Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Problem with Samba 4.5.8 as a macOS server"
2017 Apr 03
0
Problem with Samba 4.5.8 as a macOS server
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Frank Heldt via samba wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk.
>
> I did setup smb.conf as suggested
>
> #
> # Options for macOS
> # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS
2018 May 13
2
move from netatalk to samba + vfsfruit
since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and
so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to
go get rid of netatalk these days?
is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble
extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them
back in the new format?
afp.conf:
appledouble = ea
ea = samba
2015 Dec 28
2
vfs_fruit: cannot remove any file
In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed.
$ rm test.txt
rm: test.txt: Resource busy
cannot remove:
OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan
OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite
OS X 10.9.5 Mavericks
can remove:
OS X 10.8.5 Mountain Lion
OS X 10.7.5 Lion
OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard
Windows 7
Environment:
Fedora rawhide
samba-4.3.3-0.fc24
smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = LOCALNET
server string
2015 Dec 26
3
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide.
>
> The EAs are not seen from clients yet.
>
> smb.conf:
> path = /export/test1/
> writable = yes
> vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr
> fruit:locking = netatalk
> fruit:encoding = native
> streams_xattr:prefix = user.
2015 Mar 11
4
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
Hi.
I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha.
I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with
Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible.
The character ":" in EA name is wrong.
The EAs are not seen from clients.
smb.conf:
[test2]
path = /export/test2
writable = yes
vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr
fruit:locking =
2015 Mar 13
3
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
> not sure, but the colon in xattr names is probably not handled
> correctly at this point. Can you please file a bugreport so we can
> track this?
Bug 11162
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
--
HAT
2015 Dec 17
2
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:14:25AM +0900, HAT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> not sure, but the colon in xattr names is probably not handled
> >> correctly at this point. Can you please file a bugreport so we can
> >> track this?
> >
> > Bug 11162
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11162
>
> I tested samba 4.3.1 on Fedora 23 and rawhide.
2020 May 29
3
Extended attributes not working on mac
I worked with Netatalk for years and want to switch to Samba now. Currently i use Ubuntu 20.04. and Debian 9 before, i had no issues with netatalk at all.
As soon as i try to add a color tag (e.g. yellow) with Mac OS 10.15.5, the tag appears shortly but hides one second later. The file system is ZFS with no special options configured.
I tried the Ubuntu package but also the builds from source
2017 Oct 01
3
Error copying files with extended attributes to Windows clients
When copying files to a Windows 10 client, an error is thrown if the
file has extended attributes. In this case, the files were all created
by an OS X client with netatalk.
I'm using Samba from the Ubuntu 16.04 repository, which is currently
4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11.
In my smb.conf:
# Netatalk configuration
vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr
fruit:encoding = native
2015 Dec 26
1
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote:
> Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>:
> > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide.
> >>
> >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet.
> >>
> >> smb.conf:
> >> path =
2015 Apr 25
2
vs_fruit - can't write to share
Hi,
i'm running Samba 4.2.1 compiled from source on an Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Server. ACL/XATTR is active and working. I tried to activate the vfs_fruite module and added the sample code:
vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr
fruit:resource = file
fruit:metadata = netatalk
fruit:locking = netatalk
fruit:encoding = native
to the share. In addition i tried the following share definition:
vfs
2015 Dec 29
2
vfs_fruit: cannot remove any file
Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote:
>> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed.
>>
>> $ rm test.txt
>> rm: test.txt: Resource busy
>>
>> cannot remove:
>> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan
>> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite
>> OS X 10.9.5
2020 Jun 01
1
Extended attributes not working on mac
I?m not sure if this is related, but there was a regression a while back in handling resource forks in folder icons. It was supposed to be fixed in 4.10.13 but I don?t think it quite works yet and I haven?t had the time to test it further yet.
-Perttu
> On 30 May 2020, at 21.00, Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> I changed the configuration
2015 Dec 26
1
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
On 26/12/15 17:33, HAT wrote:
> Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>:
>> On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide.
>>>
>>> The EAs are not seen from clients yet.
>>>
>>> smb.conf:
>>> path = /export/test1/
>>>
2020 Apr 07
1
issues with Time Machine - did macOS change how they handle things?
TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup.
I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time
2020 Jun 05
2
Extended attributes not working on mac
Any more ideas? It?s not displaying anyway :(
Martin
> Am 02.06.2020 um 14:20 schrieb Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH <martin.steiner at 3mf-media.de>:
>
> I did a fresh install of ubuntu right now and changed the configuration as you proposed,
> now there it?s showing the tag for about one second but it?s disappearing afterwards.
>
> The attr binary shows the following
2016 Oct 09
2
Mac OS Timemachine over SMB
Is it possible to backup Mac OS devices through a Samba share on Samba
4.4.6 on Fedora 24 with Time Machine? I am able to successfully advertise
the share through Avahi, connect to it in Finder, and read/write files. I
am also able to see the share as a destination in Time Machine, but
selecting it shows an error that "The selected network backup disk does not
support the required
2016 Jan 09
2
vfs_fruit: FreeBSD: attrname is wrong
In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong.
% lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt
ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment
"netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk.
The first atom "org." is removed.
source3/include/smb.h:
/* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */
#define
2016 Jun 09
6
Samba 4.2 - OS X 10.11 - permissions are being ignored
Hi,
when saving a file to this share the permissions (0777) are being
ignored under OS X 10.11.5. All files will get these permissions: 0755.
I don't know why?
Samaba Version 4.2.7-SerNet-RedHat-19.el6
CentOS release 6.7
[global]
workgroup = BAVARIA
server string = Samba Server %m
netbios name = NASBAV1
log file = /var/log/samba/%m_%a_%R.log
2023 May 09
2
MacOS clients - best options
Hi list,
we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a
3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is
CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend.
Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11
I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the
samba nodes:
(fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph