similar to: Bidirectional Osync question

I just setup replication of sysvol between my two DC's using the "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround" and all went well with two exception. First, it seems that since an upgrade to Openssh version 7.0 that "dsa" key use is disabled by default by the Openssh team. There has been some questions for some time now regarding the security of

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being used for this replication anymore. As the instructions there actually use "Osync" then the word "UNISON" should probably need to be replaced with "OSYNC". (I looked

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

On 2016-08-26 10:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication >> workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON >> when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being

Hello all, Just to ask have anyone try osync before? https://github.com/deajan/osync And would you think that this will fix our issue on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Where DC2 files or folder will be removed? Thank You.

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:19:17 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I understand, but dont replication between sites, is my problem.... > > Regards; > Lets start by confirming if this is your setup: Matriz site Filail DC1 --------------- DC3 | | | | DC2

On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:37:28 -0300 Carlos <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > Matriz site Filial site > DC1 -------(OPENVPN)-------- DC3 > | > | > DC2 > > DC1 -> DC2 = OK > DC1 -> DC3 = OK > > DC2 -> DC1 = OK > DC2 -> DC3 = NO > > DC3 -> DC1 = OK > DC3 -> DC2 =

On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:40:36 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just setup replication of sysvol between my two DC's using the > "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround" and > all went well with two exception. > > First, it seems that since an upgrade to Openssh version 7.0 that >

Hi! i have 3 dcs with samba i demote bdc and replace it with dc2 with de same ip the replicate with dc1 is ok, and the replicate of dc3 with dc1 is ok, the problem is in dc2 with dc3 i found the problem, but i dont known how fixes when i do samba-tools drs showrepl in dc3 i see in connection appears the old dc named bdc and dont appears the new, dc2 i try with samba-tool drs replicate but

On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:58:13 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: > > DC2 ->DC3 > > DC3 -> DC2 > > All OK, > > I tested with option > > kccsrv:samba_kcc=No > > is ok too. > > But in my DC2, a received one erro: > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2

Just some notes: For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster filesystem. I have no idea how far this is supported w/ samab (ACLs, ...) Maybe a old tool related to drbd might be worth some testing too: http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ Klaus ________________________________________ Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [samba-bounces at

Hi Rowland, Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I > have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original > page back to the unison way of doing things. > > I will also discuss the unison page with Louis Van Belle, I believe he > is still using this method and may have

2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > Dear Daniel, Klaus > > I've try that before > But because of how samba work on the files. > > The Advise is No > Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... > > > Maybe i'm wrong, but we are talking about the sysvol and the databases are out that folder. Sysvol only have the

I dont understand whats the question here. But what i can say about the resolv.conf settings if you have multiple dc's. You have to think in 2 DNS resolving settings. 1) on the server as client resolving ( resolv.conf ) 2) clients resolving ( DNS Services ) The difference explained. If i do : ping hostname this is a server which is doing a client dns request through resolve.conf

On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:01:48 -0300 Carlos <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > I dont have DC4... > But, i shutdown DC1(manutenção) > i created user in DC2, this user doesn't exist in DC3, never > replication... is not problem? > > Regards... > > On 17-05-2018 17:49, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:37:28 -0300 > > Carlos

Hi people I have a questions, i have 3 domain controllers, all with samba dc2 with dc1 drs is perfect dc3 with dc1 drs is perfect but dc2 with dc3 i have errors: WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED in CN=Configuration, DC =DomainDNsZonesm anda DC= ForestDnsZones have you any idea what can do? Sorry for my english, i am from Argentine.