Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all"
2017 Feb 18
2
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:10:36 +0000
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> idmap config *:backend = tdb
> idmap config *:range = 2000-9999
> idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid
> idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999
>
You mean TESTAD instead of SAMDOM, don't you?
--
2017 Feb 18
2
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:31:16 +0100
Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote:
> Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:03:33 +0000
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100
> > Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > OK, but getent and id return with
2017 Feb 20
2
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> id TESTAD\\testuser
> returns "no such user" and
>
> getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser
>
> returns a "2" code.
>
----
On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have
those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups).
I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:
2017 Feb 20
5
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:17:12 +0000
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> Only change I made before installing Samba, was to comment the
> '127.0.1.1' line in /etc/hosts
Tried again with your smb.conf and minimal changes, and it gets worse:
[2017/02/20 14:42:19.048133, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)
2017 Feb 19
4
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote:
> Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users"
> Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users"
> Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups"
> Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups"
It may be irrelevant, but I have:
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind enum users
2017 Feb 18
0
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:20:52 +0100
Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> I've got a Debian/Jessie Samba 4.2.14 running as an AD member. ADC is
> a Windows2008R2 server. Join worked without problem.
>
> # net ads testjoin
> Join is OK
>
> wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work perfectly and provides a list of users
> and groups from the AD as
2017 Feb 18
1
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:13:39 +0100
Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote:
>
> Both, alas. I'll retry by entering everything as you proposed instead
> of editing the existing file.
Please do, it should work
> Here:
>
2017 Feb 18
4
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100
Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote:
>
> OK, but getent and id return with error (id: no such user, getent:
> return code 2). On the systems I've previously set up similarly
> (Wheezy/Samba 3.6), id and getent work.
>
Is this before or after you tried my proposed smb.conf ?
> > >
> > > I've found
2017 Feb 18
3
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:52:35 +0100
Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote:
> Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:37:25 +0000
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
>
> > Is 'winbind' installed and running ?
> >
>
> Yes it is. Isn't "wbinfo" supposed to go through winbind anyway?
> 'wbinfo -i
2017 Feb 18
3
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:50:52 +0100
Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:20:52 +0100
> Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
>
>
> I've added
>
> idmap config * : backend = tdb
> idmap config * : range = 10000-30000
>
> to smb.conf, and now 'wbinfo -i
2017 Aug 16
6
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest
> version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages.
>
> Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released
> every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant.
>
>
2017 Feb 20
0
wbinfo -i returns the same id for all users, authentication doesn't seem to go through winbind at all
Le Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:28:28 -0800
L A Walsh <samba at tlinx.org> écrivait:
> It may be irrelevant, but I have:
>
> winbind enum groups = Yes
> winbind enum users = Yes
>
> in mine. The manpage makes no reference to 'enumerate' as a valid
> option.
>
Indeed. I remarked that samba often alternate spellings (like writable
and writeable or readonly) for
2018 May 25
8
weird messages in logs
Hi everyone,
I have the exact same problem as this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772154
But the Samba version is different and much newer (Debian
Wheezy 2:4.1.17+dfsg-1~bpo70+1). B
asically many errors appear about non existing usershares. These fake
usershares are just the user name, but truncated of the last character.
process_usershare_file: stat of
2017 Aug 29
2
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200
Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > These are your non-default lines:
> >
> > server signing = mandatory
>
> and i bet that one has the major performance impact
> __________________________
>
> quote from microsoft:
>
2015 Oct 05
3
Old Samba 3.x server as a Samba 4 AD member.
Hi everyone,
we plan on setting up a Samba 4.x based AD. We have a couple of ancient
to old systems running samba 3.0.24 to 3.5.7 and 3.6.24. Is there any
problem to integrate those old systems as member of a Samba 4-driven AD?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
2017 Aug 28
2
Issues with mounting Samba shares after update
Actually it isn't part of AD at all. We are using FreeIPA and Samba. We
just finally figured this out with the help of some folks at Red Hat. It
turned out there was a bug in one of the libraries that came along with
sssd (sssd-libwbclient I believe). Their suggestion to use winbind and the
version of the same library that came with it seems to have solved our
problem instantly. It
2017 Aug 28
3
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:51:42 +0200
"L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hai,
>
> Thank you for reporting this back. Very welkom and good to heard you
> fixed it.
>
> > It would be interesting to know which parameters absolutely
> > kill performance this way!
>
> Yes, that would be great to know which parameters
2017 Aug 17
2
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Hai,
Ok, so you have 3 the same machines and only one is slow. Thats important info.
Did anything special happen with this server.
For example 2 servers got a new install and this one had an upgrade (or sort of upgrade) from the "old" server?
Or you configured the new server in an other (ad site) and moved it to the new location.
In tring to figure out, where what happend, so we
2017 Aug 10
6
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Le Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:46:12 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait:
> 4.2.x is EOL as far as Samba is concerned, there have been a lot of
> changes since 4.2.* came out.
>
> Can I suggest you go here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/
>
> You can get a much more recent version there, 4.6.7
OK I'll try it, but that doesn't really explain why
2017 Aug 18
3
Issues with mounting Samba shares after update
Our fileserver (running RHEL 7.4) has suddenly stopped allowing access to
network shares through Samba. It is running Samba 4.6.2. When someone
tries to mount a shared folder it prompts them for a username and password
which fails even when the password is correct, rather than using their
valid Kerberos ticket as it has in the past. Anyone here has a similar
experience or suggestions as to