similar to: Public file share Samba 4.6.5

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:50:42 -0500 John Schmerold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am trying to configure a public file share on \\fs1\vol1 > > From a Windows 7 command prompt, I enter: dir \\fs1\vol1 > Windows says: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. > > Where am I going wrong? > > Error log says: " SPNEGO login failed:

Mine has been working well, but the only problem is that it doesn't support callerid (from the POTS side). > -----Original Message----- > From: John Schmerold [mailto:john@katy.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:37 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zhone Zplex 10 units > > Thanks for the Zplex heads up. > > Steven

For a CryptoLocker infection to be successful, a few things must be occur including: 1) No backup 2) Many files need to be encrypted Has anyone developed a Samba plugin to prevent successful CryptoLocker infections by shutting down Samba when an unusual number of data files are modified by a specific workstation? This type of utility would have many security applications, for example

This is normal. Samba spawns 1 smbd plus 1 for each connected client. If it concerns you that these hang around you can set the deadtime parameter in smb.conf to limit the time they remain live. The default is deadtime=0 which means no automatic termination of unused connections. Set this to the number of minutes to wait before disconnecting an idle connection. I use deadtime=10 on a server

I have our Samba server mostly working, however it will not allow me to change the password on the client desktop or via USRMGR. The error message we are getting is "the system cannot change your password now because the domain TOPC is not available". USRMGR reports "Could no find domain controller for this domain" Everything is authenticating properly. Any ideas? I'm

Most of my users (unfortunately me included) need to use a bloated, badly designed piece of sh^Hoftware that only works with administrator's rights (I won't say names but it's from a big german company strongly pushing for software patents). How can I assign those users Administrator's rights without phisically going to each machine? I cold put them in the 'Domain

We are not much off. But you have mixed "samba/window" and "windows/windows" settings. Samba/windows \\%logonserver%\home\%username%\desktop Windows/windows \\hostname.fqdn.tld\users\%username%\desktop Guess, which one i use. ;-) Now, do get where this is coming from. So use this (add CNAME for you member server ), Note, you MUST setup PTR records.

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

# uname -a Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # rpm -qa|grep zfs zfs-test-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-devel-0.5.2-1 # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool1 120K 228G 21K /pool1 pool1/fs1 21K 228G 21K /vik [root at

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > A setup on howto improve your samba network and simplify it. > This is how i setup, sure looks dificult but its all about DNS setup and > what you add to it. > > For AD-DC.s ( AD, TIME, NS, LDAP ) > Hostname.FQDN.TLD : max 63chars, incl the .'s allowed chars: a-Z 0-9

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

I'm running Samba v4.4.4 as a domain member server in security=domain mode. Our 3 domain controllers are Server 2012r2. Every 3-4 days, I see log messages from winbind saying "winbind_samlogon_retry_loop: sam_logon returned ACCESS_DENIED". Sometimes this corresponds to a trust password change, but not always. Today, new connections to Samba were failing with the error

Hi, I have a cluster of 10 servers all running Fedora 24 along with Gluster 3.8. I'm planning on doing rolling upgrades to Fedora 27 with Gluster 3.12. I saw the documentation and did some testing but I would like to run my plan through some (more?) educated minds. The current setup is: Volume Name: vol0 Distributed-Replicate Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6 Bricks: Brick1:

>From FS1 (file server): #> cat /etc/hostname fs1.webb.local #> cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4 ::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6 192.168.5.161 fs1.webb.local fs1 #> cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager search webb.local nameserver 192.168.5.160 #> host -t A