similar to: RDNS records are not generated automatically.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "RDNS records are not generated automatically."

2005 Jun 10
1
ATTN: Keith - Seriously OT
On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith [SMTP:akohlsmith-asterisk@benshaw.com] wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote: > > Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com > > ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT > > > > Your MTA claimed it was called "SOURCE" but rDNS tells the recipient
2024 Jan 10
1
matchname: host name/name mismatch logging
After fixing the abnormal logging with attempts to chmod smbpasswd file, a new threat is now happening: [2024/01/10 16:29:13.984400, 0, pid=2853904] ../../source3/lib/util_sock.c:711(matchname) matchname: host name/name mismatch: 10.2.111.26 != (NULL) [2024/01/10 16:29:13.984471, 0, pid=2853904] ../../source3/lib/util_sock.c:893(get_remote_hostname) matchname failed on 10.2.111.26 Yes,
2024 Jan 10
1
matchname: host name/name mismatch logging
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:32:39 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > After fixing the abnormal logging with attempts to chmod smbpasswd > file, a new threat is now happening: > > [2024/01/10 16:29:13.984400, 0, pid=2853904] > ../../source3/lib/util_sock.c:711(matchname) matchname: host > name/name mismatch: 10.2.111.26 != (NULL) [2024/01/10
2010 Sep 15
1
Reverse DNS, Kerberos, and Samba4 as a DC
Hey everyone, I'm one of those crazy people willing to try setting up Samba4 alpha in a small production environment as a DC. I've followed the Samba4 HowTo (which is excellent by the way) and have a domain setup and functioning in a test environment. My production network, however, is not quite as nice as my test network. I have convinced IT (I work for a group of research
2010 Feb 18
3
R CMD check: OK in LINUX. Crashes in Windows!
Hi, I have followed the recommended steps for creating a package (rctest). As of now, my goal is simply to understand how various pieces fit together. The package includes: (1) C code with source in sub-directories, compiled to create a static library. (a) There is a single C-struct (dns) a simple 'matrix': {int m; int n; double *d;} (b) C code to create random matrix of a certain size.
2012 Feb 02
10
postfix - reject of incoming mail due to helo check??
Hi list, I have been getting the following types of log messages Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=<DWoodman at orangebankfl.com> to=<rkampen at ndgonline.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.floridianbank.com> a rdns check shows all is well
2024 Jan 10
1
matchname: host name/name mismatch logging
10.01.2024 17:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: ... > If this is a standalone server, then I suggest your turn on Avahi and > use it, that way rdns will work, you will get 'whatever_hostname.local' Heck. I'm saying that a feature foo is broken. You're suggesting to use another feature instead. The purpose of my email is to fix the broken feature, instead of switching to
2016 Oct 09
1
Another DNS problem
I just changed a DNS/rDNS record using samba-tool. According to samba-tool the change actually occurred. I can query the new record: > samba-tool dns query nikita.samdom.example.com samdom.example.com dc1 ALL Name=, Records=1, Children=0 A: 192.168.1.6 (flags=f0, serial=149, ttl=900) Similarly the rDNS shows: samba-tool dns query nikita.samdom.example.com 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
2014 Oct 02
3
slammed
I just got SLAMMED with accessed to httpd from 91.230.121.156 I added the address to my firewall to drop it. FYI host 91.230.121.156 156.121.230.91.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer no-rdns.offshorededicated.net. Jerry
2016 Jun 27
4
Looking for GSSAPI config [was: Looking for NTLM config example]
On 27.06.2016 07:31, Mark Foley wrote: > Thanks for the reply. When you say it [NTLM] "should" work, I understand you to be implying > you've not actually tried NTLM yourself, right? I've never gotten a response from someone > saying they have or are actually using it. Your subsequent messages about NTLM v[1|2] may be > the problem, but email clients I've tried
2015 Mar 06
2
Centos 6 - disabling IPv6 addressing
On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > >> IPV6INIT="no" >> >> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope). >> >> What else do I need to do to disable the listening for RA announcements >> >> and setting an IPv6 global address? I do not want to reboot the box. > There are other modules, most notably bonding
2009 May 29
1
Kerberos with delegated domain
Ok, here is the set-up. We have a domain that is the main domain, it handles DHCP and DNS for domain.edu. The DNS for domain.edu has NS records to delegate domain.local to our Active Directory. I am able to bind a machine just fine to the Active Directory without having to change any of the client DNS settings (which poing to domain.edu). File services work fine. I'm trying to work out single
2015 Mar 09
3
Centos 6 - disabling IPv6 addressing
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 03/06/2015 11:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> IPV6INIT="no" >>>> >>>> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope).
2015 Jun 18
3
wbinfo fails: Error looking up domain users
Thanks Rowland, I am trying to setup an AD member server. I followed the wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server). I am on Fedora 21. The domain join succeeded But wbinfo fails: $ wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users I tried to increase windbind log verbosity to 10, but I can see no trace when issuing wbinfo: /etc/smb.conf log level = winbind:10
2018 Feb 06
2
Inconsistent results while attempting to preset a computer with a one-time-password
On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 14:09:08 -0500 Dan Oriani via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I'm not opposed to the idea. Does 'net ads join' support supplying > the machine name as the user, and the one-time-password given to it? > The only reason I'm using adcli at all is the preset-computer option > which I couldn't find an analogue to in 'net
2016 Jan 27
6
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
On 27 January 2016 at 08:24, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/01/16 20:54, Henry McLaughlin wrote: > >> [root at centos7member ~]# net rpc rights list accounts >> -U'TESTING\administrator' >> Enter TESTING\administrator's password: >> Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1 >> Connection failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
2019 Jul 01
5
HPE ProLiant - support Linux Vendor Firmware Service ?
hi guys does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? many thanks, L.
2018 Jul 25
2
doveadm who reverse dns lookups
Perhaps this is a feature request... It would be nice if the ?doveadm who? command printed out the reverse dns name of where the user was logged in from. Would it be possible to either add some option to doveadm who for this, or make it the do it by default and add a ?-n? option (like many of the other programs that look up ip addresses by default) and take a -n option to not do that? Not
2023 Dec 19
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
I've moved my new DC from one location to another test location within the office where it will be deployed. The new test location connects to subnet 192.168.0.1 rather than 192.168.0 as I used when doing the initial setup. I've been going through the wiki verifying zones, rDNS, etc. On the A record test I get: # host -t A dc1.hprs.locl dc1.hprs.locl has address 192.168.0.2
2023 Dec 19
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:46:24 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I've moved my new DC from one location to another test location > within the office where it will be deployed. The new test location > connects to subnet 192.168.0.1 rather than 192.168.0 as I used when > doing the initial setup. > > I've been going through the wiki