similar to: How to make samba 3 trusts samba 4

Sirs, I am studying about the Samba servers and I am with a doubt. I have achieved to configure the trust relationship between two servers, althought I could only log users that would exist in those two domains (trusting and thrusted). Observing the logs I have noticed that Samba could not authenticate the users that were not common, because it could not create a users locally. Using the chmod

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: > >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:

I will follow up with you offlist. -Chris > On Apr 29, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On April 29, 2017 12:46:35 PM EDT, Chris Lattner <clattner at llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 29, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > Sent:

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> >>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 12:10:08 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > > Mehdi Amini

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Carlo Kok <ck at remobjects.com> writes: > > > On 2017-02-21 20:33, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote: > >>> Input files: > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8yn3dggx05atn47/binLinux.zip?dl=0 > >> > >> If you pass --reproduce

Thanks Rafael, wondering as of what is the level of support for ARM and is it close to production quality? Thanks On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure there is an official POC, you are probably better off asking > whatever question you have directly on the list. > > Cheers, > Rafael > > Sumonto

I think ARM ELF is pretty good. I was able to link clang with it some time ago and it now has support for thunks. Cheers, Rafael Sumonto Ghosh <sumonto.ghosh at gmail.com> writes: > Thanks Rafael, wondering as of what is the level of support for ARM and is > it close to production quality? > > Thanks > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >>> This will also greatly facilitate certain measurements I'd like to do >>> w.r.t. different strategies for avoiding

> On Apr 29, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Chris Lattner <clattner at llvm.org> writes: > >> I don’t have a link off hand. Two major points: >> >> 1) CLA’s in general require an additional approval step, which reduces contributions. > > Yes, that is the cost I mention in the

On 2017-02-21 20:33, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote: >> Input files: >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8yn3dggx05atn47/binLinux.zip?dl=0 > > If you pass --reproduce foo.tar to lld it will create a foo.tar file > with all that is needed to reproduce the link. > > Can you also share how you created the various .o files? If so I might > be able to try reducing the issue.

Is there a regression bot with a list of tests or alike Thanks On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:19 PM Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > I think ARM ELF is pretty good. I was able to link clang with it some > time ago and it now has support for thunks. > > Cheers, > Rafael > > > Sumonto Ghosh <sumonto.ghosh at gmail.com> writes: >

Hello, I've just downloaded and installed the RAqua onto my Mac and I have R up and running fine. Now I'm trying to get 'ape' downloaded and installed and having quite the difficulty. I am following the directions specified under 'Installing packages' where packages can be downloaded and installed from within R. I get the following error messages: 1: argument

2008/7/23 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: > My nightly tester on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed > to bootstrap llvm-gcc today: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > Bootstrap comparison failure! > ./build/read-rtl.o differs I am having the same problem. It was "introduced" by revision 54811, so it looks like a memory corruption problem. Investigating. > The

Martin Richtarsky <s at martinien.de> writes: > Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote : >>> Maybe gdb needs to fall back to slower line number resolution because >>> e.g. >>> low and high bounds cannot be retrieved and debug_line_address is 0? >> >> It is hard to know without a reproducible. I tried gdb on clang itself >> build with both clang and

For some time now the gold linker has support for plugins and llvm has a plugin for it. Unfortunately, it was still not possible to do fully transparent LTO on linux because ar had no support for plugins and a library created with llvm files in it would have no symbol table and would be rejected by gold. Today support for plugins has been committed to BFD. That is the file format abstraction

On 3 May 2017 at 08:01, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Can you provide a .s file that shows the difference? I managed to reproduce it by compiling 'char *var = "whatever";' in debug mode (so clang -target arm-none-eabi tmp.c -g"). Direct compile leaves no assembler-local strings, but for some reason going via -S does.

Yes,it's indeedly the correct one,and new ld can also support -plugin option,I don't know the reason of the trouble, 2009/9/17 Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> > > llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin a.a b.o -o hello > > > > which is similar with the example in the document,it tells me that > > libLLVMgold.so can not be found ,but I truly put it in the

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:46:32PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Davide Italiano <davide.italiano at gmail.com> writes: > > > >>> I couldn't find any support for this on FreeBSD. > >>> > >> > >> AFAIK FreeBSD supports