similar to: LDAP logins failing after installing Samba 4.4.5

Hi,   I talked to Zarafa (Kopano now) support and they acknowledge that their product in combination with Samba does not scale welland is only suitable for what they call smaller setups.     Met Vriendelijke Groet, Kind Regards, Salutations,     Bart Coninckx Bits 'n Tricks BVBA   Hoge Mierdse Heide 182 2360 Oud-Turnhout tel. +32 14 480 820 gsm +32 478 88 33 08 info at bitsandtricks.com

Hi all,   Renaming the admin account in Windows server context is a popular measure to make the network more safe.  Can we do this also in Samba 4? Are there any negative consequences?   Met Vriendelijke Groet, Kind Regards, Salutations,     Bart Coninckx Bits 'n Tricks BVBA   Hoge Mierdse Heide 182 2360 Oud-Turnhout tel. +32 14 480 820 gsm +32 478 88 33 08 info at bitsandtricks.com

>> Hi all, >> >>   >> I had an LDAP application (mailserver) running on Samba 4.1.3 which >> wrked flawlessly. Also using an LDAP browser with a simple bind >> worked OK. >> >> I than replaced the Samba installation with version 4.5 and the LDAP >> functionality broke. I first thought it had to do with a non-SSL or >> non -TLS and

Hi all,   can I freely create an account for the Wiki and do changes? Or should I notify someone (Rowland)? I found a small error in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders . The wiki mentions as rights on the share Read and Execute for Authenticated Users, but on that level I see only Full Control, Change and Read. My assumption is that it should be Change and Read for Authenticated

Hi all,   I followed the installation instructions on https://imanudin.net/2014/11/16/how-to-install-samba4-active-directory-on-centos-7-part-1/#comment-16611 to install Samba 4.1.13. One difference is that I used the Internal DNS server as opposed to the external one.    I was able to add a Windows 7 Pro workstation to the domain and I see the shares I added in smb.conf (with only the path and

Can you tell more about your setup? Is zarafa and samba on the same server for example. Which MTA are you using postfix/exim?   My top was about 150 users, and all my printers are connected also so about 200 devices do ldap searches. but my setup is split over 10+ servers ( 2 are AD DC )   So best is to tell what you can about your setup, anonimize if needed.   Greetz,   Louis  

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 09:05 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:50:31 +0100 > Bart Coninckx via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >   > > I had an LDAP application (mailserver) running on Samba 4.1.3 which > > wrked flawlessly. Also using an LDAP browser with a simple bind > > worked OK. >

Hi all, We've run into a curious issue. We run CentOS 6.5 with openssh installed (OpenSSH_5.3p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 by default). We connect to this server through sftp (Subsystem sftp internal-sftp) using the java JSch library. When opening many sftp channels on a single ssh session OpenSsh does not seem to release the sftp channels closed from the client side when there are

Are use using zarafaAccount=1 withing the search filters? I use this things like this : (&(objectClass=person)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) Or for groups. (&(objectclass=group)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) That helps a lot. ! If you switch to kopano beware to change the SCHEMA and filters zarafaAccount changed to kopanoAccount Greetz. Louis

Dear prof. Harrell, I'm not able to use the force option with fastbw, here an example of the error I've got (dataset stagec rpart package): > fitstc <- cph(Surv(stagec$pgtime,stagec$pgstat) ~ age + eet + g2 + grade + gleason + ploidy, data=stagec) > fbwstc <- fastbw(fitstc,rule="aic",type="individual") > fbwstc Deleted Chi-Sq d.f. P Residual d.f.

On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:43 +0200, Gaetan SLONGO via samba wrote: > Zarafa is not on the same server as Samba  > > We only have 2 AD/DC Samba 4.5 (CentOS 7) and we put required indexes > on LDAP .  > > Arround 1000 mailboxes but not all are simultaneously in use (approx > 1/3 in use).  > MTA is postfix (and is still connected to Samba AD, this one is not > causing the

Hai, I need to add some extra indexing on my AD DB, and im not sure if what the correct/best methode is. And is there any reason i should not do this, i did search on the wiki, but could not find the info i searched for. I know the following. Checked the current index. ( source info : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB ) ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST

On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:10:11 +0100 Bart Coninckx <info at bitsandtricks.com> wrote: >   > Adding a pointer record for the server didn't help either. I am going > to test another Windows PC now to see if the problem exists there as > well. This is strange, don't think I have ever had this problem. Can you post the following files from the Samba AD DC: /etc/hosts

I dont agree, its not always the application. Unstable powersupply can make applications crash or unstable graphics card or fault ram or unstable motherboard, bad hdd. .. And 1 google to provide proof for above statement, Google "Windows has blocked access to the graphics cards" that one applies for all the above options,, so it's not always the application. I've been

Hai, ? I was wondering, has anybody tried the sernet samba 4 applicance of installed the deb files of the appliance?on a debian (squeeze) server, in combination with zarafa and if so, whats the experiance. ? I want to move my samba 3 pdc to samba 4 AD ( on new server ) and i want to move my current zarafa server to samba4 integrated setup. which is in the applicance, as i saw here :

>Did you miss: >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs   No, this part of the wiki made me realize I have a problem. It talks about changes via the security tab. I don't have that tab. That is the whole problem. I gather from your previous answer setfacl needs to be used to sort that out. But I miss that part in the

im currently on Version 4.3.6 when i tried to upgrade to 4.4.0 i did the usual upgrade procedure but when it came to samba-tool dbcheck it said it needed to fix some of my ZARAFA extended schema attributes. Can I skip this step since it broke my install and i had to restore the backup ? Also if i want to bring my install current can i got to from 4.3.6 to 4.4.5 and then to 4.5.x or can i got

hi im still running zarafa Product version: 7,2,1,51838 and when i ran the dbcheck i couldn't authenticate against ldap from zarafa webapp i'll try to upgrade to the latest samba and rerun again and see if it breaks it. Thanks for sharing your experience. Samba - General mailing list wrote > Hai, > > You can fix it, i did it here for my zarafa 7.2.3. after

>I think your problem is being caused by the OS not knowing your users >and groups, have a look here: >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configuring_Winbindd_on_a_Samba_AD_DC   I will look into that, cheers! >But before you do that, UPGRADE your Samba version. I said that there >have been a lot of improvements, one of them is the 'winbind' built >into the

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 23:52:54 +0100 Bart Coninckx <info at bitsandtricks.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > >Why follow that particular howto ? > >   > Well, I googled for a fair amount of them and this one had a fair > amount of comments to it, which proved useful as I encountered some > of the errors and was able to learn from them. Also, I was able to > add my