similar to: Is FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO mandatory in samba-4.4 & onwards

Hi, I am using a samba server for file sharing in our companies IPv4 based LAN. The samba server is running as VM on a ubuntu 14.04 qemu/kvm host using ubuntu 14.04 as OS. I am using the lastet version available for samba: 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3 My Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 client are able to find the server and connect to the shares but the Windows 8.1 client of a colleague is not able to

On 29/12/15 18:26, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Performed and output were all like that, no list in the attribute > > # record 1 > dn: CN=001-PLAT-01,CN=Computers,DC=interno,DC=mydoainDC=com,DC=br > > # record 2 > dn: CN=001-COMPRAS-15,CN=Computers,DC=interno,DC=mydomain,DC=com,DC=br > > # record 3 > dn: >

I have just installed Xen by following http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Beginners_Guide All in all pretty good, however it mentions using the xl toolset but when I first installed only the xm toolset would work. This was great for creating linux based domains but it gave me an error about hvm when I tried creating a Windows domain. I then apt-get install xen-tools-common and edited /etc/default/xen

Hi, I have a new xen hosting platform. I have given the bridge a static IP which I can ping/ssh to etc, when I create a new vm all works well apart from the networking. If I give DomU a static IP I can''t ping out from the box, Dom0 can''t ping the vm. I''m suspecting it just isn''t seeing the bridge but am unsure where to start looking. This is a very standard

About your price of 1oo,oooo Prounds from N0KIA ATM PR0M0.Kindly provide Name* Address* Mobile number* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hello. I've just tested my system that runs dovecot 2.3.4.1 on debian buster with testssl.sh (https://testssl.sh/) and is says: Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation VULNERABLE (NOT ok), potential DoS threat Is this a configuration or a compilation issue and how to solve it? -- sergio.

When I put export DISPLAY="IP address:0.0" ip address being my windows8 desktop then xhost + I get xhost: unable to open display "IP:0.0" when I try export DISPLAY=":0.0" I get the same thing. I have centos6.4 running on a late model Dell Blade Windows8 Alienware laptop I checked the xwin firewall setting and it is set to public network access (but strangely

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Osiris <dovecot at flut.demon.nl> wrote: > On 09-03-16 13:14, djk wrote: >> On 09/03/16 10:44, Florent B wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see any SSL configuration option in Dovecot to disable >>> "Client-initiated secure renegotiation". >>> >>> It is advised to disable it as it can

On 09/03/16 10:44, Florent B wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see any SSL configuration option in Dovecot to disable > "Client-initiated secure renegotiation". > > It is advised to disable it as it can cause DDoS (CVE-2011-1473). > > Is it possible to have this possibility through an SSL option or other ? > > Thank you. > > Florent ssl_protocols = !SSLv3

Hello, I don't know who will read this message, but I found this thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dovecot at dovecot.org&q=subject:%22Dovecot+2.3.0+TLS%22&o=newest And I'm expected the same issue, I will try to explain to you (english is not my native language, sorry) Since Buster update, so Dovecot update too, I'm not able to connect to my mail server from my

Reply to Kiran Chandramohan: > You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to change the design as well as to contribute to the implementation. Thank you Kiran. > But the latest is what is there in the RFC in discourse. I have used this as reference for the response. > We did a study of a few constructs and clauses which was shared as mails to flang-dev and the

Hi, I have few questions / concerns regarding the design of OpenMP dialect in MLIR that is currently being implemented, mainly for the f18 compiler. Below, I summarize the current state of various efforts in clang / f18 / MLIR / LLVM regarding this. Feel free to add to the list in case I have missed something. 1. [May 2019] An OpenMPIRBuilder in LLVM was proposed for flang and clang frontends.

Samba - General mailing list wrote >> [2017/01/11 16:42:34.522067, 1] >> ../source3/librpc/crypto/gse.c:496(gse_get_server_auth_token) >> gss_accept_sec_context failed with [ Miscellaneous failure (see text): >> Failed to find cifs/hg004.humgen.0zone at HUMGEN.0ZONE(kvno 1) in keytab >> MEMORY:cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] >> [2017/01/11

Hola buenas, hace unos días el Rstudio me dejó de funcionar en una de mis maquinas Windows8. No puedo volver a un estado anterior así que mal y tampoco me vale reinsatalarlo ( aunque reinstale ambos programas R y Rstudio) porque sigue sin funcionar. No tengo muy claro que hacer. ¿Alguna ayuda? ¿Esto es una duda de R? Muchas gracias por adelantado PD a continuación os muestro mis errores Mi R

Please find the reply inline below On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 12:59 AM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Vinay Madhusudan via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Reply to Kiran Chandramohan: >> >> > You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to >> change the

Hi, I am trying to VGA passthrough Intel HD Graphics 4600 IGD with Xen-unstable 4.4 changeset 27214 and Linux kernel 3.10.0 but was not successful. Details are as follows: =============================================================================================== teo-en-ming@intel-core-i5-4430-desktop:~$ sudo xl info [sudo] password for teo-en-ming: host :

>>>>>> facing [ no shared cipher ] error with EC private keys. >>>>> the client connecting to your instance has to support ecdsa >>>>> >>>>> >>>> It does - Thunderbird 60.0b10 (64-bit) >>>> >>>> [ security.ssl3.ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_256_gcm_sha384;true ] >>>> >>>> It seems there is

>>>> facing [ no shared cipher ] error with EC private keys. >>> the client connecting to your instance has to support ecdsa >>> >>> >> It does - Thunderbird 60.0b10 (64-bit) >> >> [ security.ssl3.ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_256_gcm_sha384;true ] >> >> It seems there is a difference between the private key (rsa vs. ecc -> >>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:54 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > Of course by its nature, MLIR doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic > >> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. > > > > >

Thanks for the reply! It sounds like LLVM IR is being considered for optimizations in OpenMP constructs. There seems to be plans regarding improvement of LLVM IR Framework for providing things required for OpenMP / flang(?) Are there any design considerations which contain pros and cons about using the MLIR vs LLVM IR for various OpenMP related optimizations/ transformations? The latest RFC [