similar to: ERROR: Invalid idmap range for domain *!

On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 21:58 +0000, Miguel Medalha via samba wrote: > Today I upgraded two AD DCs to Samba 4.60. > > All looks well. I noticed greater speed in some areas. > > When I run "testparm", the output contains the following: > > idmap range not specified for domain '*' > ERROR: Invalid idmap range for domain *! > > "samba-tool

After updating my test AD DC from samba version 4.5.5 to 4.6.0 and running testparm as asvised, I get the error idmap range not specified for domain '*' ERROR: Invalid idmap range for domain *! After I get trhe dump of the service definitions, I notice that there is a line in the [global] section: idmap config * : backend - tdb However, my smb.conf doesn't contain any such line

I just installed samba on a new server, 3.4.5-42, 64 bit version from Sernet, over CentOS 5.4. When running testparm, I get the following warning: rlimit_max: rlimit_max (8192) below minimum Windows limit (16384) I searched Google for some answer but I couldn't find a satisfactory one. What should I do to solve this? Can someone from the Samba team enlighten me on this? Thank you!

Hi All, What causes this error in /var/log/messages when on XP-Pro client boots up? winbindd[4041]: idmap uid range missing or invalid winbindd[4041]: idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs winbindd[4041]: [2009/04/02 19:38:22, 0] nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_alloc_init(820) rn1 winbindd[4041]: ERROR: Initialization failed for alloc backend, deferred! Many thanks, -T

Hello dear Samba developers I am now configuring a PDC for a small LAN, using Samba 3.0.32 from Sernet. While the work advances I am studying Samba. I am not very experienced -- in fact I would better be called a beginner with Samba -- so please forgive me for any obvious errors with my observations. ---------- I compared the output of "testparm -v" with the parameters listed and

Hi there I've just upgraded a working samba-3.5.8 CentOS-4.9 (yes - pretty old) server to samba-3.6.1 and can't change "idmap config". We almost immediately had issues with it not working for some users - and the logs showed we'd run out of idmap mappings (strange that never happened before with the older version...) Anyway, I edited smb.conf so that idmap config

Recently there has been a lot of chatter of where and when to specify ID mapping ranges. In fact, the wiki is quite explicit now: /"ID mapping back ends are not supported in the smb.conf file on a Samba Active Directory (AD) domain controller (DC)."/ I also saw a recommendation on this list to run testparm to check the smb.conf for problems after upgrading to Samba 4.6. Last

Greetings, Rowland Penny! > Yes, don't post the output of 'testparm -v', just post the output of > 'testparm'. Also don't post a 'diff', post two separate smb.conf files, > better still post them into a post here. > I refuse to try and wade through all those parameters, when most of > them are DEFAULT settings. I wasn't expecting anything

Hi all, I'm using Samba (AD) under Debian Buster. Testparm tells me the idmap of TDB and AD would overlap. However the configured range don't. Thanks in advance, Michael # testparm rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf

> > in his smb.conf because he is using bind9, replacing 'winbindd' in that > line, should be the same as 'server services = -winbindd +winbind' on a > DC that uses the internal DNS server. If you run 'samba-tool testparm > -v' on a DC that uses the internal DNS, even though there is no 'server > services' line shown in smb.conf, you will get

I hope that someone here can give some advice on the following: I have a Samba based Active Directory. A CentOS 7.6 machine runs as a file server and hosts the Windows user profiles for all the Windows workstations. Now management has decided that they need a Windows server for a couple of administrative applications, which need MS SQL Server. That would be the only role of this Windows.

Hi there-- I'm using Debian testing ("Sarge") and recently upgraded to 3.0.0beta2-1 from 2.2. It broke, and I've been pulling my hair our trying to get it working again. I've gone to a Samba HowTo troubleshooting guide: http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba/samba-diagnose.html and gotten successfully through test #4 (NetBIOS Name Resolution) but can't get anything on

>> Did you think to run 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --help' ? No, I didn't, I just assumed that the message "'samba' will remove them daily, 'samba-tool domain tombstones expunge' would do that immediately" would mean exactly that :-). It worked now. Thank you!

A question to the Samba developers (or anyone else who knows the answer): Since Samba (as of version 4.2) can now use the "normal" winbindd daemon, I suppose that RID mapping on a AD DC will work in the same way as it works on a member server. So, if I configure it in exactly the same way as in my member servers and then replace the UID/GID of all files in the DC with the new ones,

Rowland, I checked and got the entry for root in idmap.ldb To get 'getent' to show users on the DC, you need to have > libnss_winbind set up just like on a domain member. Okay. I installed the libnss-winbind package, configured the links to the lib, and now the getent passwd administrator works. Now, when running the testparm the error occurs: idmap range not specified for domain

I'm getting this error on a Redhat 9 install. I was all working fine and now for some reason its not. here's part of the log leading up to the error. [2003/11/25 10:17:02, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:winbindd_param_init(379) winbindd: idmap uid range missing or invalid [2003/11/25 10:17:02, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:winbindd_param_init(380) winbindd: cannot continue, exiting.

> . I do not think that you can turn off the built-in 'winbind' > except by using the separate 'winbindd' daemon. > Yes, and I think the same as you. He would STILL BE USING WINBINDD. The only difference was that he would also be including a EXPLICIT -winbind instruction instead of only disabling it implicitly. If you don't see the difference I don't know

Hi guys. I had migrate samba PDC with LDAP as backend: Version 3.6.23-13.el5_11 Centos 6.x. To Centos 7.x with samba 4.6.2 But got some errors related to idmap went I run testparm: idmap range not specified for domain '*' ERROR: Invalid idmap range for domain *! This are my settings right on my extend file running testparm -v ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap idmap backend = tdb idmap

Greetings, Rowland Penny! > You ask for help with a problem, but instead of posting useful info, > you post a link to what at first seems to be the result of 'testparm > -v' and expect someone to wade through this to try and identify what > is causing your problem. There is over 170 lines in the 4.6 smb.conf. Thanks for taking your time counting them. > Well, you are

Oh! It's works. Thanks a lot. God bless you all. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qui., 30 de mai. de 2024 ?s 10:40, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> escreveu: > For a GPO to work, both "Authenticated Users" and "Domain Computers" must > have "Read" rights. > > On a Policy Object, go to