similar to: Invalid parameter error

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:17:42 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:27:13 -0500 > Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork: > > https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from > > around the time period of

I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork: https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from around the time period of the bug report. It looks like quite a lot of work in ./python/samba/provision/ On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:23:28 -0500 > Andrew Walker via samba

Hi, Anyone knows what is this? [root at artemis bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [DOM.CITY10.COM.BR]: Domain [DOM]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [187.85.85.1]: Administrator password: Retype

But if Samba AD does not work on the ZFS filesystem, then why bundle it with the NAS4Free OS? What filesystems does the Samba AD support? On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Andrew Walker via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes. I imagine that's why Andrew Bartlett commented: "There may be some > good news in the future, as I've had one of the developers at

Ok so how can I setup the SAMBA AD on the ZFS? I ma using this tutorial guide to do what I need it to do. Now, I do have the samba service being installed o a UFS formatted ZFS Volume. I know that without that, it won't work right. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:23:24 -0400 > phillip mobley via

Hello, I have a problem with samba provisioning as DC. CentOS 7, built from tarball using samba howto. Below is the output. I would have filled bug report, but the "New Account" in bugzilla is not working also :( [root at dc samba-4.6.0]# samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --realm navidom.office.navi.pl --domain NAVIDOM --server-role dc --adminpass DuDu778$$# --dns-backend

I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and samba-4.3.6. But if I provision domain by command samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes I got error: Fixing provision GUIDs ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - pytalloc_reference_ex() called for

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:23:24 -0400 phillip mobley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am looking to setup a Samba AD on my NAS. I am currently using the > latest version of NAS4Free which has Samba bundled into it already. > > However, I am getting a very nasty error when I go in to setup the > samba service: > > Initializing... >

I am trying to setup samba as a dc using bind dlz I'm not sure how much I need to setup on bind before I can use it. I did the following check. [root at dc1 ~]# named -V | sed 's/ /\n/g'| grep '\-\-' |grep -e gssapi -e dlopen '--with-dlopen=yes' '--with-gssapi=yes' I am using the default config for samba that came with Fedora Rawhide. I wanted to try out the

I'm trying to configure an SoC system as an AD DC on Ubuntu 18.04. I was successful on Ubuntu 16.04 a couple of years ago, and the script I used to configure the system from first boot to provisioned fails on 18.04 and 16.04. The failure is thus: Setting up self join set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741637,

Hi, I just tried Samba-4.6.0rc4 on FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 to see if there's still a problem with "net rpc" commands but it crashed already at provision: # samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [RW.LAN]: Domain [RW]: erver Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS

Bind-9.11 is installed. How do you configure it? Does it need anything special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf file that I should be able to include in my /etc/named.conf afterwards? My guess is that some directory is missing. But if I start fresh and configure samba with the internal dns it gets all the way through it's configuration with no errors. I've

Yes. I imagine that's why Andrew Bartlett commented: "There may be some good news in the future, as I've had one of the developers at iXSystems working with me on a proper fix, specifically for zfs. It might take a little while however." As things stand, I believe that domains provision correctly within the context of FreeNAS itself (i.e. through the webui). Hence, the comment

Am 18.07.2018 um 14:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:49:39 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hmm, your REALM is 'SMBDOMAIN.FILE.DUCK' but your dnsdomain appears to > be just 'duck' > > Rowland > I read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ - but I am not sure that my

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > See inline comments > And Please keep replies to the list > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:26 -0600 > Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Samba's wiki didn't have a walk through working example from A to Z. > > It is great don't get me wrong but I

Hi all, I try to install a samba4 AD DC, but when I try: samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive I have this: Realm [DOMAINTEST.LAN]: Domain [DOMAINTEST]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [127.0.1.1]:

Hello, I found the cause. It was the default kerberos config on CentOS: /etc/krb5.conf Please add to the wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller that before provisioning we should remove this file. It wasn't confusing only for me, as the resolution I found was in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11573

I had the same problem this week. Resolved commenting on the line "includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/" in /etc/krb5.conf On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Vinicius Lehmann via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone knows what is this? > > [root at artemis bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 > --interactive > Realm

Ok tomas. For a good removal of all samba packages. 1) for x in `dpkg -l | grep samba` ; do apt-get remove --purge $x ; done 2) apt-get remove --purge winbind That should clear all packages of samba. When thats done. Try the install again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Thomas Massip [mailto:thomas.massip at e-tera.com] > Verzonden: woensdag 27

Hi, I'm practising to do a classicupgrade of my samba3 domain. When I run the upgrade, I get this error : unpack_nt_owners: owner sid mapped to uid 0 idmapping sid_to_xid failed for id[0]=S-1-5-32-544: NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED unpack_nt_owners: unable to validate group sid. set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741734,