similar to: Classic upgrade and member servers

You don't have to rename per se. You can rejoin to AD with "ad.corp.com" as your hostname (and entry in /etc/hosts, which you will need) but if your member servers are on the same IP and your original DNS preserves your A records you'll still be able to connect via <servername>.corp.com after a rejoin in ADS mode. We did it two months ago and didn't have to change

On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 13:39 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 16:17 -0600, Mircea Husz via samba wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I just configured a three-site DCs setup with Samba 4.6.0, and > > replication worked great. > > But then I added a custom cert to one of the DCs to authenticate > > various apps against it. I

-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 3/6/17, lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: Subject: Re: [Samba] DC site replication issue ? To: samba at lists.samba.org Date: Monday, March 6, 2017, 9:20 AM On 3/6/2017 9:56 AM, Mircea Husz via samba wrote: > All, > > I'm migrating a samba3 domain to a new samba4 AD version 4.5.5. Did a fair

All, I configured two DCs (Samba version 4.5.5) replicating ad.corp.com in two sites ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites) Following 'DNS configuration on Domain Controllers' section from this wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory If I configure nameserver DC1 to be the first resolver for DC2, samba_dnsupdate

Hello, I just configured a three-site DCs setup with Samba 4.6.0, and replication worked great. But then I added a custom cert to one of the DCs to authenticate various apps against it. I used this wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index. php/Configuring_LDAP_over_SSL_(LDAPS)_on_a_Samba_AD_DC Now I can authenticate my apps over LDAPS against my DC, but broke replication. How do I need to configure

Hi, In order to work around a known upstream bug I needed to add a udev rule to pxeboot initrd.img on CentOS 7. The process is straightforward: 1 - extract the pxeboot initrd.img to a new directory 2 - add the udev rule needed to fix the bug 3 - pack and compress it back in initrd.img format The resulting updated image works, it fixes the upstream bug and life is good. But although it works,

Hi Alex, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:28:38 +0100, Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > It appears that samba is still using local databases and not clustered > > databases. > > > > What does "ctdb getdbmap" list? Is locking.tdb a clustered database? > > Do you have "clustering = yes" in smb.conf on all the

On 21/10/16 10:52, Ralph Böhme wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:30:46AM +0100, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >> Interestingly I have a setup here for testing for rollout of S4 AD. The file >> servers are in an AD domain and are running Sernet 4.4.5, so one version >> older than production. > maybe it's related to bug 12005 that was fixed in 4.4.6? Can you test > with

Hi Roland, Thank you for the explanation. Allow me to press the point, I'd like to understand what I'm doing. Is there value in me remapping them from their 3000000 - range default as I see it on the AD server? What is the reason for specifying a lower range such as 3000-7999 ? Thank you, -Mike On Friday, January 27, 2017 3:42 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at

>> You don't have smbd/smbstatus installed from a package in /usr/ and the >> other left over in /usr/local/, or similar? In that case, they could >> be getting their configurations from different places... >> >> peace & happiness, >> martin > Hi Martin, > > No, nothing like that. Installing the Sernet packages obsoletes the > distro ones.

That makes sense. I didn't realize that IDs for BUILTIN accounts are not identical between DCs. Since they are not identical they need to be mapped to a consistent set. Thank you for the explanation. On Friday, January 27, 2017 4:57 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 22:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Mircea Husz <mirceahusz at yahoo.com> wrote:

>> Not sure what's going on with the rest of it. Doing a bit of testing... > I tested on a 3 node test cluster, with 4.4.x and master, works as > expected. > > -slow > Hi there, Can you send your smb.conf so I can compare it to mine? Cheers, Alex -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person,

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:13:53 +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:34:21PM +1100, Martin Schwenke via samba wrote: > > If you lock the file from a client attached to 1 node and > > "smbstatus -L" shows the lock from all the nodes then CTDB is doing > > what it is meant to. That is, it makes sure that Samba

I suggest have a look in : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 i think that wil help you. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Martin Schwenke > via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 11:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] CTDB and locking issues in

On 04/11/16 07:12, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:21:46PM +0000, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >> [root at zalma ~]# stat testfile >> ... >> Size: 1286700 Blocks: 2514 IO Block: 65536 regular file >> Device: 29h/41d Inode: 35820037 Links: 1 >> Access: (0774/-rwxrwxr--) Uid: ( 3535/ jh3) Gid: ( 513/Domain Users)

Hi Ralph, I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually open it on the same host without any problems: host 1: smbclient -U ajc //172.31.0.120/ifa_v ... smb: \jmi\Corporate Accounting\ISL Ltd Accounts\2016\1609\> open "201609 213_ ISL Balance sheet variance analysis.xls" open file

On 03/07/16 21:47, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:42:36PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> I've only put the "private dir" onto MooseFS, as instructed in the CTDB >> docs. > Can you quote these docs, so that we can correct them? > >> So, in that case, I'm assuming from your comments that it is no worry >> that the mmap test does not

On 03/11/16 19:37, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:11:12PM +0000, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >> >> On 03/11/16 14:28, Ralph Böhme wrote: >>>> Ah, my smb.conf is missing the "ctdb socket" parameter. According to "man >>>> smb.conf" this should be set, but I don't remember seeing it on the wiki >>>> pages.

On 03/11/16 13:12, Ralph Böhme wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> Can you send your smb.conf so I can compare it to mine? > sure. It's a virtual cluster in LXC containers with 3 nodes, > filesystem is a bind mount with ext4. > > # cat /var/lib/lxc/ctdb-node0/rootfs/opt/samba/etc/smb.conf > [global] > clustering = yes > ctdbd socket =

> I've now managed to replicate the error on my test setup. I added a > third host and all hell broke loose - no locking at all when opening > Excel files apart from same-host. It seemed fine with two. > > I then downgraded to 4.4.5 and the problem persisted. So it cannot be > a regression from that patch. > > Regards, > > Alex > Here you go: Locked files: