similar to: apt.van-belle.nl offline?

Any version above 3.5 is unsafe..   Jessie 4.2.14 is patched. https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3860 https://packages.debian.org/jessie/samba    Stretch and 4.5.8-1 not yet, ( 4.5.8-2 wil be ) https://packages.debian.org/stretch/samba   Keep an eye on the list, i'll post when its my new ones are done.     Greetz,   Louis Van: Elias Pereira [mailto:empbilly at gmail.com] Verzonden:

Hai yes, This was for a short time, its up again. Its not updated yet, i removed the old package since these are unsafe. New are comming. Repo wil get 4.5.10 Manual update 4.6.4 So be patient, im guessing tomorrow, or tonight. Dependes the wife tonight ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >

Hello L.P.H van Belle Your apt are offline? I am getting error messages while updating my distro and when I access the https://apt.van-belle.nl/ the following message appears: "Site: Unknown This site you entered is not known by this server. or did you used an ipaddress to access this server ! Try again with a correct hostname" -- Elias Pereira

Did i already tell, i hate the "short cut" send button in the emails... So again.. The Stretch packages are being prepared as we speak, but i just got some orders to do other things first. When my office work is done today, i'll start with the stretch packages. I hope i make them today. Its on my list also, i cant upgrade my office, im myself also in the need of stretch 4.6.5

Hai Elias,   NET USE \\10.10.1.7\IPC$ /user:campus\administrator pa$$wd Works! :) C:\>net use Novas conexões serão lembradas. Status       Local     Remoto                    Rede -------------------------------------------------------------------------------              E:        \\vboxsrv\D_DRIVE         VirtualBox Shared Folders OK                     \\10.10.1.7\IPC$         

Hello, I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" option, but it also did not work. I read that in the user scope there are 2 installation options: - Deployed to User, Assigned Software - Not installed until the default is opened in the Programs Folder in the Start Menu. - Deploy

Am 2017-06-30 um 09:31 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Did i already tell, i hate the "short cut" send button in the emails... > > So again.. > > The Stretch packages are being prepared as we speak, but i just got some orders to do other things first. > When my office work is done today, i'll start with the stretch packages. I hope i make them today. >

Hello Denis, thanks for the answer!!! so for accessing a share on the file server, you'll need to add read rights > for "domain computers" group Is this read permission for the domain computer I need to configure in the deploy software GPO, sharing folder or both? psexec -i -s cmd > net use F: \\server\sharename > dir f: At first I was able to execute the

hi, Still dealing with the error. In some posts on the internet, a user reported that he has more than 40k objects in samba and that's why the error occurs. When running the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes" reports that it has "Checking 16529 objects (Checked 16529 objects (0 errors))". So it wouldn't be my case. Running "samba-tool drs

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Now, differences is fine, but can you see if one of the 2 servers is > correct, and for that it might be handy to share the output. > > You can push the good DB to the

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

Am 2017-07-07 um 18:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2017-07-07 um 14:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Good luck with the migration, if you follow what you did in your tests, >> you should be okay. Unfortunately I will be un-contactable for the >> next two days, but I am sure that you will get help if you require it. > > it looks quite ok, but

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

im on phone, had a quick small look at the dc3 output. is your time in sync, it looks like a 3 - 10 min different. gr. Louis Op 7 mei 2019, om 18:34, Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> schreef: Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5

No stupid question. For me there is not. Better to ask than to stay with the doubt. I believe that had not used this command, but now I have. But I am still with the error: "Error while trying to join domain" poa "Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password." About the results of the command "net groupmap list", you would have any tips on how I can solve this

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

hi, My saga continues... I've configured the audit log for drs_repl in smb.conf, and below is the log generated. https://transfer.sh/7fen4qCNIQ/drs_repl.log The log level was 5. drs_repl:5@/var/log/samba/drs_repl.log Could someone take a look and help me understand the log? On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:29?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi samba list!!! > >