similar to: Veto files used to allow only one extension to be written to the share

Good evening, I'd like to know where I can request a feature or bug report from Samba. Other free software projects that I work with issue directly on the Github project, others have a portal for this type of request. Thank you in advance for the info. Sincerely, Tácio Andrade. IT Consultant at MultiTI.com.br ᐧ

Anyone know anything about it? I found a list with all the extensions used by Ransomware at the moment, but they are almost 800 and with that amount I think I will have problems using the veto files, as well as the red tape of updating them. Please, if anyone knows anything about it, please share. ᐧ 2017-03-15 23:51 GMT-03:00 Tácio Andrade <tacioandrade at gmail.com>: > Good night.

Many thanks for the reply. I hope to contribute even a little with this software that I have used for so long. Sincerely, Tácio Andrade. ᐧ 2017-03-14 2:10 GMT-03:00 Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:52 -0300, Tácio Andrade via samba wrote: > > Good evening, I'd like to know where I can request a feature or bug > report > > from Samba.

On 05/15/2016 01:00 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 22:42 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect >> against ransomware? > > I've not had to look into this properly, but I would suggest that > regular and genuinely offline backups and regular Read Only snapshots. > > Andrew

Am 17.05.2016 um 09:47 schrieb Fabian Cenedese: > >> Am 16.05.2016 um 07:32 schrieb ToddAndMargo: >>> May I surmise that all the encrypted file now have >>> an extra extension of ".crypt"? So it is easy to >>> see who got clobbered. >> >> how do you come to that conclusion and even if some malware acts that way what makes you sure you can

On 05/17/2016 01:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2016 um 03:13 schrieb ToddAndMargo: >> On 05/15/2016 01:00 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >>> On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 22:42 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect >>>> against ransomware? >>> >>>

Hi All, Is there anything in Samba that will help protect against ransomware? -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thank you so much for your response. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:36 AM Malhar Thakkar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results >> produced by ProfileInfo.

Am 16.05.2016 um 07:32 schrieb ToddAndMargo: > May I surmise that all the encrypted file now have > an extra extension of ".crypt"? So it is easy to > see who got clobbered. how do you come to that conclusion and even if some malware acts that way what makes you sure you can rely on that? IMHO it would only be so when the developer of the ransomware is a fool! why should he

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:28 PM Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM Malhar Thakkar <cs13b1031 at iith.ac.in> > wrote: > >> Thank you so much for your response. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>

On 05/19/2016 11:09 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, ToddAndMargo, > > Du meintest am 19.05.16: > >>>>>> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect >>>>>> against ransomware? > > [...] > >>> months ago there where ransomware which discovered shares without a >>> drive letter assigend > >> yes, I just read

I'm not aware of the last, but in previous versions, ransomware encrypt all files and after this he delete original files. If you have a trash/recycle configured, you can recover these files. Em 17/05/2016 8:26 AM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> escreveu: > Ransomware Overview: > >

I had to deal with ransomware at the end of April. One of the PCs on my customer's network was infected by opening a realistic looking email apparently from a genuine supplier to the company and personally addressed. The infection occurred on Wednesday, but encryption of the server only took place late on Friday afternoon, presumably having obtained encryption keys from the criminals. The

Hi all, Just out of curiosity: is there anything we can do, on the samba side, to counter the recent ransomware attacks? (or limit the damage done) I'm thinking like: limit the number of files per second a client (workstation) is allowed to edit, or some other smart tricks..? It would be nice if samba could be an extra layer of defense. Something perhaps a vfs module could help with..?

Hey all, I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results produced by ProfileInfo. It essentially computes the number of iterations performed by a loop from the profiling information available. The code snippet in my pass looks something like this. BasicBlock *header = loop->getHeader(); ProfileInfo &pi = getAnalysis< ProfileInfo >(); for(pred_iterator

Just in case another person comes to get stuck on this on Mac OS: http://web.mit.edu/mfloyd/www/computing/mac/gv/ This link explains the process on getting gv installed since Xaw3d dependency even has a 'error' (actually missing few parameters) on a line that prevents code compilation that needs to be fixed before configuring and make it works. -- I have gv installed now and my bash

Dear all, I just created this revision <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34937> but I did not receive any email for it even though it says 'Automatically Subscribed' on the right. Also, even my profile shows no trace of the aforementioned revision. It shows that my last activity was on 24th May. Additionally, just to verify that I am not receiving any emails from Phabricator, I logged

Hi Joey, I think there is still something missing. I ignored the -j as you mentioned and saw on the documentation that to compile on debug mode I could do so using: $./configure --disable-optimized As a result by the end I compiled llvm2.9 I got: llvm[0]: ***** Completed Debug Build llvm[0]: ***** Note: Debug build can be 10 times slower than an llvm[0]: ***** optimized build. Use make

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

Hi Joey, Still the same message. I am running it from llvm-2.9/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -ast-view ~/smd.c Is this where you were referring to? Best, Carlos Andrade http://carlosandrade.co 2012/6/9 Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> > You need to run the clang from the build directory. Something like > ./Debug+Asserts/bin/clang > > Joey > > > On 9 June 2012 22:52,