similar to: After Classic Upgrade

Am Montag, den 13.02.2017, 13:09 +0000 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > You could just turn it into a Unix domain member, but you do not need > a > wins server in AD, AD uses DNS instead. In the "old" domain we had severe issues if WINS was not enabled. And as we have a "grown" environment with NT, XP, Mac, Win7 and Win2003/8 we did not risk it to switch

Hi Rowland, you added the failover to your wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 It would be a good idea to explain some things. In your script you are using the port 519 and 520 for the failover: -------------- failover peer "dhcp-failover" { primary; address dc1.samdom.example.com; port 519; peer address

If I don't use DHCP failover, can you tell me how to do to to have manually dhcp start method working... I think I could made a mistake, this is what i did : ( I using Louis script from "old set of script" directory : https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ ) - On server S4 : resolv.conf set to S4 first and S4bis in second - On server S4 : in dhcp-dyndns-debian.sh,

Anybody have any experience with setting up dhcpd in failover mode between two servers? I set this up on a couple of servers, and it seems to be working, but I don't think it is working "right". It appears both servers are replying to all requests (which for renewals works okay because they both give the same address, but new requests get two different responses). I thought that

Thanks Rowland and Louis! :) Ok I'm going to test the failover mode! ;) Do I need to set the same value for NSRVS in dhcp-dyndns.sh? ( the first AD server, "S4" for me ) Or can I keep NSRVS=S4.ariane.intra on server S4 and NSRVS=S4bis.ariane.intra on server S4bis? It seems to be more secure for me if the first server switch off... Sam Le 27/01/2016 12:16, Rowland penny a écrit :

Hello All, I have 2 samba4 AD server with dhpd and dynamic DNS. I have well understand that for now it's not possible to have 2 DHCP server running in the same time. So I would have at a time only one dhcp server running. If the first server got a problem I want to manually start the isc-dhcp service in the second to rescue the system. But It's not working as I expected... If I switch

Hello List, Hello Rowland :-) again I'm having problems with the DDNS. I did it as shown in the wiki. I took all teh scripts from the wiki the dhcp-dyndns.sh is Version: 0.8.9 I configured everything including the failover. When I start the two DHCP-Server everything is perfect. I see the right messages in the log, the two DHCP-Servers are talking to each other. When a Client ask for an

Thank you to Rowland, L.P.H. van Belle, the entire samba team, and others that help. I've been running samba in our fire department for over a year. I'm running a self compiled samba version 4.11.9, bind version 9.11.3, BIND9_DLZ, isc-dhcp-server version 4.3.5 with fail over (between the 2 DC's) on Ubuntu 18.04 on Odroid N2 aarch64. I have 2 identical DC's on the network FDDC10

On 27/01/16 11:03, Sam wrote: > If I don't use DHCP failover, can you tell me how to do to to have > manually dhcp start method working... > > I think I could made a mistake, this is what i did : ( I using Louis > script from "old set of script" directory : > https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ ) > > - On server S4 : resolv.conf set to S4 first and S4bis in

On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> If you want to compare it with >>> something that would be TCP or QUIC. The fundamental difference between >>> virtio-vsock and e.g. TCP is that TCP operates in a packet loss environment. >>> So they are using timers for reliability, and receiver is always free to >>> discard any unacked data.

On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> If you want to compare it with >>> something that would be TCP or QUIC. The fundamental difference between >>> virtio-vsock and e.g. TCP is that TCP operates in a packet loss environment. >>> So they are using timers for reliability, and receiver is always free to >>> discard any unacked data.

Am 27.02.2017 um 11:07 schrieb Stefan Kania via samba: > Hi Rowland, > > you added the failover to your wiki: I think I found a little bug in your howto. You defined the part for the failover: ## Primary ## failover peer "dhcp-failover" { primary; address dc1.samdom.example.com; peer address dc2.samdom.example.com; max-response-delay 60; max-unacked-updates 10;

It's me again :-) Now we have DDNS with DHCP running but we have a problem on one of our two DCs. Btw we used the setup and the script from wiki. Doing a "dhclient" on a host we are getting the following messages: ------------- Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.249 DHCID: 1:50:5b:5d:1c:ab:aa Name: horst Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: execute_statement

Hi, Ok it's better like this!:-) The dhcp failover mode works well and 2 windows 7 client PC are well handled. They can have an IP and addresses are created/deleted in the DNS successfully. but... I try to remove my 2 old windows 2000 AD server from the production's LAN and put my 2 new Samba4 instead. The dhcp servers works fine but not really the DDNS. We have this kind of error

The DDNS setup from the wiki uses the keytab of the seperate "Unprivileged user for TSIG-GSSAPI DNS updates via ISC DHCP server" you have to Check this one not the one which BIND uses. Regards Am 16.05.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:32:52 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> It's me

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > ?? If you want to compare it with > > > > > something that would be TCP or QUIC.? The fundamental > > > > > difference between > > > > > virtio-vsock

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > ?? If you want to compare it with > > > > > something that would be TCP or QUIC.? The fundamental > > > > > difference between > > > > > virtio-vsock

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.23 Severity: minor Hi, a couple of minor corrections to the dhcp rule sets: First of all, the hostname matching parts need to include the "._-" signs (maybe . is not needed but it might be). Then when using failover, log lines of type DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST may be entailed by the string ": load balance to peer <somestring>".

On 2018/11/29 ??10:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:24:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/11/15 ??3:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:56:03AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >>>> >>>> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over

On 2018/11/29 ??10:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:24:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/11/15 ??3:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:56:03AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >>>> >>>> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over