similar to: Small file performance

Hi Volker, Thanks for the response. The clients are Win 7, Win 10 and various flavours of Linux, with Samba client versions ranging from 3.6 to 4.5.3. There is no perceptible difference between any of them. Network latency is never above 0.2s and mostly sits at around 0.1s. If that's a problem it is so only for Samba. I did as you suggested with the smb options but that just made it

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:29:25AM +1100, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Volker, > > On 10/01/17 16:41, Volker Lendecke via samba wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:24:35AM +1100, John Gardeniers via samba wrote: > >>Hi Volker, > >> > >>Thanks for the response. The clients are Win 7, Win 10 and various flavours > >>of Linux, with Samba client

Hi All, We are experiencing painfully slow performance when transferring many small files via Samba. We are currently running Samba 4.5.1, although based on my searches the version doesn't seem to make any difference and this is a long standing problem. The servers, both the primary file server and the testbed, have dual bonded 10Gb NICs and the client network is 1Gb. Using a test

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:39:31AM +1100, John Gardeniers via samba wrote: > We are experiencing painfully slow performance when transferring many small > files via Samba. We are currently running Samba 4.5.1, although based on my > searches the version doesn't seem to make any difference and this is a long > standing problem. SMB performance critically depends on the client. What

RDP is the protocol used by Terminal Server, at least that's how I understand it. You had to enable NTLM auth, without NTLM you have only Kerberos and Kerberos relies on SPN. I still can be wrong (easily) but it seems to me not a huge work to verify if you have these SPN on your Windows acting as RDP server. 2016-11-21 1:21 GMT+01:00 John Gardeniers via samba <samba at

On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or > was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged > at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such > logs. > > On 28/10/15 14:28, John Gardeniers wrote: >> We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with

no DNS server on that planet logs normal queries just because there si not enough disk space in most setups, there is not benefit log anything except erros and warnings for normal operations what is the problem you like to solve and if there is no problem why do you want logging normal operations? in other words: what do you try to solve except https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS Am

On 11/5/2015 10:30 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 05/11/15 15:18, James wrote: >> On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: >>> Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or >>> was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get >>> logged at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to >>> locate

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the suggestion. So far, since adding 'ntlm auth' to smb.conf on the DCs we are no longer having this problem. Only time will tell if it stays working but at least I'm no longer getting complaints from the users. regards, John On 21/11/16 10:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:28 +1100 > John Gardeniers via samba <samba

Probably a ld issue. It might have not run in the rpm's post script. Do a ldd /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbregistry-samba4.so /usr/lib64/samba/vfs/acl_xattr.so and check if either are reporting missing dependencies. Em 07/02/2017 21:25, John Gardeniers via samba escreveu: > This is really weird. The error below occurred for about 10 minutes after the > post-update reboot and then went

The hard disk in my server/gateway started developing bad sectors and making very strange noises the other day.. anyway i got a new drive and copied over the partiton containing linux (ext3) onto the new drive using norton ghost which resized it from 500 odd Megabytes in size to 20 Gigabytes, the new drive works great but i have a few concerns since ghost knows nothing of ext3.. since the

HI, My setup Two node Cluster[only to create shared gfs file system] with manual fencing running on centos 4 update 5 for oracle apps. Shared gfs partiton are mounted on both the node[active-active] Whenever i type df -h command it will take some delay to print my shared gfs partiton,it is happening even if i continiosly typing df -h command. Shared GFS file system storage is from IBM

> -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of David Firth > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:12 PM > To: Paul Johnson > Cc: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] glm questions > > > Dear Paul > > Here are some attempts at your questions. I hope it's of some help.

As I said ogg is not an option here, what I am trying to find out is whether this is an icecast problem which it certainly seems to be, or what else might be going on. I know Windows is not too great, but that is what they have and they don't have the bandwidth to be the server themselves -- that is where I thought icecast could do the streaming. on 08/14/2003 Lee

On 2015-08-21 16:30, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I wonder if I'm missing the file because I only did a classicupgrade, > rather than a provision and perhaps then the file(s) is/are not > created. > > regards, > John > > > On 21/08/15 13:45, Brady, Mike wrote: >> On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> On 2015-08-21 12:52, John

On 08/31/2015 02:18 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Perhaps I misled you with my wording. Each user has just one email > address, which was not migrated across. From where I'm sitting that > looks like a very serious bug. > > regards, > John > > > On 31/08/15 19:07, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 31/08/15 07:27, John Gardeniers wrote:

Well that is not just an useless and unhelpful answer, it's also completely wrong and demonstrates a lack of knowledge and experience with DNS servers. On 05/11/15 08:21, Reindl Harald wrote: > no DNS server on that planet logs normal queries just because there si > not enough disk space in most setups, there is not benefit log > anything except erros and warnings for normal

The log file should not be in a different file? Like, smb-dns.log. This avoid increase of the log level and a lot of info not necessary to that analysis. Em 05/11/2015 14:42, James escreveu: > On 11/5/2015 10:30 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 05/11/15 15:18, James wrote: >>> On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: >>>> Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba

Hi, testparm -v | grep 'ldap serve' Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions ldap server require

What about creating a secondary samba domain that trusts the first? Can samba trust another samba? On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, John Gardeniers via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > I haven't used that tool for at least 13 years but I do recall that, among > other things, it read from the registry. Coupled with the fact that Samba 4 > AD is not