 MB/s (read/write) under Windows 7 x64 (single 10GE NIC). When using NFS on a different Linux workstation we're getting much higher rates, around 500-700 MB/s. I still can't find the problem. Setup server: CentOS 6.6 Samba 4.7.2