similar to: extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:21:53 +0200 Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > here's my problem: I have a fast server (dual Xeon E5-2620, 64 GB RAM) > with a fast RAID array (24 disks, RAID-6, more than 2GB/s read/write > local performance, XFS filesystem) and fast network : dual 10GigE > (myri10g) and 40GigE (i40e). >

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:28:08 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I HATE these auto send keys.. Did i tell that already.. > ( see below ) > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: L.P.H. van Belle [mailto:belle at bazuin.nl] > > Verzonden: woensdag 16 augustus 2017 23:22 > > Aan: 'samba at

Am 2015-09-17 09:29, schrieb Pasi K?rkk?inen: > > Are you using nfs over UDP or TCP ? > TCP, but Network cant be the bottleneck, have tested it with iperf between bare metal/domU's and the nfs domU and it was perfectly fast... > > I don't think. > > > If you used NFS over UDP, try running it over TCP. no I use it over TCP... > > What does

Op 29-01-15 om 00:00 schreef Gordon Messmer: > On 01/28/2015 12:12 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> >> ARPING 192.168.1.15 from 0.0.0.0 br0 >> Unicast reply from 192.168.1.15 [AC:16:2D:72:67:D4] 0.723ms >> Sent 1 probes (1 broadcast(s)) >> Received 1 response(s) >> >> Thanks anyway > > I'm not sure what you mean by "thanks anyway".

Op 29-01-15 om 21:21 schreef Gordon Messmer: > > I haven't seen delays anywhere near that long before, even with heavy swapping. But I guess I'd look at that sort of thing first. > > Run "iostat -x 2" and see if your disks are being fully utilized during the pauses. Run "top" and see if there's anything useful there. Check swap use with

For some reason, Rsync did not copy two specific file. Then I tried to specifically tell it to synchronize one of them and I get this result. *I* don't see any reason why to chose not to copy this file, but maybe on of you out there would see the obvious reason I am missing. dprweb> /usr/local/bin/rsync -vvv --stats -Pzrtpl --delete --password-file=/export/home/webuser/.appprod

Hi, I'm in trouble with a share, I found that the problem comes from the "force user" parameter in my smb.conf. This is my smb.conf : [global] netbios name = filserv workgroup = SAMDOM security = ADS realm = SAMDOM.FR encrypt passwords = yes log level = 8 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range =

If you look at http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html then you see that all program test have '*' in run time columns. I think problem in using plain 'time' command in RunSafely.sh At FreeBSD 'time <program> <args>' call generate output in format " 0,00 real 0,00 user 0,00 sys" for *.time files instead expected

This node rebooted due to a kernel panic and we are not able to mount the ocfs2 filesystems after that. Please help [root at guard0 ~]# /etc/init.d/o2cb online Loading module "configfs": OK Mounting configfs filesystem at /sys/kernel/config: OK Loading module "ocfs2_nodemanager": OK Loading module "ocfs2_dlm": OK Loading module "ocfs2_dlmfs": OK Mounting

Hai.   Config. Debian Stretch, samba 4.7.7. member server AD backend. Network setup like in the howtos here. : https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/tree/master/howtos      Today i discovered that somehow a disabled user was able to login after a few retries.   I run a SSH/SFTP server for data exchange with the customer of the company here.   The SSH/SFTP server is restricted by groups, this

Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at> schrieb am 13.09.15 um 22:08:04 Uhr: > > I think the query-string f?r MySQL would overwrite this mail_location, > > right? But how do I define it in the query? > > yes thats how it should work but your query (looking at the query result > from your first email) overwrites the mail_location with >

Hi, I have a samba server setup as a domain member. I am trying to grant SeDiskOperatorPrivilege to some user accounts e.g. "domainaname\User", but I always get the above error. It doesnot matter what I specify as the server in -S option to the command. The command syntax I use is: net rpc rights grant "username" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege OR net -S ADserver -U

Le 21/11/2019 ? 15:15, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 21/11/2019 14:00, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >>> Not entirely sure, but why does 'Administrator' own something on a >>> Unix machine, it should be 'root'. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> Even with root as owner or chmod777 on target directory result in the

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > account instead? > The whole idea behind the user map on a Unix domain member is to map the Domain Administrator account (RID 500)

On 13/02/2023 10:54, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows >> admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's >> ???? > > seems so > > I don't know if he would take that one DC down if

On 27 January 2016 at 20:27, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/01/16 01:03, Henry McLaughlin wrote: > >> On 27 January 2016 at 08:24, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: >> >> On 26/01/16 20:54, Henry McLaughlin wrote: >>> >>> [root at centos7member ~]# net rpc rights list accounts >>>>

Hey Rowland, Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. Thanks for your help, Greg On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Hi, Our local school has a 100 % CentOS network on servers and desktops. Until recently, we were using a highly customized Xfce desktop environment. Last week I decided to migrate all desktops from Xfce to GNOME, which went quite well. Now I have to sand down some rough edges. The secretary complained that she can't use the numeric keypad as before. She's using LibreOffice Calc a lot,

Administrator is a built in account in the AD. When you provisioned the domain with a password , that was Administrators password. LP On 29 Oct 2023 at 21:36 +0100, Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux > user called Administrator but then where will the credentials