similar to: Samba3 ACL

Hi , We migrated to AD account in a Ubuntu 16.04 (Samba 4.3.11)and came across issues with user shares. Some of the users were able to access the shares and some were not. The server in question has both AD and File and we followed the samba wiki to enable the Windows ACL To migrate , we ran the following samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba.PDC/dbdir --realm=lin.GROUP

I am not 100% clear as to when the following is required in smb.conf on a member server: vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs#Enable_extended_ACL_support_in_smb.conf I have confirmed Samba is compiled with ACL support: [root at centos7member ~]# smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL

I am not 100% clear as to when the following is required in smb.conf on a member server: vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs#Enable_extended_ACL_support_in_smb.conf I have confirmed Samba is compiled with ACL support: [root at centos7member ~]# smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL

Please provide a greater number of old versions for new Linux versions... For example, Im using Ubuntu 8.04 and it's ok... but I cant go to 8.10 cause there is no Wine 1.1.2 for that Ubuntu version provided .deb packages archive, and I cant launch some programs and games on higher Wines... And at least for now we dont rly have Wine working so well that we wouldn't want to try more than

Rowland, The wiki suggested doing "smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL" and expecting to get back "HAVE_LIBACL". This is not the case on our IBM system with 4.10.6. The current version from IBM is 4.10.13 - considering upgrading in the hopes "HAVE_LIBACL" is present if I really need it. On the other hand, "smbd -b" does report that smbd was built with vfs_aixacl

On 2019-02-18 11:46 am, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:58:01 -0500 > > I have proven that it does work, I have pointed you at the > documentation. > This leads to one of two things: > > You cannot understand the wiki pages and if so, what can you not > understand ? If you can let me know, I will try to clarify it for you > and update the wiki.

Hi, I am sure it has been discussed extensively somewhere, but I cannot find a satisfactory solution so far. We have a samba3 PDC running with Win7 machines (with the right hacks) without problems. We have been asked to add an old WinXP machine to the network but without success so far. The setup is as follow: Server : Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Clients: Win 7 Ultimate (working) &

hi all, We are using squid 25s1 with kernel 2.4.19 and iproute2(+julian''s Pathes) with the following acl.. acl short_path dst 128.0.0.0/8 tcp_outgoing_address myIp2nd short_path we are linked to 2 isp--one having satelite & the other OFC. We want the above mentioned network to go thru OFC(ispB) as the sibling resides there. But when i use squidclient mgr:server_list

Am 11.09.18 um 10:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:54:32 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 07.09.18 um 20:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 19:09:37 +0200 >>> "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

Am 09.11.18 um 09:06 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > We still saw now security tab fpr samba shares in Windows. Not as > domain-admin, not as member of a user with the needed privilege. > > The security tab is there for local drives and windows-server-shares, > only samba-4.8.6-shares miss it. > > I will recheck everything ... # smbd -b | grep HAVE_LIBACL

Hi, I have discovered a bug when using CIFS mounted shares from Samba4 on a Linux machine. We use custom ACLs to allow certain groups extra access to home shares, setting 'user:staff:r-x' using setfacl, along with the related 'default' ACL so that it propagates to newly created directories. For this to work, we also set 'mask::rwx'. These shares have group and other

Thank you for your answer! You are right, but I still don't know how to build such a list dynamically using LLVM API with user type inside (I don't know this type yet ofc). 2013/4/15 Cristianno Martins <cristiannomartins at gmail.com> > Hi, > > I guess you could use a template with a std::vector: you don't need to > define right away the type, if you create a

On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:39:55 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 09.11.18 um 09:06 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > > We still saw now security tab fpr samba shares in Windows. Not as > > domain-admin, not as member of a user with the needed privilege. > > > > The security tab is there for local

Hi, Sorry, but I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to do. I guess you want some kind of superclass of some set of classes that are defined in the llvm api(?). In that case, which are specifically the types you could have in this list you're trying to define? -- Cristianno Martins On Tuesday, 16 de April de 2013 at 04:22, B B wrote: > Thank you for your answer! >

Hi! I want to implement a list (which operates like ArrayList in Java). I can use ArrayType from llvm, but at creation time I have to specify size so there is a problem when I want to extend it (I can reallocate it ofc). Moreover I need to implement all the operations (inserting, removing etc.) manually. I though that maybe I can use std::vector, but there is another problem - std::vector is a

I looked all over the place, and cannot find current answer. I want to store passwords/password hashes on my RODC, so that when my DC (Windows) fails, my users can still connect using RODC. The current state that is described (by 3 years old docs) says its WIP, so I'm not sure what to expect? Also, in documentation there is no option, to allow for preloading whole group of users, is that

Hi Rowland, >From the top down, I'm going to try and cover every step involved in the wiki and give you as much info as I can in the hope that we can get this issue resolved, or at least determine that there is nothing wrong with my config and that the underlying array has to be the weak point, even if none of us know why. *Step 1: Filesystem support* We need the filesystem to support

Hi, I guess you could use a template with a std::vector: you don't need to define right away the type, if you create a template of it. It should look something like that: template<class B> class List { std::vector<B> myList; void insert (int pos, B elem); } template <class B> void List::add (int pos, B elem) { myList.insert(myList.begin()+pos, elem); } Then,

Unfortunately I don't know how to write AC macros to properly solve this problem but Cygwin does not (any longer) include cygwin/acl.h from sys/acls.h which is required for Solaris ACL data structures to work. So the CASE statement improperly short-circuits the logic. I have confirmed that Rsync builds using POSIX ACLs but haven't tested said functionality. diff --git a/configure.ac

Hi Rowland, Thank you for that. We did the testing in a Vmware VM, the actual production box is hosted in SmartOS. Didn't encounter the issues during testing. I am pretty sure it is not a group, it is a user. When I check the AD , I see it as a user. The user with the issue is doesn't have that listed in members of section. With the idmap stuff, the server in question is both DC and