Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Incompatibility Windows 7"
2016 Dec 06
0
Cannot map to other client shares
That is really weird.
I think what is happening is that if you log in immediately you are
using cached credentials. If you wait a little bit then your network
connections are up and you are truly doing network authentication. If
you were do unplug from the network, reboot, login with cached
credentials, and then reconnect network cable I would suspect your
access to shares would be OK.
I
2016 May 31
0
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
On 05/31/16 11:09, pisymbol . wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
> <gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is the netapp a member of the domain?
> Yes.
>
>> My assumption is that you can have domain members that are patched with domain controllers that are not.
> I don't know what you mean by that. This worked before the samba CVE
>
2016 Dec 05
2
Cannot map to other client shares
Suggested changes applied to smb.conf (and yes, server role is classic PDC):
server max protocol = NT1
client signing = auto
client ipc signing = auto
server signing = auto
With no apparent change to the behaviour or resolution to the problem(s).
I'm particularly mystified by the logging-in behaviour (that is, if I manage to do it quickly I can log in, but if I
2016 Jun 20
0
problem with domain and samba3x
On 06/20/16 15:19, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote:
>> On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1
>>> server
>>> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site.
>>> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a
2016 Jun 20
3
problem with domain and samba3x
On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote:
>> Hi all
>> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1
>> server
>> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site.
>> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would
>> normally do I checked for Centos
2017 Feb 08
0
转发: 答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
Thanks for your response, Rowland.
Sorry for the late reply.
Here is my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = grouptest1
server string = %h server (Samba NAS)
dns proxy = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 10000
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
server role = standalone server
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync =
2016 May 31
2
Regression: The 'net' command is now failing to login (UNKNOWN ENUM VALUE 1003?)
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
<gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the netapp a member of the domain?
Yes.
> My assumption is that you can have domain members that are patched with domain controllers that are not.
I don't know what you mean by that. This worked before the samba CVE
changes took effect in the latest samba3 RPMs distributed by the
CentOS
2016 Dec 19
1
wbinfo -u does not listed trusted users, wbinfo -n works, idmap not working
On both Samba 4.5.1 member server and Samba 3.6.25 member server I tried
the following command
wbinfo –set-uid-mapping=35049,S-1-5-21-xx-xx-xxx-xxx
this should have created a mapping entry consistent with the one on the
domain controller for a trusted user
But I got the following error
failed to call wbcSetUidMapping: WBC_ERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED
As far as I can tell from network
2016 Jun 08
1
Solaris 10 Configure failure
ORACLE have released this patch for Solaris 10 - Samba v3.6.25:
IDR152387-03 addressing CVE-2016-2118 (BADLOCK) and other CVEs for S10 SPARC
Which has addressed our issue.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Gaiseric Vandal
Sent: 07 June 2016 14:51
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Solaris 10 Configure failure
2016 Dec 14
0
wbinfo -u does not listed trusted users, wbinfo -n works, idmap not working
On a samba 4.5.1 domain controllers (PDC and BDC), classic domain ,
LDAP is used as the backend for both user accounts AND for the idmapping
of trusted domains . Partial smb.conf below
workgroup = THISDOMAIN
security = user
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
idmap config * : backend = tdb
idmap config * : range = 5000-6000
idmap config THISDOMAIN :
2020 Aug 25
2
accessing foreign AD users to NT domain
Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 24/08/20 alle 17:39:
> [...]
> As far as I am aware, SMBv1 is still readily available on Win7, but from
> Samba 4.11.0, it is now disabled on Samba, so if you must use SMBv1, you
> will need to set:
>
> client min protocol = NT1
>
> server min protocol = NT1
>
> in smb.conf
ok, the samba server I'm using as test has
2015 Jan 08
0
Mandatory Server Signing with Windows 7
The wiki page settings control a netlogon security setting. I guess
the "server signing" parameter applies to all the other traffic. But
my guess - and it is only a guess- is that requiring server signing is
causing the netlogon process to break since it does not support signing.
The e-mail chain you reference does not make it clear if the samba
instance is a domain
2020 Aug 25
0
accessing foreign AD users to NT domain
On 25/08/2020 08:28, Piviul via samba wrote:
> Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 24/08/20 alle 17:39:
>> [...]
>> As far as I am aware, SMBv1 is still readily available on Win7, but
>> from Samba 4.11.0, it is now disabled on Samba, so if you must use
>> SMBv1, you will need to set:
>>
>> client min protocol = NT1
>>
>> server min protocol =
2018 Apr 30
1
4.2.14 (or newer) support "Windows for Workgroups 3.1a"?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Gaiseric Vandal via samba wrote:
Hello Gaiseric.
> I suspect at this point making Windows 7 and Windows 3.11 interact is a
> loosing proposition. It is pretty scary to think that there is still
> equipment that requires Windows 3.11. Hopefully it is air-gapped and not
> part of the electrical grid.
I can evaluate different options: I
2017 Jan 22
4
答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
Thanks for your reply, Louis
However, I am still blocked by this problem now. !-_-
I tried to set the samba server as the DNS server and visit the shared folder by input "\\aaa.bb.com" at windows 7 client. In some cases it works and will not fail.
However the similar abnormal phenomenon also occasionally happens (especially at changing the authentication, such as local to ldap):
1) I can
2024 Jul 03
2
Request for a Lockdown option
Manon,
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 05:00, Manon Goo <manon.goo at dg-i.net> wrote:
> My Idea would be to have a shared secret option that the client and server would have to proof to know when initiating the Handshake. The Server or client could terminate the connection immediately when the peer does not know the secret. So in case of a security Problem the administrator could set an
2004 Jul 26
0
Password Syncronization with Mapped users
I'm not sure if this is supported or not, but I can't get it to work.
I'm trying to get the smb password and the unix password to sync for
mapped users. I have have 'unix password sync' turned on and I have the
username mapping file set up. When I change a users password in windows
(where the username is the same in windows and linux) the password
changes just fine. When I
2016 Apr 16
1
Badlock bad luck
>* Am 13.04.2016 um 07:51 schrieb Mogens Kjaer <mk at lemo.dk <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>>:
*> >* Hello,
*> >* I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows
users with samba running as an NT-like PDC.
*> >* After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.),
nobody can log in.
*> >* They all get the
2000 Feb 29
0
Smab Installation
Hi,
I have installed samba on one of my Unix server( SUN) and I am trying to access the share directory from a NT workstation. Earlier If I had used a guest account and I was able to connect to the share created on the Unix server. Now I want to access with users / groups through NT domain server which I received the following error :
The account is not authorized to login from this
2004 Nov 10
0
Initial install - networking problem
Hi,
I'm just installing Samba for the first time and have a problem with
name resolution on my test client. Samba 3.0.8 is installed on
a RHES system named 'fileserver1 (.our.xxx.edu)'. The clients
are Windows 2000 and XP systems. This is a subnet that is part of
a larger campus network. There is no Domain, just a workgroup
called 'our_adm'. I have a very simple smb.conf
file