similar to: Samba 4.6 ID Mapping clarification

Hi all, I'm using Samba (AD) under Debian Buster. Testparm tells me the idmap of TDB and AD would overlap. However the configured range don't. Thanks in advance, Michael # testparm rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf

Hi, i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second dc.... for example: the new DC2 tells me: getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol # owner: root # group: BUILTIN\134administrators user::rwx user:root:rwx user:BUILTIN\134administrators:rwx user:BUILTIN\134users:r-x user:ELEMAY\134guest:rwx user:ELEMAY\134domain\040guests:r-x

On 6/14/2016 1:16 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 14/06/16 17:38, J. Echter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second >> dc.... >> >> for example: >> >> the new DC2 tells me: >> >> getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> >> # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> #

using testparm of 4.6.0rc2 against the smb.conf of a production server (the production server is not using rc2, dont worry) produces the error: [root at fwborda1 samba-460rc2]# testparm /root/smb.conf Load smb config files from /root/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]"

Hi Rowland, Those tests were made on DC (araucaria), not a domain member. root at araucaria:~# testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC Press

On 6/14/2016 2:50 PM, J. Echter wrote: > Am 14.06.2016 um 20:47 schrieb lingpanda101 at gmail.com: >> On 6/14/2016 1:16 PM, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 14/06/16 17:38, J. Echter wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second >>>> dc.... >>>> >>>> for example:

Zitat von Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > This isn't a bug, it is a feature, winbind no longer returns > anything from AD for 'getent passwd', but it will return the info > from 'getent passwd USERNAME' Hi Rowland, thank you for your answer... I think, this is not so fine, but if this is not a bug, but a feature, I cannot do other but accept it...

Greetings, All! I'm trying final steps of my long upgrade process, but I've got hit by the unexpected. When everything seemingly run fine in the end, I'm unable to browse the local shares of the DC. # smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[CCENTER] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.11-Ubuntu] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- Error returning

Hi mathias, thanks for taking time to see this issue. In my case is not a AD, is still a NT4 style. I will try the option, thanks. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:31 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alberto, > > No idea about your issue as I'm playing with Samba to build AD only, I can > only tell you that I did tested on my Samba AD DC and I can use

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:56:47 +0100 Ole Traupe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I only get the usernames: > Same on member servers, btw. Initially I thought this comes from > "winbind: use default domain", but this is neither present on my DCs > nor would it have any effect (afaik). This is what is confusing me, I know of no way to get the username

Hi Andrew, I don't understand why 2 systems running the exact same version of Samba have different behaviour. Is this an option I can disable? regards, John On 19/04/16 11:29, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:29 +1000, John Gardeniers wrote: >> I'm setting up a test domain in order to try out Sudoers LDAP and >> have >> run into a problem that has

I just installed samba on a new server, 3.4.5-42, 64 bit version from Sernet, over CentOS 5.4. When running testparm, I get the following warning: rlimit_max: rlimit_max (8192) below minimum Windows limit (16384) I searched Google for some answer but I couldn't find a satisfactory one. What should I do to solve this? Can someone from the Samba team enlighten me on this? Thank you!

On 10/15/2019 10:13 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/10/2019 14:23, gw1500 via samba wrote: >> On 10/15/2019 6:03 AM, Giulio via samba wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:41 PM gw1500 via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks. I tried the workaround but it was no help. I'm a little >>>> fuzzy on

On 14/06/16 17:38, J. Echter wrote: > Hi, > > i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second dc.... > > for example: > > the new DC2 tells me: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol > > # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol > # owner: root > # group: BUILTIN\134administrators > user::rwx > user:root:rwx >

Am 14.06.2016 um 20:47 schrieb lingpanda101 at gmail.com: > On 6/14/2016 1:16 PM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 14/06/16 17:38, J. Echter wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i provisioned a domain and all went well, until i added the second >>> dc.... >>> >>> for example: >>> >>> the new DC2 tells me: >>> >>>

Hi, is time to get help. I have a DOMAIN with samba3.6.23-9.el5_11 Centos 5.11 x64 Windows XP/Win7/Win8.1 domain no issues.(x32/x64) I have even 2 Linux Centos 5.x in my domain x64 Now, I have add 1 Centos 6.x x64 updated. Samba 3.6.23-35.el6_8 I had setup LDAP client on this server to get users/groups and add to my domain with net rpc join, no issue. I can see the server on my domain no

Solaris 11 include samba 3.6.25. I compiled samba 4.5.1 using GCC 4.8 and gmake. Had set following env variables to make sure krb5.conf was found # CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ # C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ After setting "client ldap sasl wrapping = plain" I was able to join to a Windows 2008 domain with samba 4.

2015-11-04 17:11 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 04/11/15 06:24, Roger Wu wrote: > >> Hi, Rowland, >> >> Thanks for your advise. I've been updated the version to 4.2.5, the rpm >> query is as below, >> but it still didn't work. >> >> [root at testcad16 samba]# rpm -qa | grep samba >>

Hello, i upgraded my ctdb cluster (3 nodes) from samba 4.7.7 to 4.8.3. Followed the steps under "policy" in this wikipage https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_CTDB_cluster. I shutdown all CTDB nodes and upgraded them. After the upgrade i started all nodes and ctdb status shows: Number of nodes:3 pnn:0 192.168.199.52   OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 192.168.199.53   OK pnn:2

Hi All, I've configured a Fedora 20 server with samba to share a few user directories and a printer. From a Windows 8 laptop, I am able to address the samba server by it's name (fs1) From a Fedora 20 client (ws1), I am able to address the samba server by IP address, but not by name. [gruss at ws1 ~]$ smbclient --version Version 4.1.15 [gruss at ws1 ~]$ smbclient -L 192.168.1.10