similar to: browsing problem with minimum protocol SMB2

Hello, > On 07/10/15 00:33, TAKAHASHI Motonobu/高橋 基信 wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tested to transfer all 7 FSMOs from Windows Server 2003 Enterprise > > to Samba 4.3.0 DC. (I think some users still use Win2K3 and want to > > migrate.) But unfortunately is failed. > > > > To reproduce, > > > > (1) Promoto Win2K3R2 Enterprise host to first DC.

Hello, I tested to transfer all 7 FSMOs from Windows Server 2003 Enterprise to Samba 4.3.0 DC. (I think some users still use Win2K3 and want to migrate.) But unfortunately is failed. To reproduce, (1) Promoto Win2K3R2 Enterprise host to first DC. (2) Join self-built Samba 4.3.0 to the domain. (3) Run 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all' root at jessie64-1:~# samba-tool fsmo

I tried to user delete_if on an association: class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :memberships, :dependent => :destroy has_many :users, :through => :memberships ... end This is the controller method, trying to use delete_if. Although some elements are removed (s2 < s1), the save method does not update the association. def intersect_or_remove_group other_group =

Andreas, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the > samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the > scenario and the findings, I have two simple questions: > > 1) I plan to use a new, reproducible test scenario with 2000 random small > files with a file length

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

First off, I'm a little confused but I've been trying to do some research and still have some questions... (please forgive me!) I'm trying to figure out the "best" (ie. fastest) way to connect from Ubuntu to Windows Server 2008. I can use SMB, SMB2, or NFS.

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and a CentOS 7 machine. Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. - Copying to a smb share on a Mac seems to work, but is also much slower. - Using a normal Gigabit network

Hi, I have a Mandrake 8.2 server with samba 2.2.5 installed. My server has ftp and the files some users upload I move them to another structure, this structure is shared via Samba with other users. I am in a W2k Domain.(We are in the process to migrate to linux). So, I have some users that move the files uploaded to their servers. A few days ago, a user reported me he couldn?t see the files in

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi everyone, Steve and Jeremy gave a great talk at SambaXP on SMB3 with Posix extensions. The death of SMB1 gets nearer ! I was wondering what is the minimum Samba version and minimum Linux kernel version in order to get that support. Cheers, Denis -- Denis Cardon Tranquil IT 12 avenue Jules Verne (Bat. A) 44230 Saint S?bastien sur Loire (FRANCE) tel : +33 (0) 240 975 755

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

>> - smbclient [no -m option] is OK and slow (uses default SMB1/NT1?) >> - mount.cifs -o vers=1.0 is OK and slow >> - smbclient -m SMB2 (or -m SMB3) fails > The above is the interesting case, as this is much > easier to debug (in user space) than the kernel > client. > > Can you give more details on *exactly* HOW smbclient -mSMB3 > fails ? This is really

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

Hi Louis I'll try your configuration too.. Thanks.  RODRIGO YOSHIOKA Em Terça-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2016 8:37, L. P. H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> escreveu: For my home server i did it like this. Share \\server\backups [backups]     path = /media/sambashares/backups     read only = No by default everybody had full control on the share. Rights on the folder are 777

Hello, Thank you ! I add server min protocol = SMB2_02 to smb.cnf All clients are now using SMB2_10 as minimum protocol version May you indicate me the difference between "client min protocol" and "server min protocol" ? "server min protocol" is to use on a domain member "client min protocol" is to use in which case ? Should I also set client min

Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535]

Hi Samba Users, I'm in the process of building a Samba4 CTDB /GPFS Cluster joined as a member server to AD that also supports ACL's . It has taken some time but almost everything is working now :) . My one outstanding issue is editing files using Excel 2007 on Windows 7 results in a 'Document not saved' error. I believe this is an issue with the SMB2 protocol as I can edit the same

Hi Jeremy, Hi Steve, Hi Ronnie, thanks for your replies and the profound discussion. I think, it's best to demonstrate my problem case along an real world example: The following log of a console sesssion shows how I am doing the mounts on behalf Linux Kernel CIFS-FS Module on the client side against a Samba 4.5 file server (both running on Debian Stretch 9.8) via SMB/CIFS resp. SMB2 protocol: