similar to: BIND DNS Reverse Update

In named.conf.local I have a reverse zone zone "30.168.192.in-addr.arpa" { type master; notify yes; include "/etc/bind/xfer-policy"; file "/etc/bind/db.30.168.192"; }; Am 12.04.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:34:32 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >>

Set auth-nxdomain yes; And stop/start bind9 Other source : https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/ /snap The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows dynamic

OK I have done and ad an reverse zone to my ad. manual added values are found now. Automatic updates (by client like ipconfig /renew) are still denied. Am 12.04.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:12:42 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> In named.conf.local I have a reverse zone >> >> zone

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >

Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so

there is the same problem. My setup is as follow: router (DHCP/Bind as forwarder dc1 and dc2) /etc/dhcpd.conf option domain-name-servers 192.168.30.2, 192.168.30.6; dc1 (192.168.30.2) / dc2 (192.168.30.6) are domain Controller with bind_dlz DNS, dc2 is update via axfr dc1 ist dns master and where I see the errors. client 192.168.30.175#55454: update 'samdom.example.com/IN' denied

my named.conf look like dlz "foo" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_10.so"; }; Am 07.02.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:04:30 +0100 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Windows-IP-Konfiguration >> >> >> >>

Hello Rowland, here is my named.conf* named.conf include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; named.conf.default-zones zone "." { type hint; file "/etc/bind/db.root"; }; zone "localhost" { type master; file

How to achieve DLZ for ADDC with bind9.12.x?? I have it working with 9.11 but for 9.12? dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x # database "dlopen

Hello, I have installed Samba 4 AD with bind9_dlz and automatic update. (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Setting_up_Dynamic_DNS_Updates_Using_Kerberos) Is this only working for A records? The PTR is not updated, or my setup is not complete. Where should I include /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf.update ?? Include this in /etc/bind/named.conf is no allowed. (unknown

i want to use bind 9.11beta2 version. I do not see bind9_11.so Best regards cat /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file # # For example with # include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ)

I use bind on the same maschine as samba (bind_dlz). there is no additional bind9 in my test network. the default gw (kvm host) do nat. and bind of this network does know nothink about zone "foo". I think that is a problem of the windows nslookup. I installed bind nslookup on the PC just for test and this can resolve "foo" and "foo." c:\s_tools (nslookup win)

Hello, I have try to add a new DNS Server to a existing Samba AD with bind DLZ. I have try https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration#Adding_new_records A New NS Record is add, on the old DNS dig show the new NS entry but that is not shown on the backup dns. The backup DNS is youn to domain. samba-tool drs showrepl looks good Is there a command to join a new dns server to the samba ad?

On 08/28/2015 01:58 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 18:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Bind if failing with: >> >> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; >> >> which has: >> >> # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf >> # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen >> support. >> # >>

I have done the bind config like Rowland's post. The problem is still the same. windows: nslookup foo -> nxdomain nslookup foo. -> ip of DC in linux both is return an ip Whats about the file named.conf.update in samba/private? I have try to include in named.conf or in dlz "AD DNS Zone"{ ... include ../named.conf.update } without success. My bind log errors like

Hello rowland, > > hang on a bit, the Debian link is for bind 9.8.x and the dlz reference > is for 9.8.1.dfsg-1. > I don?t recomend to use Bind 9.8.1 / 9.8.2 anymore - most distro use it but the shuold move due DLZ compile & bind bugs. and 9.8 soon goes on end of Life see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01211/81/BIND-9.8.8-Release-Notes.html > Rowland > This just

Bind if failing with: include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; which has: # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file # # For example with # include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable

On 22/09/2019 13:08, Christopher Wooley wrote: > I used the distro's compilation, samba -V : Version 4.7.6-Ubuntu, but > I think it's already running DLZ. I know I recompiled Bind9 in order > to add the DLZ necessary flags. Then you were wasting your time, Ubuntu's Bind9 is already DLZ capable > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ > Reading domain information

Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks! I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind