similar to: CTDB problems

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:06:35 +0200, David Disseldorp via samba wrote: > > 2017/04/19 10:40:31.294250 [ 7423]: /etc/ctdb/debug_locks.sh: line 73: > > gstack: command not found > > This script attempts to dump the stack trace of the blocked process, > but can't as gstack isn't installed - it should be available in the > gdb package. > > @Martin: would the

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:55:45 +0100, Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This morning our CTDB managed cluster took a nosedive. We had member > machines with hung smbd tasks which causes them to reboot, and the > cluster did not come back up consistently. We eventually got it more or > less stable with two nodes out of the 3, but we're still seeing

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:17:27 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This occurred again this morning, when the user reported the problem, I > found in the ctdb logs that vacuuming has been going on since last > night. The need to fix it was urgent (when isn't it?) so I didn't have > time to poke around for clues, but immediately

Hi List, I set up a ctdb cluster a couple months back. Things seemed pretty solid for the first 2-3 weeks, but then I started getting reports of people not being able to access files, or some times directories. It has taken me a while to figure some stuff out, but it seems the common denominator to this happening is vacuuming timeouts for locking.tdb in the ctdb log, which might go on

Hi Alex, On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:55:45 +0100, Alex Crow via samba wrote: > ----- Process in D state, printing kernel stack only > [<ffffffffa05b253d>] __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0 [fuse] > [<ffffffffa05b26d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20 [fuse] > [<ffffffffa05bb66c>] fuse_setlk+0x16c/0x1a0 [fuse] > [<ffffffffa05bc40f>] fuse_file_lock+0x5f/0x210 [fuse]

Hi Bob, On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:44:30 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I set up a ctdb cluster a couple months back. Things seemed pretty > solid for the first 2-3 weeks, but then I started getting reports of > people not being able to access files, or some times directories. It > has taken me a while to figure some stuff out,

Hi Martin, Thanks for reading and taking the time to reply >> ctdbd[89]: Unable to get RECORD lock on database locking.tdb for 20 seconds >> /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/debug_locks.sh: 142: >> /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/debug_locks.sh: cannot create : Directory >> nonexistent >> sh: echo: I/O error >> sh: echo: I/O error > > That's weird. The only

Hi Martin, well, it has been over a week since my last hung process, but got another one today... >> So, not sure how to determine if this is a gluster problem, an lxc >> problem, or a ctdb/smbd problem. Thoughts/suggestions are welcome... > > You need a stack trace of the stuck smbd process. If it is wedged in a > system call on the cluster filesystem then you can blame

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:48:57 -0800, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > well, it has been over a week since my last hung process, but got > another one today... > >> So, not sure how to determine if this is a gluster problem, an lxc > >> problem, or a ctdb/smbd problem. Thoughts/suggestions are welcome... > > > >

Il 04/09/18 06:00, Volker Lendecke ha scritto: > Hi! > > Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a > performance problem with gencache. > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations >> joined. >>

I set up printing IAW: http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/printing.html I've confirmed the drivers are being installed to /etc/samba/drivers/W32X86. Yet I am unable to print even a test page. I get the following error: "Test page failed to print. Would you like to view the print trouble shooter for assistance? Access is denied." And I get the following errors in my samba

Hello samba list, We're trialling Samba 3.6 and on some of our systems I see the following type of messages in the smbd and winbind logs: [2012/03/16 17:28:59.038177, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log) tdb(/var/lib/samba/messages.tdb): tdb_oob len 663932 beyond eof at 12288 [2012/03/16 17:28:59.038331, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log)

Can anyone help with some pointers to debug a problem with Samba and CTDB with smbstatus traversing the connections tdb? I've got a new two node cluster with Samba and CTDB on AIX. If I run smbstatus when the server has much user activity it hangs and the node it was run on gets banned. I see the following in the ctdb log: 2014/10/29 11:12:45.374580 [3932342]:

Hello, I'm having a permissions problem I just can't quite figure out. I can not access any directory that is owned by my userid if the permissions are 700. If I change them to 770, with my default group on the directory, then I can access the directory. This was working fine with Fedora 19 for several years, and it broke when I upgraded to Fedora 22, and still broken with F23. my

Christoph Hellwig said runs sparse: 1) page_tables.c unnecessary initialization 2) Change prototype of run_lguest and do cast in caller instead (when we add __user to cast, it runs over another line). Al Viro pointed out the ugly cast in push_lguest_stack(): 3) Stick with unsigned long for arg, removes 4 casts in total. Most importantly, I now realize that Christoph's incorrect ranting

Christoph Hellwig said runs sparse: 1) page_tables.c unnecessary initialization 2) Change prototype of run_lguest and do cast in caller instead (when we add __user to cast, it runs over another line). Al Viro pointed out the ugly cast in push_lguest_stack(): 3) Stick with unsigned long for arg, removes 4 casts in total. Most importantly, I now realize that Christoph's incorrect ranting

On 3/3/2016 2:02 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > It would help if you would provide some information about your system: > - Samba version - smb.conf - "ls -ld" of the directory - etc. Regards, > Marc Hello, version: samba-4.3.4-1.fc23.x86_64 ls -ld: ls -ld /home/blaster drwxrwx--- 76 blaster users 4096 Mar 3 14:15 /home/blaster testparm Load smb config files from

We are using Samba 4.6.15. We have users not being able to login. winbindd log shows this: [2018/06/14 14:48:44.300203, 0, pid=3228] ../source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:3292(cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_creds) netlogon_creds_cli_get returned NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [2018/06/14 14:53:43.896350, 0, pid=3228] ../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log)

Hi, This occurred again this morning, when the user reported the problem, I found in the ctdb logs that vacuuming has been going on since last night. The need to fix it was urgent (when isn't it?) so I didn't have time to poke around for clues, but immediately restarted the lxc container. But this time it wouldn't restart, which I had time to trace to a hung smbd process, and

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers