similar to: samba-tool SIGSEGV

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

Hi, I'm having trouble with the classic upgrade. We have three samba servers: Server1: CentOS 5/Samba 3.6 (with smbldap-tools) Server2: CentOS 6/Samba Version 4.2.14-SerNet-RedHat-23.el6 Server3: CentOS 7/Samba Version 4.2.14-SerNet-RedHat-23.el7 Server 1: CentOS 5/Samba 3.6 (with smbldap-tools) Serves our OpenLDAP backend for centralised authentication (LDAP replicated to two other servers

On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 10:53 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > \ > > > > Next rid = 13001 > > > > krb5_init_context failed (Invalid

On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> \ >> Next rid = 13001 >> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >> # >> >> Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken >> for

On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >> Anyone? > Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? > > Hi, I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only 266KB. Is the list server or SPAM filter blocking my previous message? In attempt to

On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Anyone? >> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? >> >> > Hi, > > I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only >

On 15/02/17 14:40, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 13/02/17 10:18, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 >>>> Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>>

Anyone? My next concern is codepages. The latest source (I've moved to 4.5.5 now) doesn't have any >> codepages. The RPM spec file I'm customising lists and wants to install them here: >> >> /usr/share/samba/codepages >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/lowcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/upcase.dat >> /usr/share/samba/codepages/valid.dat >>

On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Hi, >>> \ >>> Next rid = 13001 >>> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >>> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >>> # >>>

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 > > Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > I've grabbed samba 4.5.4 and customised an existing rpm spec > > > file. > > > Still some issues there. > >

On 09/02/17 11:14, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 10:53 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >> On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> \ >>>>> Next

Hi, I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High Availability servers, automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down. My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've found appears to not do this. Am I missing something? My configuration so fare includes: * SAN Storage Volumes for raw device mappings for guest vms

Hi, I've been looking for an answer to this question and can't find anything concrete that says full support for write barriers has been backported to the stock kernel. I've read that: "There is incomplete write barrier support in kernel versions 2.6.32 and earlier (2.6.31 has some support, while 2.6.33 works for all types of device target) - RHEL 6 uses 2.6.32." Now, I

Hi , I'm trying to migrate an old server with ubuntu 9.10 ,samba3 +ldap to a new server ubunut 14.04. I could follow the steps of https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_domain_to_a_Samba_AD_domain_%28classic_upgrade%29 but when running samba-domain tool classicupgrade --dbdir = / util / tdb --use-xattrs = yes --realm = gruporesasco.local --dns-backend = BIND9_DLZ

Hi, I've done a classic upgrade to from samba 3.6.23 to samba 4.6.5 bringing across all the user accounts. The samba 3.6.23 we set up with smbldap as an NT Domain with OpenLDAP. After a lot of effort the classic upgrade worked well but now I'm a bit stuck with idmapping. The new AD DC is running 4.6.5 on CentOS7 and I can connect using ADUC. I set up a separate AD DM on a another CentOS7

CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) Hi, Last night our CentOS 7 server rebooted. Seemingly it's a very clean reboot. I can't find a shred of evidence as to why it happened though. Things I've checked: * sa reports * /var/log/{messages,secure,dmesg,cron} * /var/log/audit/audit.log * lastlog The host is used for KVM virtualisation and connects via multipathing to our OmniOS SAN via

Hi ! I hope this is the correct place to ask questions ... I'm having the following problem : A "service" on an NT 4 server cannot connect to a samba share on my linux machine. The specific versions are given below. From the NT machine I have no problem as the administrator to login to samba server and view the target share. The supplier's service however cannot

On 10/07/17 17:05, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:17:42 +1000 > Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've done a classic upgrade to from samba 3.6.23 to samba 4.6.5 >> bringing across all the user accounts. The samba 3.6.23 we set up >> with smbldap as an NT Domain with OpenLDAP. After a

This is a bit off topic, however it's related to a samba based network... I've got a small network (10 users) running samba on a Linux box with a HP network printer. This is working so well, that the only network problems that I have are with printers other printers "shared" by Win 95. Therefore: I was planning to turn an old 486 with an 80M HDD into a print server, however the

Hi, I get this error when trying to insmod the ipp2p kernel module: "insmod: error inserting ''ipt_ipp2p.ko'': -1 Invalid module format" in the kernel log: "ipt_ipp2p: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" Kernel version 2.6.20.4 iptables version: 1.3.5 ipp2p version: 0.8.2 (latest) Anyone tried ipp2p with kernel 2.6.20? Best Regards Niclas