similar to: winbind requires restart after boot

Dear Colleagues, I have a dataframe with variables: [1] "ID" "category" "a11" "a12" "a13" "a21" [7] "a22" "a23" "a31" "a32" "b11" "b12" [13] "b13" "b21"

Hello, I have confirmed that the recently-reported vulnerability in Elm is also present in Elm-ME+ and thus also in Debian GNU/Linux version 1.2, prerelease version 1.3, and development tree "unstable". Below is a short diff to correct the problem. Debian GNU/Linux 1.2.x uses stock Elm 2.4pl25. Users of that version of Elm should upgrade to Elm-ME+ as detailed below. Debian 1.3

I'm trying to sort a DATAFRAME by a column "ID" that contains alphanumeric data. Specifically,"ID" contains integers all preceeded by the character "g" as in: g1, g6, g3, g19, g100, g2, g39 I am using the following code: DATAFRAME=DATAFRAME[order(DATAFRAME1$ID),] and was hoping it would sort the dataframe by ID in the following manner g1, g2, g3, g6, g19,

Does anyone have any experience using an IMAP server to authenticate Samba users? The idea is to control viability and read/write access to file/print services using an Internal only email server. Thanks, John

Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 24/08/20 alle 17:39: > [...] > As far as I am aware, SMBv1 is still readily available on Win7, but from > Samba 4.11.0, it is now disabled on Samba, so if you must use SMBv1, you > will need to set: > > client min protocol = NT1 > > server min protocol = NT1 > > in smb.conf ok, the samba server I'm using as test has

dear samba community, we have a big problem on joining a Samba 3.5.6 PDC. Hopefully anyone has an idea/suggestion. When trying to join with a Samba 4.2.10 or 4.3.9 we got the following error on client site: Failed to pull dcerpc auth: NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTOCOL_ERROR. cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_key: rpc_pipe_bind failed with error NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTOCOL_ERROR libnet_join_ok: failed to open

On 25/08/2020 08:28, Piviul via samba wrote: > Rowland penny via samba ha scritto il 24/08/20 alle 17:39: >> [...] >> As far as I am aware, SMBv1 is still readily available on Win7, but >> from Samba 4.11.0, it is now disabled on Samba, so if you must use >> SMBv1, you will need to set: >> >> client min protocol = NT1 >> >> server min protocol =

I originally posted this on the dev list and opened a bug for this but was asked to post this to the users list. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10565 Using sernet 4.1 packages. I am unable to get smbd to use private dir. Set option in smb.conf and on command line. sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.7-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-libs-4.1.7-7.el6.x86_64

I'm trying to map a network drive using my workplace's Win7 laptop to a fileserver at home. The Win7 laptop is joined to the work domain. The fileserver is my own standalone fileserver, not joined to any domain, and is configured to be accessible to everyone without authentcation. I'm not able to get this to work, with varying error messages from Windows ("The account is not

My OS Gentoo Linux Samba & krb5 version: app-crypt/heimdal-7.6.0? abi_x86_32 abi_x86_64 berkdb caps ipv6 libressl lmdb selinux ssl static-libs net-fs/samba-4.11.13-r1 abi_x86_64 acl addc addns ads client cups gpg json ldap pam profiling-data python python_single_target_python3_7 quota selinux syslog system-heimdal winbind My /etc/samba/smb.conf (testparm) Load smb config files from

I've searching the archives for 2 hours and cannot find somebody else with the same problem, so please don't kill me if this is a stupid question.. I instaled a Centos 5 Machine with the Samba3x packages of samba and winbind and joined it to a 2003 AD server domain. Do far, so good. wbinfo -t works wbinfo -u, -g works getent passwd and group also work. buuuuuuuuuuuut, groups are missing

Just testing... A few replies would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Phil

Hi, I'm having trouble to let "getent group" show the members of the group. The command is just listing the group name and gid but no members. So does "wbinfo --group-info". Is there some trick to do? "getent passwd" shows correct group memberships. smb.conf [global]     netbios name = hostname     security = ADS     workgroup = D1     realm =

dear samba community, we have a big problem on joining a Samba 3.5.6 PDC. Hopefully anyone has an idea/suggestion. When trying to join with a Samba 4.2.10 or 4.3.9 we got the following error on client site: Failed to pull dcerpc auth: NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTOCOL_ERROR. cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_key: rpc_pipe_bind failed with error NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTOCOL_ERROR libnet_join_ok: failed to open

Hello, If I try to set acl under windows, something very strange appears. For instance, if I set something for the user samuel I get this with the command getfacl : default:_*group*_:samuel.ruet:r-x And if I set something for the group sa-si I get this : default:_*use*_r:sa-si:r-x Under windows all seems good... I recently change idmap config... ( add rid backend ) Here is my smb.conf :

On 29/10/2020 21:00, Jacek via samba wrote: > My OS Gentoo Linux > > Samba & krb5 version: > > app-crypt/heimdal-7.6.0? abi_x86_32 abi_x86_64 berkdb caps ipv6 > libressl lmdb selinux ssl static-libs > net-fs/samba-4.11.13-r1 abi_x86_64 acl addc addns ads client cups gpg > json ldap pam profiling-data python python_single_target_python3_7 > quota selinux syslog

Hi! I''ve spent quite a while before I understood that for Puppet to see changes in custom functions'' code Puppetmaster needs to be restarted. Is this a normal behaviour or may be it''s a bug ? -- Best regards, Sergey Arlashin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

The general answere here is try and see, as you could totally test it on your own. The certificate is read at startup and put in memory for the rest of the execution time. Dovecot won't monitor the file for changes on disk, as this would waste CPU cycles and make dovecot only slower for no reason. The process (or person) that changes the file is responsible to restart dovecot to reload

Hi, On 14.03.19 09:33, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > On 3/14/19 9:32 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: >> The general answere here is try and see, as you could totally test it >> on your own. The certificate is read at startup and put in memory for >> the rest of the execution time. Dovecot won't monitor the file for >> changes on disk, as this

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > On 3/14/19 9:32 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > > The general answere here is try and see, as you could totally test it > > on your own. The certificate is read at startup and put in memory for > > the rest of the execution time. Dovecot won't monitor the file for > > changes on