similar to: ldap owncloud and samba ad

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "ldap owncloud and samba ad"

2019 Sep 24
2
Repacking database from v1 to v2 format: how long does it take?
On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> hi all, >> >> I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the >> database >> conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. >> >> On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the >>
2016 Aug 30
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 07:46 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 14:29 -0300, Maiquel Consalter via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Group, > > i have 3 DC with samba4 with Centos 7, they are showing the CPU > > with > > 100% > > in all DC. The centos 7 is the basic installation and samba4 > > compile.I have > > 2.000 machine
2022 Sep 19
1
High cpu load on LDAP
hello, I often have the problem of high load on the LDAP processes. 1-3 LDAP processes cause 100% cpu load for approx. 10 sec. This happens regularly in intervals of 2-3 minutes. How can I find out which client is causing this load and why? How can I configure the logging to see who/what is causing the LDAP process? We have about 5000 users, 4000 clients in our AD with 4 DCs with Samba 4.16.4.
2024 Nov 19
1
High cpu load on LDAP
On 19/11/24 02:29, Heinz H?lzl via samba wrote: > hi, > > I have to activate the thread again ... > > we keep having preformance problems on the DC, especially on Monday > morning when the PCs are switched on and the users log in. > > some ldap-searches take a very long time, sometimes even over 15 > seconds > > e.g: > > ldapsrv_SearchRequest: LDAP
2022 Sep 29
1
High cpu load on LDAP
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 14:04 +0000, Heinz H?lzl via samba wrote: > hello, > I often have the problem of high load on the LDAP processes. > 1-3 LDAP processes cause 100% cpu load for approx. 10 sec. This > happens > regularly in intervals of 2-3 minutes. > How can I find out which client is causing this load and why? > How can I configure the logging to see who/what is causing
2020 Nov 04
2
AD Joining Failed in middle
Thanks Rowland for the Reply On 04/11/20 5:44 pm, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 04/11/2020 12:02, Biswajit Banerjee via samba wrote: >> My Apologies >> >> It is? Windows 2008 AD >> > In which case, it should work, so what OS are you using ? Centos 8 > > Are you using OS samba packages or have you compiled Samba yourself ? Complied > > All you really
2024 Nov 18
1
High cpu load on LDAP
hi, I have to activate the thread again ... we keep having preformance problems on the DC, especially on Monday morning when the PCs are switched on and the users log in. some ldap-searches take a very long time, sometimes even over 15 seconds e.g: ldapsrv_SearchRequest: LDAP Query: Duration was 15.74s, SearchRequest by S-1-5-21-xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-8585 from ipv4:192.168.35.117:49240
2020 Mar 05
4
DCs from 4.10.x to 4.11.x
Am 05.03.20 um 10:48 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 05.03.20 um 10:40 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 05/03/2020 08:34, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > >>> downgrade or fix ;-)? ? >>> >> This hit me yesterday, restart the DC, check with 'ps ax' and I think >> you will find that only 'Samba' has started. If so
2016 Aug 19
7
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Group, i have 3 DC with samba4 with Centos 7, they are showing the CPU with 100% in all DC. The centos 7 is the basic installation and samba4 compile.I have 2.000 machine authenticated in this DC, is WinX, Win7, Win8 and Win10 . Someone have problem with samba4 with centos cpu 100%. ? Attached my config. Tks. -------------- next part -------------- Press enter to see a dump of your service
2018 Sep 26
5
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
Hello, I worked on a code size analysis tool for a 'week of code' project and think that it might be useful enough to upstream. The tool is inspired by bloaty (https://github.com/google/bloaty), but tries to do more to attribute code size in actionable ways. For example, it can calculate how many bytes inlined instances of a function added to a binary. In its diff mode, it can show how
2018 Oct 01
4
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (my vote, somewhat biased - is that I'd love to see more investment in Bloaty (to keep all these sort of size analysis tools and tricks in one place), but sort of accept folks are probably going to keep building more infrastructure for this sort of thing in LLVM directly) I get where that comes
2018 Oct 01
3
RFC: Adding a code size analysis tool
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:25 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:24 PM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com <mailto:jfbastien at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:16 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> (my vote, somewhat biased - is that
2016 Aug 30
0
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Andrew, >Also, how many users, groups and in particular group members in each >group (and in total)? >If you have large numbers of group members, then Samba 4.5 will help a >lot. We have 53k users and 580 groups. 2016-08-30 5:17 GMT-03:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 07:46 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > On Fri,
2019 Sep 24
0
Repacking database from v1 to v2 format: how long does it take?
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 11:44 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba > > wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > > > I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the > > > database > > > conversion from v1 to v2
2020 Jun 18
3
Installing owncloud on CentOS 7 server
I transitioning an owncloud installation from a C6 server to a new C7 server and used yum install owncloud to install it on the C7 server. I expected /var/www/owncloud to be generated but alas not. Quick Googling just showed examples of installing from the latest owncloud repository but not using yum. Have I missed something obvious when using yum to install?
2020 Feb 23
2
OwnCloud vs NextCloud
OwnCloud came first, but IIRC, when the business managers took it partially commercial, the original developer split and forked it to make NextCloud as he didn't like the OwnCloud policies [1] [1] https://karlitschek.de/2016/04/big-changes-i-am-leaving-owncloud-inc-today/ -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz
2016 May 22
2
Upcoming OwnCloud changes
Just a FYI folks ... I am running OwnCloud 9.0.2 on CentOS 6.7 and php-7.0 with no issues. I installed the Webtatic repo which has several versions of PHP available for CentOS 6 and 7. I then used the official OwnCloud ce:stable repo to add the cloud software. In a leap of faith, and because this CentOS VM doesn't run anything other than OwnCloud, I used the 'php70w' PHP repo
2020 Feb 23
1
OwnCloud vs NextCloud
> On Feb 22, 2020, at 9:14 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > On February 22, 2020 9:12:17 PM EST, John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: >> OwnCloud came first, but IIRC, when the business managers took it >> partially >> commercial, the original developer split and forked it to make >> NextCloud as >> he didn't like the
2016 May 23
1
Upcoming OwnCloud changes
On 23 May 2016 7:36 a.m., "Sorin Srbu" <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Chuck Munro > > Sent: den 22 maj 2016 17:11 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes > > >
2020 Mar 07
1
Long re-index on upgrade from 4.10.x to 4.11.x
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:09 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/03/2020 14:58, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > > Am 05.03.20 um 10:48 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > > Am 05.03.20 um 10:40 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > > > > On 05/03/2020 08:34, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > > > > > downgrade or fix ;-) ?