similar to: Encrypted samba mount on Linux

4.11 - But am hoping it will be broadly backported On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Draxter <admin at draxter.me> wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > > That's great news. Pretty recent commit. Which kernel version (onward) is > it in? > > > Regards, > > Draxter. > > > On 01/04/17 00:49, Steve French wrote: > > Kernel cifs supports encryption!! (Thank

Dear Team, I am trying to use this option on RHEL-6.9(samba3.6) version while accessing samba shares, but its not working?? Is this kernel specific or package specific also? setup is something as this: *[RHEL 6.9]** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** [windows-client]** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

Thanks Steve for Quick response!! *My question is*: => Accessing encrypted shares fully depends on kernel fix (as you provided), If no? => How can we use /etc/samba/smb.conf "smb encrypt = mandatory" parameter to access encrypted shares? Because using this parameter I am not able to access samba-shares either from windows/RHEL client Thanks Amit On 04/03/2017 11:48 AM,

CIFS or SMB3 mount (vers=3.0)? I doubt that RHEL has backported the encryption feature in the kernel client yet, but would be a good question for RHEL support. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:15 AM, amit kumar <amitkuma at redhat.com> wrote: > Dear Team, > I am trying to use this option on RHEL-6.9(samba3.6) version while > accessing samba shares, but its not working?? > Is this

Thanks Steve. That's great news. Pretty recent commit. Which kernel version (onward) is it in? Regards, Draxter. On 01/04/17 00:49, Steve French wrote: > Kernel cifs supports encryption!! (Thank you Pavel for good work, > redoing the transport layer for this!). > > See e.g. this series which was merged a couple months ago into > mainline Linux kernel: >

Would be good to continue to encourage backports by the distros of recent kernel cifs, not just for encryption support, but also for SMB3 DFS support and various other features, and some very exciting patches are in progress for the upcoming kernels. On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote: > Kernel cifs supports encryption!! (Thank you Pavel for good

Greetings, I am working on getting mount.cifs version: 1.11-3.2.4 on debian to mount a share on a samba server Version 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE on SuSe. This was working on older debian systems, but upon upgrading some of the systems to Lenny I am now having trouble mounting shares. Again, this was working and I have smbfs installed on the systems (which is what I used before). The samba server is set

Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0 day: 0 When the share is initially mounted: CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers CIFS VFS: Send error

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

Hello all, I have 2 identical Dell r510 servers with 10gig card, running centos 6 with samba-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64. I setup 16G ramdisk samba share on both and ran cp from local ramdisk to samba ramdisk mount. If I cp 12 1-gig files, I get combined 100MB/s transfer rate. Single file cp maxes out at about 15MB/s. Ftp transfer give me over 300MB/s. Running with 9000 MTU. Most smb.conf is

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000.

Does samba server handle multiple smb commands (not necessarily andx commands) within one packet? If a client were to send commands such as 0x2f, 0x32, 0x32 in one packet instead of three separate packets, does samba server handle it i.e. respond to each of the three requests?

Hello, I sent the following message to the Debian folks. They don't think that the Debian packaging could be responsible for the issue described there. > Well, I'm not completely convinced that we will have very useful input > for you. I don't really see any reason for this to be caused by the > Debian packaging. To check this, why not compile samba from sources,

Hi, I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command replied: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 9451: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed No I'd suggest to change the message at least: It's unclear who "we" is: The Samba Team, the client, or the server The server is a "Windows 2003 server",

Does samba 3.0.23c not support the use of O_DIRECT? When I try to open an smbmount'd file using O_DIRECT, I get EINVAL. I am able to use O_DIRECT with no problems on a block device and nfs mounts, so I know the kernel supports it. samba: 3.0.23c kernel: 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL (32-bit) I am using the below code for my test. smb fails on open(2). #include <fcntl.h> #include

Hello everyone, I'm trying to mount a CIFS share served by Windows 10 Samba with encryption. On the Windows server side, I made a regular share and told Windows via Powershell command Set-SmbServerConfiguration -EncryptData 1 to encrypt the data if possible, and via Set-SmbServerConfiguration -RejectUnencryptedAccess 1 to reject unencrypted connections instead of negotiating an unencrypted

Hello, Recently, the following problem started happening with a particular samba server: If i have a file open for reading (say, a pdf in xpdf) and then try to write to it (say, through recompiling a latex document) it complains that it cannot open the file for writing. this seems like a file lock issue but I am unsure where it is happening. My previous usage should be perfectly safe since

Hi list. I am wondering if I am running the right software to get my windows 7 shares mounted. could someone please tell me, what is the difference between samba, and smbclient? at the moment, I have samba and smbclient installed. I also have smbfs installed, though I understand this is deprecated, I just thought I might be able to get smbfs to work whereas I can't get samba, smbclient and

I have a QNAP TS-410 NAS on which I have some CIFS shares. I'm trying to copy some biggish files from a Lunix machine to the CIFS share on the NAS but have runs into problems. I've created files of various sizes and I've found that I can copy files up to size 1024MB to the CIFS share on the NAS, but when I try to copy anything larger than that the copy command hangs forever and nothing

Using samba 3.2.1, when trying to mount cifs mounts at boot from in the /etc/fstab, I get the following error in my syslog: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 After enabling debugging from the /proc interface, I get this: fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //skuld.tolharadys.net/greeneg flags: 0 fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 10 with uid: 0 fs/cifs/connect.c: