similar to: Allow user without uidNumber to access to a Samba member file server

Ok, these : > For Administrator / Domain Admins / System / Creator Owner = Full > Control on folder, subfolders and files Are not available on the "Share security" but are on the "Security" So the "Share security settings" need only. Everyone FULL CONTROLL ( or Verified users ) And i think your done. > For Administrator / Domain Admins / System /

Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 13:17 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:23:23 +0200 > Arnaud Cruzel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I have a samba server member for file sharing configured like > > below.  > > Domains controllers are on samba too.  > > Every servers are on samba

Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 16:08 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:13:43 +0200 > Arnaud Cruzel <a.cruzel at ifporient.org> wrote: > > > > > > OK, I tried that. After what there is no long problems for access > > to > > file server by an user without uidNumber. But now it's impossible > > for > > unix

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:13:43 +0200 Arnaud Cruzel <a.cruzel at ifporient.org> wrote: > > OK, I tried that. After what there is no long problems for access to > file server by an user without uidNumber. But now it's impossible for > unix client to access to samba shares on this server. You never mentioned Unix users The 'rid' backend works by calculating the users

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:56 AM Arnaud Cruzel via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I'd like this behavior to permit computers to access to shares for > installing application with GPO set on DC and applied to computers > instead of users section in the GPO. when a client connects to a share, smbd spawns a new process owned by that user, which is why it needs a

Hi When mapping a drive to the samba server the share name that appears in Windows XP for instance is: Shares on 'Samba 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 (fs1)' (T:) Anyway to remove the 'Samba and version number from the name of the share so it's just plain: Shares on 'fs1 (fs1)' (T:) Thanks D.

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

Hai, Does anyone know more if this is adressed or point me to the bug report? There should be one, but i cant find it. Im finding the following again, tested with samba 4.4.5, now samba 4.5.3. These reports go back to the year 2013. I searched in my mail samba folder for S-1-5-18 The problem. I create a "computer" Scheduled task. Now this task MUST run as : SYSTEM (S-1-5-18)

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:23:23 +0200 Arnaud Cruzel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I have a samba server member for file sharing configured like below.  > Domains controllers are on samba too.  > Every servers are on samba 4.5.3. > When I created the domain I activated rfc2307. > > Now I think rfc2307 was a bad idea... > You could

Editing the xml.. results in same error. ( which is logical ) The exact event from windows. Eventlog info: Source : Group Policy Scheduled Tasks. ID : 4098 USER : SYSTEM Error code : Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070534 No mapping between account names and security IDs was done.' This error was suppressed. So I'll wait until this

Complete event id of : > But still, events log show a warning about kerberos ticket from LsaSrv > source and right after a permission denied on GPT.ini And a getfacl of the problem GPO SID please, i'll check. And a output of ipconfig /all on the problem pc. And question, dedicated IP or dhcp IP? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hi Andrew, thanks so much for the feedback. Yes, you're 100% right. I'm new at this and originally changed the default GPO, however subsequently reset the default and created a new GPO. (so this getfacl output is post creation of a new GPO) The getfacl output is shown here: # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

I was experiencing problems with Group Policy Objects. The Windows Event Viewer spits out so many different errors, most of them less than helpful, so Iwas seeking help here with some of those messages. In the end, and after many hours and even days of researching this problem, I seem to have pin-pointed the main issue to some simple permission irregularities that I don't know how to

Hi James The output is as follows... wbinfo --gid-info=10013 => CT\domain admins:x:10013: wbinfo --gid-info=10014 => CT\domain users:x:10014: wbinfo --uid-info=3000000 => BUILTIN\administrators:*:3000000:3000000::/home/BUILTIN/administrators:/bin/false wbinfo --uid-info=3000008 => CT\domain admins:*:3000008:3000008::/home/CT/domain admins:/bin/false Yes I have set

Hai,   ! this problem came and is gone again but its an intresting thing thats why im putting it on the samba list. I added time  in the message to make more clear when what is done.   Upgrade samba from 4.4.5-3 to 4.5.3 yesterday.   Time : 10:15 in the morning. Environment: DC1 : debian Jessie samba 4.5.3 DC2 : debian Jessie samba 4.5.3 MEMBERs : in general samba 4.5.3 ( few

I found this one. Check which one works for you. http://www.eventid.net/display-eventid-40960-source-LSASRV-eventno-8508-phase-1.htm Im sure this is not a samba configuration problem. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens L.P.H. van Belle > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:18 > Aan: samba at

I hate 'me too' replies - but I have also been struggling with this for some years in my multi-DC environment. (yes, replicated sysvol via lsyncd + rsync; permissions looked identical via getfacl last time I checked). Sometimes a client machine will run gpupdate just fine; other times it will fail, seemingly randomly. My next step was going to be to run wireshark on a client machine to

Hi, Thanks for reading. I have recently started to try and get Windows 10 machines working with our Samba 4.3.3 domain controller and have run into a few issues with gpupdate /force The error given by Windows is “The processing of group policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\domain.com.au <smb://domain.com.au>” etc. Its interesting because access is denied with the file path