similar to: Dir ACL through windows and chmod

Thank you, but this did nothing. Users from group 'g02' can access folder '01'. But this folder has ACL set up only for group 'g01' > You could investigate using 'access based share enum = yes' > > and setting the permissions from Windows, see here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > > You will

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:26:15 +0300 Dmitry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > In need folders have to be seen (and accessed) only by appropriate > domain groups. For example, there are domain groups g01, g02, g03, > etc, users in these groups have to see only "their" folders: u01 - > \\fsrv\n\01, u02 - \\fsrv\n\02, u03 - \\fsrv\n\03 > This is done by

Hi all Background: I am not a samba expert, not even close! I have a ancient samba 3 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and I intend to migrate all files to a samba 4 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) Users will stay in S3 for now. Samba 4 joined samba 3 with no problems. I rsync'ed all files and its permissions (rsync -a ...). But... I cannot find a way that makes S4 sees S3 users and groups

"May you live in interesting times" Is this a curse or a blessing? :) I've just tested a 3.1.5 GlusterFS native client against a 3.1.3 storage pool using this volume: Volume Name: pfs-rw1 Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: jc1letgfs16-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01 Brick2: jc1letgfs13-pfs1:/export/read-write/g01

Hi, aLL Using Samba-4.3.5 as a AD-member - fileserver. It's running in OpenVZ container (ProxMox VE). Domain is also build on Samba-4.3.5 (another VM). Fileserver's VM is mounted with acl, user_xattr options, Samba compiled with ACL support. There're domain users, for example, "usr1", "usr2". They're in domain group "dg1". There's a filepath

thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:01:28 +0300 it at mdsdnr.ru wrote: > Thank you for pointing me to errors. I've corrected'em (I think), so > smb.conf now looks like: > Can I ask if you are having problems following the Samba wiki ? You still do not seem to have set up the smb.conf correctly, if you are having problems following the wiki, please say so and if possible give examples.

On Wed, 2 May 2018 17:12:30 -0300 "Ethy H. Brito via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi all > > Background: I am not a samba expert, not even close! > > I have a ancient samba 3 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and I intend > to migrate all files to a samba 4 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) > > Users will stay in S3 for now. > >

Below you will find the output from a failed multi-level model run. I am trying to estimate the following model: Pr(PLFP=1)= logistic regression -> B1_j * bm + B2_j * wm + B3_j bf + B4_j wf + B5 yrsed+ B6 age+ B7 age^2+e_ij B1_j = G01 + G11 bmxd + d1 B2_j = G02 + G12 wmxd + d2 B3_j = G03 + G13 bfxd + d3 B4_j = G04 + G14 wfxd + d4 d1-d4 freely correlated Note that there is no

Hi Lorenzo and Dale, My setup is like Lorenzo's completely based on setgid being propagated. The filesystem should determine the group used starting at a certain directory. Different "root" directories have different groups, and security is based on groups, not users. I tried all sorts of settings combinations, alseo "force directory mode = 2770", but none propagates

Hi there, I wonder if anyone can help me? I recently created an active directory setup with a primary domain controller ad1 and secondary domain controller ad2 for a domain SAMDOM. In-line with what I understand to be Samba best practices I then setup a separate file-server fs1 on which I created a file share, /fsrv/shares/OgdenFiles/. This has all been done using Samba version

What I have done bevor updating to 4.3.4 and it was working until then. I userd the map unix tab in ADUC and gave uid and gid to all users /groups but administrator. This worked until the update. Now the dcs mix up only!!! group ids with computer ids (security tab) root at s4slave exim]# getent group personal TPLK\personal:x:3000044: root at s4slave exim]# getent group reserve09$

> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. Regards, Thomas [global] available = yes smb2 leases = yes

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:20:45 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Was the certificate path bundled in the server certificate? No, as a separate file, provided from the local (intermediate) CA: ssl_cert = </etc/openssl/certs/server.cert ssl_key = </etc/openssl/private/server.key ssl_ca = </etc/openssl/certs/ca-cert-chain.pem Worked fine with 2.2.x, 2.3 gives % openssl s_client -connect XXX:993

opensuse 10/find / samba-3.0.20b-3.3 I'm trying to change directory permissions on a share so all users can modify files in the share and when I do as suggested in Ch15 of Samba Howto the following happens $ find `directory_name' -type d -exec chown nobody:users {}\; find: missing argument to `-exec' Chris Boyd Systems Engineer USIT 19-21 Aston Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1

Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in the rsyncd.conf file... [test] path = /home/test/greenlight # use chroot = true max connections = 3 lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock uid = 503 gid = 503 auth users = test incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx Uploading a tree from windows with

Samba DM config below. Directories with setgid: $ll /home4/group total 32 drwxrws--- 7 NIS\nisadmin NIS\audio 4096 Jul 24 14:14 audio drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\dok-sprava 4096 Jul 21 09:23 dok-sprava drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\poj 4096 Jul 23 08:38 poj drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\projekty 4096 Jul 23 09:14 projekty When user creates file/dir directly on linux, the

I have created a [home] share: user at jupiter:~$ sudo ls -l /srv/samba/ total 24 drwxrwxr-x 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 22 21:38 Demo drwxrwxr-x 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 15 11:51 Finance drwxrwxr-x+ 2 root domain admins 4096 Nov 25 08:08 home drwxrwxr-x+ 9 root domain admins 4096 Nov 24 21:06 Printer_drivers When i try to set the ACLs in Windows I get "Permission Denied" In

On 11.01.2018 13:20, Hauke Fath wrote: >/On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:20:45 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: />>/Was the certificate path bundled in the server certificate? />/No, as a separate file, provided from the local (intermediate) CA: />//>/ssl_cert = </etc/openssl/certs/server.cert />/ssl_key = </etc/openssl/private/server.key />/ssl_ca =

On Wed, 2 May 2018 21:46:52 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 17:12:30 -0300 > "Ethy H. Brito via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > Background: I am not a samba expert, not even close! > > > > I have a ancient samba 3 (Server role: