similar to: Deletion of folder from windows with smb2 failed samba-4.1, samba-4.4

Hi, I am using samba 4.5.4 in my fedora machine. when I execute "smbtree" command it shows nothing with SMB2 protocol. If I change my client max protocol=NT1 in smb.conf, I can see all server present in my Network. looks like below bug. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12431 Can it be fixed or someother options can be used for the same to work with protocol greater than NT1

Hello Ralph, many thanks for your fast reply and help with this issue! :-) Am 31.08.2017 um 15:43 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: >> Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the >> samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the >> scenario and the findings, I have two

Hi Samba-Team, This issue can be reproducible in samba-4.2.5 also. Please find the attached log file for the same. Hope I may get some help to resolve it. Thanks and Regards, Shivappa On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:24 PM, shivappa sangapur <ssangapur3 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Samba-Team, > > I'm using Fedora Linux and running samba 4.1.9. > > When I submit 2 print jobs

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hello, I use libsmbclient from Python, using pysmbc: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pysmbc (its a very thin wrapper around libsmbclient). When setting "client max protocol" in smb.conf to SMB2 (or higher), libsmbclient then switches to SMB2 if the server supports it. Performance of opendir() remains much the same, but calling stat() is about 40 times slower when using SMB2. Time taken

Hello Jeremy, Andrew, All, I can now indeed confirm that my test scenario runs MUCH faster when executed against a Windows 10 SMB2 server than against Samba (test scenario takes ~ 18 seconds using a Windows SMB2 server as opposed to ~ 300 seconds when the server is Samba 4.6.5). But, most interestingly, the reason for these performance gains is NOT - as assumed by Jeremy - that the number of

Hi Rowland, Sorry, I shall post such questions to mailing list in future. Here is my smb.conf #############My smb.conf########## [global] workgroup=SAMBADFS server string=SMB Server netbios name=Shivatest realm=SAMBADFS.LOCAL log level=1 log file= max log size=2000 max smbd processes=100 security=ADS password server=10.10.1.1 wins support=no client NTLMv2 auth=Yes wins proxy=no server

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and a CentOS 7 machine. Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. - Copying to a smb share on a Mac seems to work, but is also much slower. - Using a normal Gigabit network

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 09:53:59AM +0200, MI via samba wrote: > We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and > a CentOS 7 machine. > > Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or > SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. > - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. > - Copying to

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535]

Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:36:21 -0500 (CDT) From: shivappa Sangapur via samba-technical <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> To: samba-technical at lists.samba.org Subject: Share cannot be accessed when samba is in Domain with security enabled Hi, I'm using samba-4.7.4. I have put my samba server in Domain. (Not using winbind) using NT domain with user test.

>> - smbclient [no -m option] is OK and slow (uses default SMB1/NT1?) >> - mount.cifs -o vers=1.0 is OK and slow >> - smbclient -m SMB2 (or -m SMB3) fails > The above is the interesting case, as this is much > easier to debug (in user space) than the kernel > client. > > Can you give more details on *exactly* HOW smbclient -mSMB3 > fails ? This is really

Ronnie Sahlberg, Samba Team member - has written a new small-footprint SMB2/3 client library. Compiled size is 120KB (yes, that is *KB*, not MB :-). It supports signing, sealing, NTLM authentication (and krb5 with external libraries). It has *no* dependencies (other than the afore-mentioned krb5 if you need it) and is available for checkout and hacking at: git clone

Ronnie Sahlberg, Samba Team member - has written a new small-footprint SMB2/3 client library. Compiled size is 120KB (yes, that is *KB*, not MB :-). It supports signing, sealing, NTLM authentication (and krb5 with external libraries). It has *no* dependencies (other than the afore-mentioned krb5 if you need it) and is available for checkout and hacking at: git clone

Hi Samba Users, I'm in the process of building a Samba4 CTDB /GPFS Cluster joined as a member server to AD that also supports ACL's . It has taken some time but almost everything is working now :) . My one outstanding issue is editing files using Excel 2007 on Windows 7 results in a 'Document not saved' error. I believe this is an issue with the SMB2 protocol as I can edit the same