similar to: Problems with bind9_dlz when rndc is reloaded

Mathias, Thanks for your reply. Please, try to start your bind with some debug level and run commando "rndc reload" and see the end of the log. I saw samba source code and found the destroy dns function in dlz_bind9.c and called by turture blz_bind9.c. When dlz_bind9.c is shutting down, I get this error when I try to update dns. update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2

Using your log parameters, the shutting down message is not showed, but when I reload rndc a get the same effect. Everything is working fine until bond9_dlz needs to reload (and no restart) rndc. When this happens, I need to restart bind and everything works fine again. I'm starting named with named -d 3 -u named and using /var/log/messages. See log using your parameters: # rndc reload

Hi Roger, I'm using Samba as AD DC in version 4.5.0 on Centos 7 with Bind9_DLZ DNS backend, Bind is 9.9.4 and I don't have that issue. I tried reload my bind using systemctl at first and no issue, then I tried "rdnc reload" to be sure rndc was used, still no issue. By no issue I don't mean log are clean, I mean the DNS service is working well (tested using dig commands).

I've added logs (dirty and quickly): logging { channel "request" { file "/var/named/named.run" size 10m; print-time yes; print-category yes; severity debug; }; category default { request; }; category security { request; }; }; Reload DNS service using systemctl once, twice, then restart Bind, reload it using rndc and no complain about log file and

Hello! After updating (only one dc) for samba 4.5.3 is occurring duplicate zone errors, when I run rndc reload Samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone This replied to all my dcs ... When I run: Samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get the error Update failed: NOTAUTH .... .... Update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries Like this topic to have reference to this,

Hum... what are these logs related to GeoIP? Perhaps this answer will be a bit rough... anyway: MS AD is complex. Samba team did a great job to reproduce its behaviour but MS product are not reputed to be too stable, so a work-in-progress reproduction of such tool has few chances to be too stable. DNS is complex by itself, especially when using Bind as backend: Bind can do lot of things related

Hi guys!! I'm facing problem with Samba 4 + winbind that I spent some days to solve that without success and I'll appreciate any help. I self compile samba 4 and apparently everything is working fine. I installed samba on six distributed servers at remote branch offices and all users, groups, dns and other components are replicating with success. But last week I saw that windind

Try cleaning up your smb.conf also.   >   vfs objects = dfs_samba4, acl_xattr Bit lower. >   vfs objects = recycle full_audit Set this as : vfs objects = dfs_samba4, acl_xattr, recycle full_audit   Your using : >   winbind nss info = rfc2307 So remove these lines >   idmap config * : backend = tdb >   idmap config *:range = 70001-80000 >   idmap config

Try changing your nsswitch.conf to passwd: files winbind sss shadow: files sss group: files winbind sss now do. net cache flush restart winbind wbinfo -u wbinfo -g getent passwd username getent passwd groupname Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Roger Lovato via > samba >

Hello, running on Debian jessie 64bit samba 4.0.8 and bind 9.9 but with the description from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind I run into the following problem: # named -u bind -g 2>&1 |tee named.log 12-Sep-2013 15:43:07.287 starting BIND 9.9.3-rpz2+rl.13214.22-P2-Debian-1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4 -u bind -g 12-Sep-2013 15:43:07.287 built with '--prefix=/usr'

On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:35 +0200 Karl Heinz Wichmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hallo Marc > > I change the loglevel to 10 > > > database > "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; > > and i get following errors: > > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: > No

Hi, I migrated our DCs from 4.5/internal dns to 4.7.1/bind9_dlz. Short summary of the steps taken: - added a new temp dc, - removed the old DCs - cleaned sam database - installed new DCs, with their old dns/ip - removed the temp dc again - synced sysvol and all is looking well: no db errors, no replication issues, ldapcmp matches across DCs, etc. So, I took things to production today, and

Hello Marc I changed the rights back to 600 and root:root to sam.ldb and i think the rights of sam.ldb.d directory are correct. -rw------- 1 root root 16M Apr 2 17:29 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 10M Apr 2 17:29 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 26M Apr 2 17:28 DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb

Hai, You posted the correct things here, for a quick fix i I'm buzzy with something else atm but i saw that /dev/urandom part. Add in the bind9 (named) apparmor profile # Samba DLZ /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/bind9/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/gensec/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/ldb/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/ldb/modules/ldb/*.so rm,

Hello, I try to add a new dc to my domain, but the sysadmin installed the main dc left misconfigured dns zones that I can not remove. ¿Is it possible to provision the domain again using new samba as main dc Keeping users and passwords Of the previous dc? The current main dc runs samba 4.4. Best regards, Santiago. -- Santiago Londoño Mejía Analista de Infraestructura t. (574) 605 25

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

Hi all, I believe I've found a bug in the encoding of the movd instruction on x64. Here's some IR code to reproduce it: external global i8*, align 1 ; <i8**>:0 [#uses=1] external global i8*, align 16 ; <i8**>:1 [#uses=1] declare void @abort() define internal void @2() { %1 = load i8** @0, align 1 ; <i8*> [#uses=1] %2 =

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Nicolas Capens<nicolas at capens.net> wrote: > I believe I’ve found a bug in the encoding of the movd instruction on x64. > Here’s some IR code to reproduce it: [snip > Note the last movq. What was probably intended to be generated was “movd > ecx, mm0”. LLVM mistakenly sets the ‘wide’ bit of the REX prefix to 1, > turning movd into movq. Also,

Hello, a short history, I am using samba 4 with Debian 9 from the repository, 2 days ago the server was broken, but I was copy all the /var/lib/samba directory to a safe place, then I was installed a new server with the same Debian and samba from repository, and stopped smbd, nmbd and winbind, unmask samba-ad-dc and finally copied all the directory from the old server to the new server and started

I have tried everything, This is CentOS 6.4 with SELinux DISABLED, Bind version BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17, samba 4.0.6 downloaded as a tar.gz from samba.org -- I have read EVERY maillinglist, IRC Log, how-to on google, tutorial on samba.org, and many many people have had this problem and not once have any of the posters resolved it, so I am now a desperate man reaching out to you with as