similar to: "Create-only" Samba share

Moved from Richard's blog to here.... A couple of people have requested removing the dependency on zfs-fuse from the ubuntu packages that Richard released last week, and there is some confusion about the state of ZFS in Ubuntu. There are 2 Linux compatible implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse (http://gitweb.zfs-fuse.net/) and ZFS on Linux (http://zfsonlinux.org/). ZFS-fuse is in the official

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:19:58AM +0100, Tim Fletcher wrote: > Moved from Richard's blog to here.... > > A couple of people have requested removing the dependency on > zfs-fuse from the ubuntu packages that Richard released last week, > and there is some confusion about the state of ZFS in Ubuntu. > > There are 2 Linux compatible implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse >

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:19:58AM +0100, Tim Fletcher wrote: > > Moved from Richard's blog to here.... > > > > A couple of people have requested removing the dependency on > > zfs-fuse from the ubuntu packages that Richard released last week, > > and there is some confusion about the state

Am 3/16/20 um 3:04 PM schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Am 3/16/20 um 2:59 PM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 16/03/2020 13:50, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> Is this the machine that you cannot set the permissions on ? >>> Yes. >>> >>>> If so, what is the filesystem ? >>> Ext4 for SO and Ext4 for

I am using zfs on linux to store my file shares on. When I create a new file system, they have the following permissions: [root at server ~]# zfs create tank/testsystem [root at server ~]# ls -Al /tank drwxrwxrwx+ 10 root root 27 Jun 2 20:10 Software drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Jun 3 07:43 testsystem At this point, if I use the rsat and attempt to set ACL, I get permission

HI all, Having fixed the group issues from solaris having a default max of 16 groups I can now locally create and delete files on the solaris box as a domain user However when accessed via samba I can not create new files/folders (although I can delete the files I created when logged on locally) I have created a temporary directory on a non zfs (non acl enabled) file system to see if that

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:51:58AM -0700, Chuck Munro wrote: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? > > Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few > more stable

Hello, I'm running a PDC and a secondary DC in privilegded lxc containers and try to setup a fileserver in an unprivileged lxc container. The shares of the file server are on the ZFS of the host and mapped via bind-mount. I've got the problem, that I get error messages when setting the ACLs of a samba share either via the Windows explorer or using the smbcacls command. On Windows

On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Blake Hudson <blake at ispn.net> wrote: > > I've never used ZFS, as its Linux support has been historically poor. When was the last time you checked? The ZFS-on-Linux (ZoL) code has been stable for years. In recent months, the BSDs have rebased their offerings from Illumos to ZoL. The macOS port, called O3X, is also mostly based on ZoL. That leaves

Hi, I am having a really strange problem with my Samba shares on Debian Buster. None of the users can access any shares, which reside on ZFS-filesystem. Any other share works just fine. For example, if I create a normal folder to /home with same permissions and replace a ZFS-share with that, it works fine. When accessing any ZFS-shares the following error is recorded: Jan 08 22:39:56

Benjamin Smith wrote: > On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:25:00 AM PDT Andrew Holway wrote: > >>> Btw, right now, we've just built a new server as Ubuntu, because my >>> manager wants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act >>> as a RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the >>> whole thing natively. >> >>

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

Re: zfs... The odd thing is... It's not mdadm that's acting up, at least not in my opinion, as I have had two other domain member servers at other locations that host shares on filesystems that are raid arrays built with mdadm. The only difference between those boxes and this one is the LSI MegaRaid controller. Now I'm no expert when it comes to this controller, the box shipped with

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:06:37PM +0200, John Doe via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a really strange problem with my Samba shares on Debian > Buster. None of the users can access any shares, which reside on > ZFS-filesystem. Any other share works just fine. For example, if I > create a normal folder to /home with same permissions and replace a > ZFS-share with that, it

On Tue, May 12, 2020 09:46, Rowland penny wrote: > One problem is that ZFS uses NFSv4ACLS and a Samba AD doesn't, it > expects POSIX ACLS, there also is a possibility that xattr may be > another problem. > > Try reading this: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12912 > I have worked with Timur on this very problem in the past. And he has produced in

On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:25:00 AM PDT Andrew Holway wrote: > > Btw, right now, we've just built a new server as Ubuntu, because my > > manager wants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act as a > > RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the whole thing > > natively. > > ZFS on linux was originally an EL project. Ubuntu

On 2014-09-15 , kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: > > So the ZoL folks want one more feature before calling it 1.0; otherwise > they believe it's production ready. Only your own testing can convince > you that it's truly production ready. > > --keith > That's encouraging news, something I've been looking forward to. FWIW, I've been running ZoL

I added one testshare /home/testijako and connected to it with the same credentials as I would connect to ZFS-shares. Then I did the strace to that particular PID and tried connecting to one ZFS-share. There was indeed an error which might have something to do with this issue: Line 2001: lstat("/tank/rex", 0x7fff1f6fb2c0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Im sure that folder

On 26/10/2019 22:51, tootifrooti via samba wrote: >> Is there any way to still use systemd to manage smbd or do I have to >> just always start it manually? > Did you ever find a solution to this problem? I'm experiencing a very > similar problem right now. When running samba via systemd any access to a > share on a zfs filesystem results in the `make_connection_snum: >

On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:49:25 -0400 Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > From the top down, I'm going to try and cover every step involved in > the wiki and give you as much info as I can in the hope that we can > get this issue resolved, or at least determine that there is nothing > wrong with my config and that the underlying